Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

FTC Comes Down Hard on Spammers

In separate cases, agency slaps complaints on defendants for identity trafficking, bogus product claims

In the past two days, the Federal Trade Commission has filed two cases that could make spammers think twice about the lists they use and the claims they make.

Earlier today, the FTC slapped a complaint against eHealthylife.com, an international group of companies and individuals that has been using email to market Hoodia as a means of weight loss and Human Growth Hormone (HGH) as a method of reversing the aging process. In both cases, the FTC said the claims are unsubstantiated and ordered the company to stop making them.

The case could be a landmark, because it attacks spammers not only on their methods of delivery -- eHealthylife is charged with violations of the CAN-SPAM Act -- but also on the validity of their claims. The case is also the FTC's first use of the U.S. SAFEWEB Act, which was passed last year to help U.S. law enforcement agencies work more closely with foreign agencies to stop international cybercrime and online fraud.

According to the FTC complaint, the defendants falsely claimed that their supposed "Hoodia" products cause weight loss as high as 25 pounds in a month. The defendants also claimed that their HGH products would reverse the aging process by reducing cellulite, improving hearing and vision, causing new hair growth, improving emotional stability, and increasing muscle mass. The FTC charges that the defendants made all of these claims without evidence to support them.

In a separate complaint filed yesterday, the FTC and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service nailed Practical Marketing Inc. for selling mailing lists containing consumers’ credit card account numbers and security codes, bank account numbers and routing codes. Practical Marketing pleaded guilty to identity theft and was ordered to pay a $10,000 criminal fine and pay $100,000 to the USPIS Fraud Fund. The FTC is pursuing a separate civil suit against the company.

The complaint was the culmination of a sting operation by the FTC and the USPIS, in which undercover agents posed as Canadian telemarketers seeking email lists for an advance-fee credit card offer. Such credit cards violate FTC rules, bringing another charge against the defendants.

The quick arrest and guilty plea could give pause to identity thieves who collect consumers' personal information and then sell it to spammers and direct marketers. The FTC's suit is unusual in that it also holds the list seller responsible for how its downstream "clients" have used its lists. It requires Practical Marketing to evaluate the products and services its clients are offering and the truthfulness of their marketing claims; investigate any complaints it receives about its clients; terminate services to clients who are breaking the law; and report any terminated clients to the FTC.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
A Startup With NSA Roots Wants Silently Disarming Cyberattacks on the Wire to Become the Norm
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/11/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Cybersecurity: What Is Truly Essential?
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  5/12/2021
Commentary
3 Cybersecurity Myths to Bust
Etay Maor, Sr. Director Security Strategy at Cato Networks,  5/11/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Google Maps is taking "interactive" to a whole new level!
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-22117
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
RabbitMQ installers on Windows prior to version 3.8.16 do not harden plugin directory permissions, potentially allowing attackers with sufficient local filesystem permissions to add arbitrary plugins.
CVE-2021-3518
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
There's a flaw in libxml2 in versions before 2.9.11. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted file to be processed by an application linked with libxml2 could trigger a use-after-free. The greatest impact from this flaw is to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
CVE-2021-3531
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
A flaw was found in the Red Hat Ceph Storage RGW in versions before 14.2.21. When processing a GET Request for a swift URL that ends with two slashes it can cause the rgw to crash, resulting in a denial of service. The greatest threat to the system is of availability.
CVE-2002-2438
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
TCP firewalls could be circumvented by sending a SYN Packets with other flags (like e.g. RST flag) set, which was not correctly discarded by the Linux TCP stack after firewalling.
CVE-2020-25709
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-18
A flaw was found in OpenLDAP. This flaw allows an attacker who can send a malicious packet to be processed by OpenLDAP’s slapd server, to trigger an assertion failure. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.