Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

9/25/2019
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

GandCrab Developers Behind Destructive REvil Ransomware

Code similarities show a definite technical link between the malware strains, Secureworks says.

The decision by the developers of GandCrab ransomware to "retire" earlier this year after raking in an estimated $2 billion in less than 18 months may have more to do with a shift in focus than a desire to fade away into obscurity.

A new Secureworks analysis of recent ransomware activity has confirmed earlier suspicions that "Gold Garden," the group behind GandCrab, is actively involved in another ransomware variant named REvil that has been wreaking havoc in recent months.

REvil first emerged in mid-April, about a month before Gold Garden announced its retirement from the ransomware scene. Since then the ransomware has been linked to numerous attacks, most notably on nearly two dozen Texas municipalities and hundreds of dentist offices around the country. The malware has been especially notable for its use in so-called "compromise-once-infect-many" attacks on targets with many customers, such as managed service providers (MSPs), Secureworks said.

In the months since GandCrab disappeared, REvil has quickly established itself as one of the most dangerous and prolific ransomware threats in the wild. The group behind it — who Secureworks has dubbed "Gold Southfield" — has been employing the same ransomware-as-a service model that GandCrab employed. Threat actors have used a variety of techniques to distribute REvil, including via an Oracle WebLogic exploit, malicious spam and phishing emails, and through compromised managed service providers.

According to Secureworks, its technical analysis of some early REvil samples uncovered several similarities in code with GandCrab that cannot be explained away by happenstance.

For example, the string decoding function in REvil is nearly identical to the one used in GandCrab. It also uses nearly the same logic and functionality for building command-and-control URLs as GandCrab. There are other artifacts in REvil's code — such as certain debug paths and version numbering patterns — that suggest the first version of REvil might at least have been intended to be the next version of GandCrab, Secureworks said.

Both GandCrab and REvil also have code that prevents the malware from infecting systems based in Russia. While that by itself is not indicative of a link, it does suggest the authors behind both malware strains are from the same region, Secureworks said.

Phony Retirement
Rob Pantazopoulos, a researcher at Secureworks' Counter Threat Unit (CTU), says it's unclear why GandCrab's developers might have suddenly decided to stop further use of that malware.

One reason could be to evade law enforcement. "The threat actors realized that their boisterous nature and researcher-taunting caused some unwanted attention, so they evolved and rebranded under REvil, which, thus far, has been significantly lower key," Pantazopoulos says.

Or it is likely an internal rift occurred among Gold Garden members, resulting in the creation of Gold Southfield with many of the same members from the original group. Regardless of the reasons, since the threat group announced its retirement, GandCrab activity appears to have completely ceased.

Technically, REvil appears to be on par with GandCrab and has more or less the same capabilities. "In my opinion, the significant difference with REvil is the targeting methodologies employed by REvil partners and distributors," Pantazopoulos says.

Since REvil first surfaced, there have been numerous reports of attackers leveraging compromised managed service providers and strategic Web compromises to essentially compromise once and infect many. "For a highly skilled threat actor, this is a low-effort, high-reward scenario," he says.

In a report last month, Fidelis, which has been tracking REvil, described the malware as one of the most active strains during the second quarter of this year. The security vendor estimated REvil as accounting for 12.5% of the ransomware market share compared with about 24% for Ryuk and 17% for the Phobos ransomware strain.

"[REvil] operations have spread wide in the last few months, thanks to different methods, such as malspam, exploit kits, RDP brute-forcing, hacks of MSP, and zero-day exploits," says a spokeswoman from Malwarebytes, another security vendor that has been tracking the malware. The malware has essentially filled the hole created by GandCrab's exit.

"GandCrab was extremely successful, but perhaps its operators decided to refocus their business in ways where they can run operations by focusing on bigger targets," the spokeswoman notes.

Related Content:

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "The Beginner's Guide to Denial-of-Service Attacks: A Breakdown of Shutdowns."

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18214
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
The Video_Converter app 0.1.0 for Nextcloud allows denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via multiple concurrent conversions because many FFmpeg processes may be running at once. (The workload is not queued for serial execution.)
CVE-2019-18202
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
Information Disclosure is possible on WAGO Series PFC100 and PFC200 devices before FW12 due to improper access control. A remote attacker can check for the existence of paths and file names via crafted HTTP requests.
CVE-2019-18209
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-19
templates/pad.html in Etherpad-Lite 1.7.5 has XSS when the browser does not encode the path of the URL, as demonstrated by Internet Explorer.
CVE-2019-18198
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In the Linux kernel before 5.3.4, a reference count usage error in the fib6_rule_suppress() function in the fib6 suppression feature of net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c, when handling the FIB_LOOKUP_NOREF flag, can be exploited by a local attacker to corrupt memory, aka CID-ca7a03c41753.
CVE-2019-18197
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-18
In xsltCopyText in transform.c in libxslt 1.1.33, a pointer variable isn't reset under certain circumstances. If the relevant memory area happened to be freed and reused in a certain way, a bounds check could fail and memory outside a buffer could be written to, or uninitialized data could be disclo...