Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/7/2019
03:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Enterprises Must Be Wary of Ransomware Targeting Network File Shares & Cloud Assets

New research shows that criminals are evolving ransomware attacks against servers, network hosts, and IaaS cloud assets in search of bigger payoffs from businesses.

Ransomware attacks against individual endpoints are so passé. According to reports out this week from two security research teams, financially motivated cybercriminals are updating their ransomware playbooks in search of bigger payoffs from their victims. Increasingly, they're making more money by putting bigger game in the crosshairs, namely networked business assets such as file shares, servers, network hosts, and infrastructure-as-a-service cloud infrastructure.

A new study from researchers at Vectra shows that the biggest threat to enterprises from ransomware today is malicious encryption of shared network files. Whereas ransomware attacks against isolated endpoints should be no big deal to recover from with any modicum of backup procedures, ransomware targeting of file shares is much more likely to trigger "all-hands-on-deck" emergencies. First of all, attackers are able to do a lot more damage with minimal action by taking advantage of the scale of share volume availability to numerous local systems. It takes only a single access point to lock access to documents across numerous departments or divisions at a targeted organization.

"In a volume-sharing system, a single infected host could encrypt an entire networked volume, resulting in a global impact on the target organization's business and systems," the report explains.

What's more, in many instances, these shared volumes are themselves used as a part of backup procedures for other systems so recovery can become quite tricky without offline backups.

"The files must be recovered from the most recent cold backup if the ransom is not paid," the report says. "Backup systems attached to a network are also at risk, which is why cold offline backups are critical for recovery."

The potential risk — and payout for extortionary criminals — increases tremendously when ransomware attackers can successfully target cloud provider infrastructure and storage shares. The Vectra report points to several high-profile attacks against cloud hosting firms DataResolution.net and iNSYNQ as examples of the dynamic at play.

"The fallout from ransomware attacks against cloud service providers is far more devastating when the business systems of every cloud-hosted customer are encrypted," says Chris Morales, head of security analytics at Vectra. "Today's targeted ransomware attacks are an efficient, premeditated criminal threat with a rapid close and no middleman."

According to Vectra's study, the volume of these attacks is on the decline, but that could simply be a factor of criminals getting more discriminating and more effective with ransomware targeting. There are plenty of new and effective ransomware techniques and malware families deluging enterprises with these network-centric attacks. For example, in the past month, there have been two waves of attacks specifically targeted against enterprise storage devices from QNAP Network and Iomega.

And just this Monday, the industry saw more evidence of the evolution of the ransomware strain MegaCortex, which targets important files on servers and network hosts and is tied to attacks that have asked for as much as $5.8 million from large organizations. New analysis out from researchers with Accenture iDefense shows a version 2 of MegaCortex floating around that shifts this from a very manual ransomware tool to something with automated self-execution features.

"The authors of MegaCortex v2 have redesigned the ransomware to self-execute and removed the password requirement for installation. The changes suggest that the malware authors traded some security for ease of use and automation," writes Leo Fernandes, senior manager for malware analysis and countermeasures at Accenture iDefense. "Potentially, there could be an increase in the number of MegaCortex incidents if actors decide to start delivering it through email campaigns or dropped as a secondary stage by other malware families.

Related Content:

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
8/7/2019 | 10:52:37 PM
Ways to combat the problem
There are numerous ways to address the problems with fileshares:
  • Enable LanMan Workstation parameters to 1
  • File and Print Sharing should be set to Authentication and Encryption

 

Encrypt File & Printer

When it comes to SMB/CIFS sharing. User can add this to their GPO policies to help address this file/printer sharing issue across the board.



A word to the wise, at least we hope.


Todd
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2014-5118
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
A Security Bypass Vulnerability exists in TBOOT before 1.8.2 in the boot loader module when measuring commandline parameters.
CVE-2019-12422
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
Apache Shiro before 1.4.2, when using the default "remember me" configuration, cookies could be susceptible to a padding attack.
CVE-2012-4441
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
Cross-site Scripting (XSS) in Jenkins main before 1.482 and LTS before 1.466.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML in the CI game plugin.
CVE-2019-10764
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
In elliptic-php versions priot to 1.0.6, Timing attacks might be possible which can result in practical recovery of the long-term private key generated by the library under certain conditions. Leakage of a bit-length of the scalar during scalar multiplication is possible on an elliptic curve which m...
CVE-2019-19117
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-18
/usr/lib/lua/luci/controller/admin/autoupgrade.lua on PHICOMM K2(PSG1218) V22.5.9.163 devices allows remote authenticated users to execute any command via shell metacharacters in the cgi-bin/luci autoUpTime parameter.