Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

9/9/2019
09:00 AM
By Nadav Maman, Co-Founder & Chief Technical Officer at Deep Instinct
By Nadav Maman, Co-Founder & Chief Technical Officer at Deep Instinct
Sponsored Article
50%
50%

Hackers & Artificial Intelligence: A Dynamic Duo

To best defend against an AI attack, security teams will need to adopt the mindset and techniques of a malicious actor.

The amplified efficiency of artificial intelligence (AI) means that once a system is trained and deployed, malicious AI can attack a far greater number of devices and networks more quickly and cheaply than a malevolent human actor. Given sufficient computing power, an AI system could launch many attacks, be more selective in its targets and more devastating in its impact. The potential mass destruction makes a nuclear explosion sound rather limited.

Currently the use of AI for attackers is mainly pursued at an academic level and we’re yet to see AI attacks in the wild. However, there’s a lot of talk in the industry about attackers using AI in their malicious efforts, and defenders using machine learning as a defense technology.

There are three types of attacks in which an attacker can use AI:

AI-based cyberattacks: The malware operates AI algorithms as an integral part of its business logic. This is where AI algorithms are used to detect anomalies and indicate irregular user and system activity patterns. The AI algorithm is trained to identify unusual patterns indicative of malicious activity that can be used to execute malware, increase or decrease evasion and stealth configurations and communication times. An example of this is DeepLocker, demonstrated by IBM security which encrypted ransomware to autonomously decide which computer to attack based on a face recognition algorithm.

AI facilitated cyberattacks: The malicious code and malware running on the victim’s machine does not include AI algorithms, but the AI is used elsewhere in the attacker’s environment. An example of this is Info-stealer malware which uploads a lot of personal information to the C&C server, which then runs an NLP algorithm to cluster and classify sensitive information as interesting (e.g. credit card numbers). Another example of this is spear fishing where an email is sent with a façade the looks legitimate by collecting and using information specifically relevant to the target. 

Adversarial attacks: The use of malicious AI algorithms to subvert the functionality of benign AI algorithms. This is done by using the algorithms and techniques that are built into a traditional machine learning algorithm and “breaking” it by reverse engineering the algorithm. Skylight Cyber recently demonstrated an example of this when they were able to trick Cylance’s AI based antivirus product into detecting a malicious file as benign.

The constructive AI versus malicious AI trend will continue to increase and spread across the opaque border that separates academic proof of concepts from actual full-scale attacks in the wild. This will happen incrementally as computing power (GPUs) and deep learning algorithms become more and more available to the wider public.

To best defend against an AI attack, you need to adopt the mindset and techniques of a malicious actor. Machine learning and deep learning experts need to be familiar with these techniques in order to build robust systems that will defend against them. 

For more examples of how each of the AI types of attack have been discovered, click here to read the full article.

About the Author

Nadav Maman, Co-Founder & Chief Technical Officer, Deep Instinct

Nadav Maman brings 15 years of experience in customer-driven business and technical leadership to his role as co-founder and chief technical officer at Deep Instinct. He has a proven track record in managing technical complex cyber projects, including design, executions and sales. He also has vast hands-on experience with data security, network design, and implementation of complex heterogeneous environments.

 

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cloud Security Threats for 2021
Or Azarzar, CTO & Co-Founder of Lightspin,  12/3/2020
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27772
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in coders/bmp.c. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned int`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but could po...
CVE-2020-27773
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/gem-private.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned char` or division by zero. This would most likely lead to an impact to appli...
CVE-2020-28950
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
The installer of Kaspersky Anti-Ransomware Tool (KART) prior to KART 4.0 Patch C was vulnerable to a DLL hijacking attack that allowed an attacker to elevate privileges during installation process.
CVE-2020-27774
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/statistic.c. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of a too large shift for 64-bit type `ssize_t`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but co...
CVE-2020-27775
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/quantum.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type unsigned char. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but c...