Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

10/3/2017
11:28 AM
50%
50%

Less Than Half of Consumers Take Protective Steps Post-Breach

New data on consumer behavior and identity theft shows most don't protect themselves after their personal data is compromised.

Fewer than 50% of consumers take basic protective steps after their personal information is stolen, according to a report from CyberScout and the Identity Resource Center (ITRC). Most people don't know how to resolve the problem of identity theft and are left vulnerable, the report found.

The study polled consumers who had experienced a data breach that exposed their personal data, and explored the different ways consumers reacted to the incident. Eighty percent of the 317 respondents understood a data breach heightened their risk for identity theft and financial harm, but 49.3% were confused about the right steps to take following a breach notification.

More than one-third (38%) say they would contact their bank for support. However, experts note, banks are only obligated to help with bank account or credit card fraud, and not fraud related to Social Security Numbers or other sensitive data. Only 3.8% would turn to their insurance company for help, despite policies covering identity theft and monitoring, and 31.5% would not know where to turn.

The lack of direction is primarily driving feelings of frustration, anger, and anxiety, report 77% of consumers.

Forty-one percent say they would never again do business with a breached company - a problem for organizations with a history of breaches. If customers exposed by the Equifax breach share the same feelings of anxiety and frustration as those in the survey, researchers explain, millions will be vulnerable to identity theft and financial damage.

Read details about the findings here.

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
10/3/2017 | 5:34:55 PM
A form of security by obscurity?
I suppose part of the attitude is that "there's safety in numbers."

Out of 143 million compromised in the Equifax breach, what are the chances that ID theft gets committed against YOU?

One way of looking at it, I suppose. Not the safest, but I can't say that it doesn't have a certain statistical logic.
Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Cloud Security Startup Lightspin Emerges From Stealth
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/24/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20934
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.2.6. On NUMA systems, the Linux fair scheduler has a use-after-free in show_numa_stats() because NUMA fault statistics are inappropriately freed, aka CID-16d51a590a8c.
CVE-2020-29368
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in __split_huge_pmd in mm/huge_memory.c in the Linux kernel before 5.7.5. The copy-on-write implementation can grant unintended write access because of a race condition in a THP mapcount check, aka CID-c444eb564fb1.
CVE-2020-29369
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in mm/mmap.c in the Linux kernel before 5.7.11. There is a race condition between certain expand functions (expand_downwards and expand_upwards) and page-table free operations from an munmap call, aka CID-246c320a8cfe.
CVE-2020-29370
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk in mm/slub.c in the Linux kernel before 5.5.11. The slowpath lacks the required TID increment, aka CID-fd4d9c7d0c71.
CVE-2020-29371
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in romfs_dev_read in fs/romfs/storage.c in the Linux kernel before 5.8.4. Uninitialized memory leaks to userspace, aka CID-bcf85fcedfdd.