Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

Global Cyberattack Campaign Hit Mobile Carrier Networks

A nation-state group possibly out of China has attacked cell carrier networks in search of data on high-value individuals.

A global cyberattack campaign believed to be the work of a nation-state group has hit telcos and mobile carriers around the world in an effort to gather intelligence on specific individuals.

The attackers stole files that show the communication history and travel patterns of a targeted individual, according to a new report by Cybereason. The attack campaign has been active since at least 2017, with some evidence going back as far as 2012, and has been incredibly effective in giving the attackers control of the victim's networks.

Some hundreds of millions of telecommunications customers and thousands of the providers' employees have been affected by the attack campaign.

"They had complete control of the network and were, in effect, the shadow IT group for the [victim] company," says Amit Serper, senior director, head of security research for Cybereason Nocturnus, which today published a report on the attacks by Serper, Mor Levi, and Assaf Dahan, called "Operation Soft Cell — A Worldwide Campaign Against Telecommunications Providers."

The attack began with a malicious Web shell sitting on a Web page. When a targeted employee visited that page, reconnaissance began. "They would compromise the network, do a credential dump, scan the network, and hop from server to server," Server says of the attack. "Finally they were able to get domain admin credentials. They were then able to create their own accounts, some of which were domain admins themselves."

Once the attackers had control of the company's servers, they went after call detail records (CDRs). With data in a CDR, the attacker could get information on the source, destination, and duration of calls; device details; physical location of the caller (because of the cell tower they were communicating with); and the device vendor and version they were using.

The attackers weren't looking for the call data for everyone — just for a few, very specific individuals. "When I when I think about how espionage has been carried out in the past, it makes perfect sense that a well-funded nation state would undertake what would seem like a very extensive campaign for a relatively narrow set of targets," says Tim Erlin, vice president of product management and strategy at Tripwire.

That strategy of using the supply chain to perform espionage on companies and individuals isn't new. But it is likely to grow in importance and frequency, says, Lavi Lazarovitz, cyber research group manager at CyberArk. He says that advanced persistent threat (APT) groups, like the one presumed to be behind this attack, have the skills and patience to pursue a target indirectly rather than being forced to be direct with their efforts.

That patience came into play in this campaign when the attackers were discovered in the telco networks. They simply changed tools and techniques, and resumed their work of gaining records for targeted individuals.

Serper says that his worries go beyond the espionage aspects of the attacks. "If they have ability to do this, they have the access level to perform sabotage on the network," he says. "The cell network is critical infrastructure, so that really worries me."

As for identifying the "they" involved, the report is careful to point out that attribution can be difficult. But the researchers say the threat actor here is likely affiliated with China, and Serper says the APT10 group is the most likely actor. Even so, "The tools used were not brand new tools; they were exposed by other companies or even open source, so if another group wanted to use them and make it look like APT10 was doing something, they could."

His take: "It's either APT10 or someone trying to make it look like APT10."

There's nothing the average consumer or organization can do to defend themselves short of making drastic changes to their mobile use patterns, he says.

For the mobile providers, defense comes down to visibility into the network and greater network control and segmentation. "I was surprised at the extent and the length of the campaign as reported," says Erlin. "I mean, it's a long time for this type of activity go undiscovered or un-analyzed."

Lazarovitz points to the lateral movement that allowed the attackers to get from desktop computers to servers holding personal information. "There should be another hop here into a more sensitive and secure network," he points out.

Related Content:

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-14869
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
A flaw was found in all versions of ghostscript 9.x before 9.28, where the `.charkeys` procedure, where it did not properly secure its privileged calls, enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. An attacker could abuse this flaw by creating a specially crafted PostScript file that could esc...
CVE-2019-18987
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
An issue was discovered in the AbuseFilter extension through 1.34 for MediaWiki. Once a specific abuse filter has (accidentally or otherwise) been made public, its previous versions can be exposed, thus potentially disclosing private or sensitive information within the filter's definition.
CVE-2019-18986
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 allow attackers to brute-force (guess) valid usernames by using the 'forgot password' functionality as it returns distinct messages for invalid password and non-existing users.
CVE-2019-18981
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 lacks an Access Denied outcome for a certain scenario of an incorrect recipient ID of a notification.
CVE-2019-18982
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
bundles/AdminBundle/Controller/Admin/EmailController.php in Pimcore before 6.3.0 allows script execution in the Email Log preview window because of the lack of a Content-Security-Policy header.