Attacks/Breaches

Gozi Trojan Using Dark Cloud Botnet in New Wave of Attacks

Gozi IFSB banking Trojan has rolled out new code, a new botnet and a high level of customization in the latest wave of attacks.

Gozi IFSB, a banking Trojan that has been making the rounds of the internet for several years, is back with new targets, new characteristics, and a new botnet for distribution. The changes, detailed by Talos Intelligence on Tuesday, serve to make the Trojan a more dangerous threat to a select group of victims.

Gozi IFSB has begun to use the Dark Cloud botnet in recent campaigns, a development that shows the attackers are moving to infrastructures that are associated with widespread criminal and malicious activity. Dark Cloud, which uses compromised personal computers as hosts for websites that change addresses every few minutes, is based primarily in Eastern Europe and Russia.

The most recent campaign uses individually targeted email messages with malicious Microsoft Word files as the delivery mechanism for the malware payload. 

"It's likely they built emails to resemble realistic email threads, appearing to reply to a victim’s previous question or request," says Talos threat researcher Holger Unterbrink, in an email interview with Dark Reading. "In other cases, they crafted email messages that are somehow related to the victims interests such as company-related information."

The level of customization indicates a high level of human involvement with the messages, rather than a mass spam email campaign. "We believe that they are using an obfuscator script/program. In many cases we looked at, they built different obfuscated docs for every single victim," says Unterbrink.

While there are a variety of different malicious payloads attached to the delivery systems, almost all are based on VBA scripts that use various methods of obfuscation and different execution patterns in attempts to evade detection in sandbox environments. Sophisticated current sandboxes and malware detection routines would almost certainly detect the activity, but simple or older technology could easily miss the operations.

Given the new payload and delivery mechanisms, what should organizations do to protect themselves from the latest wave of Gozi IFSB? "Use a multi-layer security architecture approach," says Unterbrink. "This means a mix of security protection devices/applications which are capable of communicating with each other. Companies need to realize that some attackers are using extremely sophisticated methods and/or rely on victims making mistakes (e.g. opening phishing emails). In a multi layer protected environment, even the side effects of successful attacks can be detected."

"Another important recommendation," he says, "is to focus on user education. Setup [sic] fake phishing campaigns or buy similar services to make your user aware of this threat."

Related Content:

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop ITX. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop ITX 2018 agenda here.

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Crowdsourced vs. Traditional Pen Testing
Alex Haynes, Chief Information Security Officer, CDL,  3/19/2019
BEC Scammer Pleads Guilty
Dark Reading Staff 3/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Well, at least it isn't Mobby Dick!
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
The State of Cyber Security Incident Response
Organizations are responding to new threats with new processes for detecting and mitigating them. Here's a look at how the discipline of incident response is evolving.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-9923
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
pax_decode_header in sparse.c in GNU Tar before 1.32 had a NULL pointer dereference when parsing certain archives that have malformed extended headers.
CVE-2019-9924
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
rbash in Bash before 4.4-beta2 did not prevent the shell user from modifying BASH_CMDS, thus allowing the user to execute any command with the permissions of the shell.
CVE-2019-9925
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
S-CMS PHP v1.0 has XSS in 4.edu.php via the S_id parameter.
CVE-2019-9927
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
Caret before 2019-02-22 allows Remote Code Execution.
CVE-2019-9936
PUBLISHED: 2019-03-22
In SQLite 3.27.2, running fts5 prefix queries inside a transaction could trigger a heap-based buffer over-read in fts5HashEntrySort in sqlite3.c, which may lead to an information leak. This is related to ext/fts5/fts5_hash.c.