Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

10/3/2017
11:28 AM
50%
50%

Less Than Half of Consumers Take Protective Steps Post-Breach

New data on consumer behavior and identity theft shows most don't protect themselves after their personal data is compromised.

Fewer than 50% of consumers take basic protective steps after their personal information is stolen, according to a report from CyberScout and the Identity Resource Center (ITRC). Most people don't know how to resolve the problem of identity theft and are left vulnerable, the report found.

The study polled consumers who had experienced a data breach that exposed their personal data, and explored the different ways consumers reacted to the incident. Eighty percent of the 317 respondents understood a data breach heightened their risk for identity theft and financial harm, but 49.3% were confused about the right steps to take following a breach notification.

More than one-third (38%) say they would contact their bank for support. However, experts note, banks are only obligated to help with bank account or credit card fraud, and not fraud related to Social Security Numbers or other sensitive data. Only 3.8% would turn to their insurance company for help, despite policies covering identity theft and monitoring, and 31.5% would not know where to turn.

The lack of direction is primarily driving feelings of frustration, anger, and anxiety, report 77% of consumers.

Forty-one percent say they would never again do business with a breached company - a problem for organizations with a history of breaches. If customers exposed by the Equifax breach share the same feelings of anxiety and frustration as those in the survey, researchers explain, millions will be vulnerable to identity theft and financial damage.

Read details about the findings here.

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/3/2017 | 5:34:55 PM
A form of security by obscurity?
I suppose part of the attitude is that "there's safety in numbers."

Out of 143 million compromised in the Equifax breach, what are the chances that ID theft gets committed against YOU?

One way of looking at it, I suppose. Not the safest, but I can't say that it doesn't have a certain statistical logic.
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-36197
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-13
An improper access control vulnerability has been reported to affect earlier versions of Music Station. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to compromise the security of the software by gaining privileges, reading sensitive information, executing commands, evading detection, etc. This ...
CVE-2020-36198
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-13
A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect certain versions of Malware Remover. If exploited, this vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands. This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. Malware Remover versions prior to 4.6.1.0. This issue does not affect: QNAP...
CVE-2021-28799
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-13
An improper authorization vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running HBS 3 (Hybrid Backup Sync. ) If exploited, the vulnerability allows remote attackers to log in to a device. This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. HBS 3 versions prior to v16.0.0415 on QTS 4.5.2; versions prior to v3...
CVE-2021-22155
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-13
An Authentication Bypass vulnerability in the SAML Authentication component of BlackBerry Workspaces Server (deployed with Appliance-X) version(s) 10.1, 9.1 and earlier could allow an attacker to potentially gain access to the application in the context of the targeted user’s acco...
CVE-2021-23134
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-12
Use After Free vulnerability in nfc sockets in the Linux Kernel before 5.12.2 allows local attackers to elevate their privileges. In typical configurations, the issue can only be triggered by a privileged local user with the CAP_NET_RAW capability.