Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

Lancope Digs Into User Behavior

New user identity tracking capabilities will open up new security troubleshooting opportunities, vendor says

With today's upgrades to its StealthWatch product line, security vendor Lancope is trying to strike a balance between security management and network monitoring.

The vendor today added three significant features in the latest release of StealthWatch, version 5.5:

  • A user identity tracking feature that allows network managers and security teams to pinpoint the source of network activities to specific users
  • A router monitoring and reporting function that provides traffic reporting and network optimization functions, so clients can now perform tasks, such as network capacity planning, traffic analysis, network monitoring, and network optimization
  • New point-of-view technology that enables IT staff to perform different functions, like pinpointing the sources of a security breach or determining whether a company needs to upgrade a network connection

"StealthWatch provides eight preconfigured views of information, and customers can customize it for other functions, if they desire," says Tim McCormick, vice president of marketing at Lancope. This flexibility is needed because the dividing lines between security and network functions are blurring in many organizations and in a growing number of products.

In addition, Lancope announced its first appliance, the StealthWatch ID 1000, which costs $19,795 for coverage of up to 200 authentication servers. The device ties network traffic and host behavior to individual users. This product was developed in conjunction with A10 Networks, whose software enabled Lancope to connect its network monitoring functions to user directory systems, such as Microsoft's Active Directory.

Lancope is one of a handful of companies that have come up with second-generation security systems. First-generation products, such as firewalls, tried to secure transactions at the network perimeter by putting up roadblocks that would prohibit unauthorized user access to corporate networks. These intrusion detection-and-prevention systems (IDS/IPS) tools can be fairly effective in warding off attacks, like Trojan horses and worms, but have some limitations. Technology tends to change so rapidly that these systems usually cannot guard against attacks in real time. And IDS/IPS tools generally do not recognize security breaches that arise from internally generated messages.

Lancope's taking a different approach, dubbed Network Behavior Analysis (NBA). Its products monitor network traffic patterns and look for anomalies that point to potential security breaches. StealthWatch provides detailed overviews of network utilization and highlights anomalies from problem transactions. These products can be easier to install and offer more up-to-date reporting functions than IDS/IPS systems do. While helpful, NBAs are often viewed as complementary rather than complete security systems.

Lancope, which claims to have more than 200 enterprise customers, has done a credible job in establishing its market position. Competitors include Arbor Networks, Cisco Systems, GraniteEdge Networks, Mazu Networks, and Q1 Labs. "While Lancope has done well, the overall market has been quite small," notes Trent Henry, an industry analyst with the market research firm, Burton Group. Enterprises have been besieged with a wide variety of security options, and in many cases they do not see the value in NBA systems.

Consequently, vendors have been under pressure to increase revenues. Compounding the problem, startups ConSentry Networks and Intrusic, as well as established vendors, such as Check Point Software Technologies, Enterasys Networks, and Internet Security Systems, have been upgrading their product lines to combine IDS/IPS and NBA system functionality. "Customers desire a consolidated view of their network and security products," says Paul Proctor, research VP with Gartner

- Paul Korzeniowski, special to Dark Reading

Companies mentioned in this article:

Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...