Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/11/2016
11:50 AM
Sean Martin
Sean Martin
Slideshows
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Here's The Business Side Of Thwarting A Cyberattack

Ponemon Group study data illustrates the balancing act of running a business while trying to stay secure.
Previous
1 of 7
Next

Image Source: AdobeStock/imsmartin

Image Source: AdobeStock/imsmartin

Companies average more than one cyberattack per month, costing them some $3.5 million per year in recovery costs. That's the big takeaway from a recent Ponemon Institute report that also showed that security professionals say they need more expertise, technology, and services to address attacks and threats that skirt their perimeter security.

The study, commissioned by BrandProtect, summarized the responses of 591 security professionals representing 505 enterprises and institutions across all markets. It focuses on how businesses are responding to the complexities and risks of what it defines as "external" threats – those arising outside a company’s traditional security perimeter such as executive impersonations, social engineering exploits, branded attacks, email spoofing or forging, and copycat websites.

So what's the actual business impact of defending and suffering from these types of attacks and threats? Here's the lowdown.

 

Sean Martin is an information security veteran of nearly 25 years and a four-term CISSP with articles published globally covering security management, cloud computing, enterprise mobility, governance, risk, and compliance—with a focus on specialized industries such as ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Previous
1 of 7
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
jonemorton02
50%
50%
jonemorton02,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/15/2016 | 10:47:14 AM
A great, essential, read.
I think this article does a great job pointing out where organizations may or may not be doing what they think they are doing with security.  That being, they believe they are secure but they aren't necessarily sure how their security efforts align with what the business is trying to accomplish by its business goals.  If nothing in the basic security policy (and the other strategy, policy and plans that stem from it) align to the business processes (and the information the flow over them) needed to achieve the business objectives, there would be an increased risk of suffering an attack for which the consequences may not have even been considered.  We can't protect everything but we should at least be protecting what we know we need to be successful.  A great read in my opinion.
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27132
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
SerComm AG Combo VD625 AGSOT_2.1.0 devices allow CRLF injection (for HTTP header injection) in the download function via the Content-Disposition header.
CVE-2021-25284
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in through SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. salt.modules.cmdmod can log credentials to the info or error log level.
CVE-2021-3144
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, eauth tokens can be used once after expiration. (They might be used to run command against the salt master or minions.)
CVE-2021-3148
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. Sending crafted web requests to the Salt API can result in salt.utils.thin.gen_thin() command injection because of different handling of single versus double quotes. This is related to salt/utils/thin.py.
CVE-2021-3151
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
i-doit before 1.16.0 is affected by Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues that could allow remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, C__M...