Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

9/12/2019
04:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Indictments Do Little to Stop Iranian Group from New Attacks on Universities

Cobalt Dickens targeted more than 60 universities in the US and elsewhere this summer, according to a new report.

Cobalt Dickens, a threat group that the US has accused of working on behalf of the Iranian government, has launched a large global phishing campaign aimed at students, faculty, and staff at dozens of universities.

The goal, as with the group's previous campaigns, appears to be to steal research data and other academic resources.

The US government indicted nine members of the group in March 2018 on charges related to the theft of some 31TB of academic data and intellectual property from universities, businesses, government, and nongovernmental organizations. There have also been multiple takedown attempts and public disclosures of the threat actor's activities.

Even so, there's no sign that Cobalt Dickens has stopped or even slowed its attacks, Secureworks said in a report this week on a new campaign the group conducted in July and August. According to the security vendor, the latest wave of phishing emails was sent to targets in over 60 universities across the United States, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and Hong Kong.

The latest operation is similar to one Cobalt Dickens conducted last August when it used previously compromised university systems to send library-themed phishing emails to targeted individuals.

The messages purport to be about some library-related matter — such as an account expiring because of inactivity — and contain links to pages that are spoofed to look exactly like the login page of that specific university. When victims enter their username and password on the login page, the credentials are stored locally on the spoofed website and the user is then redirected to the valid university website, Secureworks said in its report this week.

Cobalt Dickens is gathering university credentials in order to access library and other proprietary systems, says Allison Wikoff, senior researcher at Secureworks Counter Threat Unit (CTU)."Past reporting and the US DoJ indictment suggests the credentials are used to take the intellectual property of these institutions as well as the library resources they have access to," she says.

Wikoff says that Secureworks has not been able to determine a specific commonality among the targeted universities regarding their academic programs or areas of specialization. Cobalt Dickens also doesn't appear to be limiting its focus to students, staff, and faculty working in specific disciplines or areas of research, she says.

In its report, Secureworks described the threat actor as taking advantage of free online services and publicly available tools wherever possible in its latest campaign. For example, it registered at least 20 new domains using Freenom, a provider of free top-level domains.

Many of the domains use valid SSL certificates issued by Let's Encrypt, a nonprofit that issues free SSL certificates. Similarly, to copy the login pages of the targeted universities, Cobalt Dickens has been using SingleFile, a publicly available tool on GitHub, and HTTrack Website Copier, another free application, the security vendor said.

So far, Cobalt Dickens has targeted some 380 universities in 30 countries in its phishing campaigns. The number includes the 30 or so universities that were targeted in the latest wave in July and August.

The group's continued attacks despite the indictments and public exposure of its tactics and techniques are an indication of how difficult it can be to stop some threat groups.

"CTU researchers surmise the operations have been successful, so there's little incentive to stop," Wikoff says. "Regarding takedown activity, infrastructure is easily rebuilt. We are aware our disclosure may not impact operations in the long term but hope that it minimally tampers it for some time," she says.

 

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "Community Projects Highlight Need for Security Volunteers."

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-8003
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
A double-free vulnerability in vrend_renderer.c in virglrenderer through 0.8.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service by triggering texture allocation failure, because vrend_renderer_resource_allocated_texture is not an appropriate place for a free.
CVE-2019-20427
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the ptlrpc module has a buffer overflow and panic, and possibly remote code execution, due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client. Interaction between req_capsule_get_size and tgt_brw_write leads to a tgt_shortio2pages integ...
CVE-2019-20428
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the ptlrpc module has an out-of-bounds read and panic due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client. The ldl_request_cancel function mishandles a large lock_count parameter.
CVE-2019-20429
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the ptlrpc module has an out-of-bounds read and panic (via a modified lm_bufcount field) due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client. This is caused by interaction between sptlrpc_svc_unwrap_request and lustre_msg_hdr_size_v2...
CVE-2019-20430
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
In the Lustre file system before 2.12.3, the mdt module has an LBUG panic (via a large MDT Body eadatasize field) due to the lack of validation for specific fields of packets sent by a client.