Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Hacker Lays Claim To Breaches Of Two Security Vendors' Websites

SQL injection attack conceded by Kaspersky U.S.; subsequent attack on BitDefender Portugal still awaiting confirmation

A single Romanian hacker claims he has broken through the Website defenses of two prominent security vendors in an attempt to show vulnerabilities in their security.

Kaspersky, one of the industry's best-known antivirus and security software makers, today gave a press conference confirming that a Romanian hacker had launched an SQL injection attack on its newly implemented U.S. customer support site, exposing a potentially data-threatening vulnerability in its Website. The attacker did not publish any sensitive data, even though he could have gained access to it, Kaspersky said.

The hacker, known as "unu," claims to have launched a similar SQL injection attack on the Website of security vendor BitDefender in Portugal. "It seems Kaspersky aren't the only ones who need to secure their database. Bitdefender has the same problems," unu said in an online message. As of this posting, BitDefender had not confirmed whether unu's claims were accurate.

Roel Schouwenberg, senior antivirus researcher at Kaspersky Lab, confirmed that Romanian hackers had exploited a vulnerability in code on the Website of its U.S. support site, which had just launched on Jan. 29. Kaspersky's Romanian research team discovered the attack at around midnight on Feb. 8, and they immediately rolled the site back to an earlier version that did not have the flaw. No "real data" was stolen, although the names of some of the site's address tables were published.

"A more advanced hacker" could potentially have gained access to about 2,500 email addresses and some 25,000 activation codes that resided on a Kaspersky server, Schouwenberg said. Unu claimed that his intent was only to show the vulnerabilities and not to steal data -- a claim that seems supported by the fact that he blacked out some aspects of the attack when he published it, making it difficult for other hackers to replicate.

Unu claims that he warned Kaspersky several times about the vulnerability, but that his warnings were never acknowledged. Schouwenberg said that Kaspersky did find one email from the alleged attacker, but that it was posted only an hour before he went public with the details of the attack.

Asked if Kaspersky expects its reputation to be injured by the attack, Schouwenberg said, "Honestly speaking, yes. This is not good. It should not have happened." The flaw was discovered in some custom-built code that was written locally by a third party for the U.S. support site, not by the Moscow-based team that writes most of Kaspersky's software. "Still, something went wrong in our code-reviewing process, and we could have done more to prevent it from happening," Schouwenberg said.

Kaspersky's U.S. support site is still operating on the old, nonflawed version of its Website software; the company has hired renowned security expert David Litchfield to audit the company's site and software before it goes back online. Litchfield will also help Kaspersky determine where its code review processes went wrong, so that such vulnerabilities do not occur again, Schouwenberg said.

Unu claims that an attack on the BitDefender site provided him with access to the database containing administrators' usernames and passwords, the personal details of thousands of customers, and sales data. In addition, one table in the database contains a large number of email addresses belonging to people who subscribed to the company's newsletter, he says.

Unu did not say whether he plans to launch similar attacks on any other security vendors' sites in order to prove his point about the vulnerabilities.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How to Better Secure Your Microsoft 365 Environment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/25/2021
Attackers Leave Stolen Credentials Searchable on Google
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-35128. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2020-35128. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-35128 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to preve...
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the assets component of Mautic before 3.2.4 allows remote attackers to inject executable JavaScript through the Referer header of asset downloads.
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
An issue was discovered on Accfly Wireless Security IR Camera 720P System with software versions v3.10.73 through v4.15.77. There is an unauthenticated stack-based buffer overflow in the function CNetClientManage::ServerIP_Proto_Set during incoming message handling.
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
An issue was discovered on Accfly Wireless Security IR Camera System 720P with software versions v3.10.73 through v4.15.77. There is an unauthenticated heap-based buffer overflow in the function CNetClientTalk::OprMsg during incoming message handling.
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-28
An issue was discovered on Accfly Wireless Security IR Camera System 720P with software versions v3.10.73 through v4.15.77. There is an unauthenticated stack-based buffer overflow in the function CNetClientGuard::SubOprMsg during incoming message handling.