Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

3/26/2012
03:06 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft, Financial Partners Seize Servers Used In Zeus Botnets

Most Zeus operations still untouched, but a noticeable dip in Zeus botnet activity spotted by one botnet-monitoring organization

Microsoft continued its aggressive legal tear against botnets with a new operation for which the software giant successfully seized some command-and-control (C&C) servers run by cybercriminals using Zeus and its related crimeware.

So far it's unclear just how the raid and removal of an undisclosed number of Zeus C&C servers at two U.S. hosting centers -- engineered by Microsoft with the help of the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center (FS-ISAC) and electronic payments association NACHA, Kyrus Tech, and F-Secure -- has affected Zeus and Zeus-variant online crime worldwide. But according to new data from Unveillance, which tracks botnets and botnet activity, Zeus activity overall has dipped during the past seven days.

chart: Trojan Win32/Zeus, global host counts

"In the graph, we have to infer that dip is a result of some of that effort" by Microsoft, says Karim Hijazi, CEO at Unveillance. The buzz surrounding the Microsoft operation may also have helped, he says. "I honestly think that the media blitz and buzz around this may have caused security admins to recheck their AV updates and IDS/IPS egress rules, which may have caused the downturn we are seeing ... Either way, good job, Microsoft."

Zeus is unique in that it's a leased botnet used by multiple parties using the same binary, he says. "So it's hard to gauge what [Microsoft has] hit," Hijazi says. Unveillance's data shows the hourly count of infected Zeus machines worldwide dropping from more than 750 earlier in the week, to 250 in the past two days, and close to 400 as of today.

Meanwhile, SophosLabs as of this morning had not seen any "significant disruption" to Zeus operations in the wake of the C&C takedown: "Because Zeus and SpyEye are sold as kits, any takedown against specific botnets will not affect all the other botnets which are still out there. Since the kits are still available (freely in source form in the case of Zeus), it is highly likely that we will continue to see botnets created using them," blogged Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos.

Unlike previous botnet takedowns led by Microsoft, the goal of this one was not to permanently kill all of the Zeus botnets targeted in the operation, but instead to disrupt this segment of the operation, according to the company. Nor does Microsoft expect the so-called Operation b71 case -- which focused on botnets using Zeus, SpyEye and Ice-IX variants of the crimeware -- to result in the death of all Zeus botnets.

"We don’t expect this action to have wiped out every Zeus botnet operating in the world. However, together, we have proactively disrupted some of the most harmful botnets, and we expect this effort will significantly impact the cybercriminal underground for quite some time," said Richard Domingues Boscovic, senior attorney for Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit. "Cybercriminals are in this for the money, and this action was an unprecedented strike against the illicit infrastructure on which they rely. The operation will help further investigations against those responsible for the threat and help us better protect victims."

With U.S. marshals escorting them, a team from Microsoft, FS-ISAC, which represents 4,400 financial institutions, and NACHA on March 23 physically removed C&C servers used in the operation that were running out of two hosting services centers -- one in Scranton, Pa., and the other in Lombard, Ill. The result was the takedown of two IP addresses of the C&C infrastructure. Microsoft says it is monitoring some 800 domains that were taken down in order to help identify what it says are thousands of victim machines.

The action was in response to legal action taken by Microsoft and a subsequent federal court ruling that authorized the seizure. Microsoft says the move disrupted the operations of what experts say were responsible for nearly half a billion dollars in financial damages to victims.

Microsoft did not reveal the actual number of physical servers it removed from the hosting sites: "The number of command and control servers we seized as part of Friday’s operation changes constantly, underscoring the complexity of the Zeus malware and the variants we disrupted," a Microsoft spokesperson said in response to an inquiry on the count.

There are a total of 3,357 Zeus botnet domain names spanning 35 registrars, so this appears to be a small portion of the Zeus crimeware problem, notes Rik Ferguson, director of security research and communication for Trend Micro in a blog post today.

Security experts as well as Microsoft concur that this and other legal actions against botnets doesn't stop the problem. It's a win, but the war isn't over by any means, they say. "We will probably see an influx in growth again of Zeus. They will simply retool the binary ever so slightly, get some fresh domains, and here we go again," Hijazi says.

Zeus is unlike other botnet operations, he says. "The thing I admire about Zeus as an adversary is that it socially engineers its way into places. It's never going to go away," Hijazi says. That social engineering strategy is the most powerful aspect of the attacks, he says, because users are the weakest link.

Next Page: RICCO and 39 'John Does' Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5216
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.9.0, 5.2.0, and 6.3.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a newline could be injected leading to limited header injection. Upon seei...
CVE-2020-5217
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In Secure Headers (RubyGem secure_headers), a directive injection vulnerability is present in versions before 3.8.0, 5.1.0, and 6.2.0. If user-supplied input was passed into append/override_content_security_policy_directives, a semicolon could be injected leading to directive injection. This could b...
CVE-2020-5223
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
In PrivateBin versions 1.2.0 before 1.2.2, and 1.3.0 before 1.3.2, a persistent XSS attack is possible. Under certain conditions, a user provided attachment file name can inject HTML leading to a persistent Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The vulnerability has been fixed in PrivateBin v1.3...
CVE-2019-20399
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A timing vulnerability in the Scalar::check_overflow function in Parity libsecp256k1-rs before 0.3.1 potentially allows an attacker to leak information via a side-channel attack.
CVE-2020-7915
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue was discovered on Eaton 5P 850 devices. The Ubicacion SAI field allows XSS attacks by an administrator.