Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

5/12/2015
11:15 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

First Example Of SAP Breach Surfaces

USIS attack in 2013 stealing background check information about government personnel with classified clearance came by way of an SAP exploit.

After the better part of a decade of warnings that SAP and other enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are wide open to attack at most organizations, this week finally brought confirmation of a high-profile breach that used SAP as its initial attack vector. The attack is a good example of the high-stakes information contained in ERP systems that are ripe for the plucking—in this case the stolen goods were files used for background checks on federal employees and contractors with access to classified intelligence.

Perpetrated back in 2013, this attack against US Investigations Services, a contractor in charge of conducting federal background checks, came to public light last year, but details at that time were sparse. Investigators had mentioned during the initial breaking of the story that they suspected state-sponsored Chinese attackers. But over the weekend Nextgov.com reported that an internal investigation points to evidence that attackers broke into USIS through an exploit in an SAP system managed by a third party.

Alexander Polyakov, CTO and co-founder of ERPScan, hopes that the public attention from this example will drive home to enterprises that the types of SAP vulnerabilities his firm and others like Onapsis have been talking about for years really deserve IT's attention. Over the past several years there have been limited examples of SAP exploitation in the public domain. In 2012 Anonymous claimed to have used an SAP zero-day to attack the Greece finance ministry, but nobody acknowledged that. And an SAP Trojan was reported in the wild in 2013, but there was no confirmation of organizations successfully attacked using it.  Just last week at SAP SAPPHIRE, Onapsis released a report that detailed the most common attack patterns used in attacks against SAP, but again there were no details confirming specific victims.

"There were some investigations like this, in which we've taken part but are not at liberty disclose any details about--it was a real attack via SAP," says Polyakov. "But this one is the first publicly acknowledged attack, and what's more important is that it's on such a critical government entity." 

Polyakov says the progression of SAP attacks will be a precautionary tale for enterprises to pay better attention to researchers' warnings before real examples of attacks start to surface. The attack against USIS played at least a partial role in the company shutting its doors this year.

"As you see when some researchers start flagging security loopholes by publishing information about one or another system's security vulnerability, it's only a matter of time before cyber criminals actually exploit it," he says. "Who will fall victim is anybody's guess."

He recommends that organizations that really want to address SAP security from all angles need to think seriously not just about vulnerability assessment and management, but also custom code security (he reports that 50 percent of enterprises have custom code on top of their SAP framework) as well as separation of duties and event monitoring.

Most importantly, it is critical to understand how SAP systems interconnect with other infrastructure.

"Business applications are highly connected with each other, and as you saw in the example, it's not only the problem of your infrastructure security, it's also a problem of all your external connections and third-party security," Polyakov says. "So what it boils down to is that a system is only as secure as its weakest link."

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
kritesh
50%
50%
kritesh,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/21/2018 | 7:11:37 AM
SAP ERP Blog
Thanks a lot for sharing a blog for SAP in SAP ERP Module. One of the best blog i have read for SAP ERP. With the help of SAP ERP you can easily control hacking issue in your software. With the help of ERP Training Programs you will easily manage and control. 
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "The truth behind Stonehenge...."
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27886
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
rakibtg Docker Dashboard before 2021-02-28 allows command injection in backend/utilities/terminal.js via shell metacharacters in the command parameter of an API request. NOTE: this is NOT a Docker, Inc. product.
CVE-2016-8153
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8154
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8155
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8156
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.