Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

11/6/2014
06:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google: Manual Account Hijacks Much More Dangerous Than Bot Takeovers

Targeted attacks are less common but cause more problems and financial losses for victims than nontargeted mass account takeovers, a new report from Google says.

Most online account hijacking capers are carried out using automated bots, but not all. In fact, some of the most effective and damaging heists result from targeted, carefully staged, manual attacks, a new study by Google shows.

Researchers at the search company recently reviewed manual account hijacking incidents involving users of various Google services from 2011 to 2014. For the study, the researchers looked at how criminals acquired a victim's login credentials to take over an account and how they attempted to exploit and monetize that access.

For the purposes of the study, the researchers defined a manual hijack as an incident where an attacker spends considerable time exploiting a single victim's account for financial gain. They discovered that such incidents are extremely rare. In fact, over the period of the study, the researchers observed an average of just nine incidents of manual account hijackings per million Google users per day.

However, manual account takeovers were far more damaging than automated ones. Often such attacks caused more problems and financial losses for victims than nontargeted mass account takeovers.

"These needle-in-a-haystack attacks are very challenging and represent an ongoing threat to Internet users," the researchers said in a report released this week.

Most of the account hijacking cases that the Google researchers reviewed appeared to originate from one of five countries: China, Ivory Coast, Malaysia, Nigeria, and South Africa.

In a majority of the cases, attackers used phishing emails and fake websites to get victims to part with the login credentials to their Google account. About 14% of the people who were lured to such websites were fooled into submitting their login information. Even patently fake sites managed to deceive about 3% of the people who visited them, the researchers found.

Interestingly, around 20% of the hijacked accounts were accessed in less than 30 minutes after the attackers obtained the login credentials. Once inside, the attackers spent an average of about three minutes profiling the account to see if it was worthy of further compromise.

Hackers typically used search terms like "wire transfer," "bank," and "investment" to determine an account's value quickly. For accounts they wanted to exploit further, the hackers quickly changed the password to lock out the legitimate user.

In many cases, the hackers would then attempt to scam the victim's contacts using the hijacked account. The most common scam consisted of an email describing a reasonably credible story of how the account owner got into a difficult situation, followed by a plea for money to help get out of the situation, the Google report said.

The research also showed hackers spending considerable time and effort to retain control of hijacked accounts long enough to be able to profit from them. In addition to locking out the victim and delaying recovery, hackers sometimes would set up a "doppelganger" account to divert communications from the victim's contact.

The research highlights the need for users to be vigilant about protecting their account, Google anti-abuse research lead Elie Burszlein said in a blog post. For instance, associating a backup phone number or a secondary email address with an email account is a good way to ensure an email provider has a way to get in touch in the event of a primary account takeover. Similarly, enabling two-factor authentication is another relatively simple way to mitigate risk of an account takeover, Burszlein said.

Previous studies have shown how surprisingly widespread and common account hijacking can be. In a survey of 300 people by researchers at Google and Carnegie Mellon University this year, 30% said at least one of their accounts had been hijacked. The number was more or less consistent with a Pew Research survey in 2013 that showed 21% of email account owners have had at least one of their accounts compromised.

This week's report is one of the first to examine the problem of manual account takeovers.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
11/10/2014 | 6:12:23 PM
A must reading
I suggest the reading of the Google report to my readers. Manual attacks still represents the privileged choice for targeted attacks ... and they are very effective.
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Exploits Released for As-Yet Unpatched Critical Citrix Flaw
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/13/2020
Microsoft to Officially End Support for Windows 7, Server 2008
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-15625
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
A memory usage vulnerability exists in Trend Micro Password Manager 3.8 that could allow an attacker with access and permissions to the victim's memory processes to extract sensitive information.
CVE-2019-19696
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
A RootCA vulnerability found in Trend Micro Password Manager for Windows and macOS exists where the localhost.key of RootCA.crt might be improperly accessed by an unauthorized party and could be used to create malicious self-signed SSL certificates, allowing an attacker to misdirect a user to phishi...
CVE-2019-19697
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
An arbitrary code execution vulnerability exists in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products which could allow an attacker to gain elevated privileges and tamper with protected services by disabling or otherwise preventing them to start. An attacker must already have administr...
CVE-2019-20357
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
A Persistent Arbitrary Code Execution vulnerability exists in the Trend Micro Security 2020 (v160 and 2019 (v15) consumer familiy of products which could potentially allow an attacker the ability to create a malicious program to escalate privileges and attain persistence on a vulnerable system.
CVE-2020-7222
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-18
An issue was discovered in Amcrest Web Server 2.520.AC00.18.R 2017-06-29 WEB 3.2.1.453504. The login page responds with JavaScript when one tries to authenticate. An attacker who changes the result parameter (to true) in this JavaScript code can bypass authentication and achieve limited privileges (...