Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Most Security Pros Wouldn't Bet On The Security Of Their Networks

Majority of security pros say they wouldn't bet any amount of money that they could prevent compromises in the next year

Most security professionals would be unwilling to bet any of their own money that their networks will not be breached in the next 12 months.

According to a survey of 300 IT professionals conducted by authentication tool vendor PhoneFactor, a leading global provider of multifactor authentication, more than two-thirds (70.3 percent) of respondents are only somewhat confident or not at all confident that an unauthorized person could not gain access to their networks.

Only one-quarter (25.7 percent) of respondents are very confident that they would know their networks had been infiltrated, the study says.

When asked whether an expert hacker would be capable of infiltrating their networks, 84.4 percent of respondents thought it was at least possible, with 23.1 percent answering that an expert hacker could definitely gain access to their corporate networks.

Some of the top reasons respondents said they believe their networks may be vulnerable are malware (55.4 percent), use of personal devices to access company resources (45 percent), sheer volume of attacks (35.2 percent), and widespread use of remote network access (32.6 percent).

When asked to wager one of five amounts -- $0, $1,000, $5,000, $50,000, or $1,000,000 -- that their networks will not be compromised in the next 12 months, 57.7 percent refused to take the bet, opting for $0, the study says.

PhoneFactor, which offers a second factor of authentication through an out-of-band phone call, conducted the study to see whether security professionals would have more confidence in their networks if they had implemented such a form of authentication in their networks. The vast majority said it would, according to the study.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
FluBot Malware's Rapid Spread May Soon Hit US Phones
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/28/2021
7 Modern-Day Cybersecurity Realities
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  4/30/2021
How to Secure Employees' Home Wi-Fi Networks
Bert Kashyap, CEO and Co-Founder at SecureW2,  4/28/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-06
Primary Source Verification in VerityStream MSOW Solutions before 3.1.1 allows an anonymous internet user to discover Social Security Number (SSN) values via a brute-force attack on a (sometimes hidden) search field, because the last four SSN digits are part of the supported combination of search se...
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-06
Persistent Cross-site scripting vulnerability on Fork CMS version 5.8.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary Javascript code via the "navigation_title" parameter and the "title" parameter in /private/en/pages/add.
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-06
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Fork-CMS before 5.8.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of logged administrators.
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-06
Unconstrained Web access to the device's private encryption key in the QR code pairing mode in the eWeLink mobile application (through 4.9.2 on Android and through 4.9.1 on iOS) allows a physically proximate attacker to eavesdrop on Wi-Fi credentials and other sensitive information by monitoring the...
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-06
A security vulnerability has been identified in the HPE Edgeline Infrastructure Manager, also known as HPE Edgeline Infrastructure Management Software, prior to version 1.22. The vulnerability could be remotely exploited to bypass remote authentication leading to execution of arbitrary commands, gai...