Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

10/19/2020
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Microsoft Tops Q3 List of Most-Impersonated Brands

The technology sector was also the most likely targeted industry for brand phishing attacks, according to Check Point's latest report on brand phishing.

Microsoft bumped Amazon and Google to place first for the brand most imitated by cybercriminals in phishing attacks that go after individuals' account credentials and payment information, according to Check Point's "Q3 Brand Phishing Report."

According to Omer Dembinsky, team leader on Check Point's data research team, 19% of all brand phishing attempts studied by the company last quarter related to Microsoft. Overall, 44% of phishing attacks were via email, 43% were via the Web, and another 12% were mobile.

Related Content:

Phishing Attack Targets Microsoft 365 Users With Netflix & Amazon Lures

2020 State of Cybersecurity Operations and Incident Response

New on The Edge: Expert Tips to Keep WordPress Safe

"We don't know for sure what the reasons are, but it's clear that many organizations have their people working remotely using Office 365 and Teams, and those Microsoft applications are vulnerable," Dembinsky says. "We don't always tell people whythe trends exist – our goal is to tell security teams whatthe risks are so they can respond."

Stu Sjouwerman, CEO of KnowBe4, which provides security awareness training, says Microsoft is typically among brands most impersonated.

"Microsoft's size and broad range of products and services means that many different types of phishing campaigns can be created to push all sorts of luring messages to fool victims," Sjouwerman says. "Phishers are also likely seizing on the popularity of Office 365 users who already use and trust Microsoft email as a daily part of their lives so that when a message is sent by someone pretending to be from Microsoft, some percentage of potential victims are more inclined to trust a message or suggested action than if it came from a brand that wasn't already part of their daily use."

The technology sector was the most likely targeted industry for brand phishing attacks, followed by banking and social networking sites, according to the Check Point report.

In a brand phishing attack, cybercriminals imitate the official website of a brand by using a similar domain name, or URL, and website design. They send the link to the fake website to targeted individuals via email or text message. The attackers can also redirect users during web browsing, or the brand phishing can get triggered from a fraudulent mobile application. On the mobile front specifically, the top brands imitated in Q3 were WhatsApp, PayPal, and Facebook.

"The top three mobile impersonated brands have a significantly higher proportion of end users who conduct the majority of their business with that brand over their mobile phones," Sjouwerman says. "For example, nearly all Instagram activity occurs over cell phones and very little via larger form-factor devices. So it intuitively makes sense that phishers would borrow the brands that are more closely tied to mobile devices to send mobile-based phishing."

6 Tips
As part of its Q3 report, Check Point offers the following six tips to security teams looking to educate their companies and employees about brand phishing attacks:

Learn the red flags: Certain characteristics can give away an attack via email. They include poor formatting, spelling and grammar mistakes, and generic greetings, such as "Dear user" or "Dear customer." Links should start with https:// (not http://), and  any email that conveys a sense of urgency or wants the user to respond quickly should be regarded with suspicion.

Avoid oversharing information: As a general rule, share the bare minimum, no matter what site is requesting information. Users never need to provide their Social Security numbers to conduct a transaction, and they never need to provide credentials to third parties. 

Delete suspicious emails: If something doesn't seem right, it probably isn't. Suspicious emails should be deleted without opening or clicking on any links, or forwarded them to the IT department for investigation.  

Don't click on attachments: Do not open attachments – especially Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or PDFs – in suspicious or strange emails.

Verify the sender: With every email received, take a good look at who sent it. Who or what is the source? Watch for misspellings or alterations in the email addresses of the email sender. Do not hesitate to block suspicious email senders via the email client. 

Keep all applications up-to-date: Make sure all apps on mobile phones and desktop and laptop computers have the latest software versions, which contain the latest vulnerability patches and defenses.

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience and has covered networking, security, and IT as a writer and editor since 1992. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Cloud Security Startup Lightspin Emerges From Stealth
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/24/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29367
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
blosc2.c in Blosc C-Blosc2 through 2.0.0.beta.5 has a heap-based buffer overflow when there is a lack of space to write compressed data.
CVE-2020-26245
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
npm package systeminformation before version 4.30.5 is vulnerable to Prototype Pollution leading to Command Injection. The issue was fixed with a rewrite of shell sanitations to avoid prototyper pollution problems. The issue is fixed in version 4.30.5. If you cannot upgrade, be sure to check or sani...
CVE-2017-15682
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
In Crafter CMS Crafter Studio 3.0.1 an unauthenticated attacker is able to inject malicious JavaScript code resulting in a stored/blind XSS in the admin panel.
CVE-2017-15683
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
In Crafter CMS Crafter Studio 3.0.1 an unauthenticated attacker is able to create a site with specially crafted XML that allows the retrieval of OS files out-of-band.
CVE-2017-15684
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-27
Crafter CMS Crafter Studio 3.0.1 has a directory traversal vulnerability which allows unauthenticated attackers to view files from the operating system.