Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

9/9/2009
04:06 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft, Cisco Issue Defenses For TCP Denial-Of-Service Attack

Long-awaited security updates finally arrive for attacks targeting TCP, but still more to come

A denial-of-service (DoS) attack threat to Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) implementations reported more than a year ago re-emerged yesterday in the form of security updates from Microsoft and Cisco, with the two vendors each issuing protections against the potentially deadly attacks.

Microsoft and Cisco were the first vendors to address the still mostly mysterious flaws in implementations of TCP that were first revealed last fall by researchers from Outpost24. Details of the attack have been kept under wraps for security reasons, but it basically lets an attacker DoS a PC or router using just a few malicious packets, in some cases permanently damaging victim machines.

Microsoft's MS09-048 update -- labeled as "critical" -- also covers two related TCP threat: another DoS attack on TCP discovered by Recruity Labs, and a flaw in Vista and Windows Server 2008 that allows remote code execution.

Cisco's security update includes both Outpost24's TCP finds, as well as another TCP DoS in one of Cisco's Nexus 5000 products.

The good news is the two biggest potential targets for TCP DoS attacks have patched them. "I think this is a great start. I'd be surprised if other vendors didn't follow suit," says Robert E. Lee, chief security officer of Outpost24, who worked with the late Jack Louis on the TCP DoS research.

Louis, who passed away earlier this year, created the so-called Sockstress tool, which included several attack payloads to simulate the TCP DoS attacks. "Sockstress was a generic socket-stressing framework that Jack Louis wrote. In that framework, Jack included a few specific payloads that targeted different sets of resources post-handshake," Lee says. "[And] different TCP stack implementations react differently depending on which resources you deplete."

Adds Lee: "I think Jack's main message with Sockstress was not to focus on any one specific problem, but to demonstrate that we have the wrong trust model for a hostile environment. The way we expose critical resources to unauthenticated endpoints is open to exploitation."

At least 60 other vendors have been contacted by the Finnish CERT about the TCP DoS issue; to date, CERT-FI has worked with more than 35 vendors to patch it. "Some vendors have successfully prepared patches, while others are still working towards reliably working mitigation," according to a CERT-FI post on the issue. "As we are aiming to disclose the issues in a coordinated fashion, there is no certainty of a final disclosure date at this stage."

"It's tricky when a bunch of vendors are affected by the same vulnerabilities. It could open a can of worms," says Ryan Smith, principal research scientist for Accuvant Labs. "Microsoft and Cisco patching it definitely helps protect the most vulnerable targets."

Even so, it's unlikely many network administrators will bother updating their Cisco routers, says Felix "FX" Lindner, a researcher with Recruity Labs. "They will not update the router images," he says, because it requires replacing, not patching, the entire IOS. "You replace the entire operating system, which impacts the functionality of the device quite dramatically. Therefore, nobody is going to do it."

Lindner says routers are at risk, however, of a DoS attack on their TCP implementations because they allow for SSH and telnet sessions for remote management. But they aren't likely to be an attacker's first choice of a target: "How many people will use that DoS against routers is another question, since it will not really affect the router's ability to forward traffic, only lock out the network operation staff, and that has no immediate benefit for most people [attackers]," he says.

Meanwhile, Microsoft says it won't patch Windows 2000 systems affected by the TCP DoS flaws. "The architecture to properly support TCP/IP protection does not exist on Microsoft Windows 2000 systems, making it infeasible to build the fix. To do so would require rearchitecting a very significant amount of the Windows 2000 SP4 operating system, not just the affected component. The product of such a rearchitecture effort would be sufficiently incompatible...that there would be no assurance that applications designed to run on Windows 2000 SP4 would continue to operate on the updated system," Microsoft said in its bulletin.

Windows XP SP2 and SP3 are not affected by the flaw, either, according to Microsoft, because that configuration enables the Windows firewall by default, thus protecting these systems. So Microsoft says it won't issue a patch for these systems, either. But security experts say that's a serious oversight: If you modify the default to turn off the firewall or allow an exception for iTunes, then you could be vulnerable to these attacks.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/15/2019
US Mayors Commit to Just Saying No to Ransomware
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-17210
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-20
An issue was discovered in PrinterOn Central Print Services (CPS) through 4.1.4. The core components that create and launch a print job do not perform complete verification of the session cookie that is supplied to them. As a result, an attacker with guest/pseudo-guest level permissions can bypass t...
CVE-2019-12934
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-20
An issue was discovered in the wp-code-highlightjs plugin through 0.6.2 for WordPress. wp-admin/options-general.php?page=wp-code-highlight-js allows CSRF, as demonstrated by an XSS payload in the hljs_additional_css parameter.
CVE-2019-9229
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-20
An issue was discovered on AudioCodes Mediant 500L-MSBR, 500-MBSR, M800B-MSBR and 800C-MSBR devices with firmware versions F7.20A to F7.20A.251. An internal interface exposed to the link-local address 169.254.254.253 allows attackers in the local network to access multiple quagga VTYs. Attackers can...
CVE-2019-12815
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-19
An arbitrary file copy vulnerability in mod_copy in ProFTPD up to 1.3.5b allows for remote code execution and information disclosure without authentication, a related issue to CVE-2015-3306.
CVE-2019-13569
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-19
A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Icegram Email Subscribers & Newsletters plugin through 4.1.7 for WordPress. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability would allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the affected system.