Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

7/31/2014
06:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Energetic' Bear Under The Microscope

Kaspersky Lab report finds more industries hit by the infamous cyber espionage campaign -- and evidence pointing to French and Swedish-speaking attackers as well as Eastern European ones.

The profilic cyberspying operation known as Energetic Bear and DragonFly has been busy the past few months and the closer researchers dig into its operations, the bigger and more expansive its reach appears.

Kaspersky Lab today published an in-depth report on the attack campaign, which the firm says has infected more than 2,800 known victims around the globe, including 101 organizations it could identify, mainly in the US, Spain, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, Turkey, Ireland, Portland, and China. The attacks have been detected hitting not only industrial/machinery and manufacturing firms, but pharmaceutical, construction, education, and IT firms as well.

Meanwhile, Kaspersky named the campaign Energetic Yeti because its researchers say they can't confirm the attackers are Russian. While researchers at F-Secure concluded the attacking group is Russian, Kaspersky researchers say it's unclear. The researchers say they found clues of French and Swedish-speaking players, for instance. "The Energetic Bear was the initial name given to this campaign by Crowd Strike according to their nomenclature. The Bear goes for attribution, and Crowd Strike believes this campaign has a Russian origin. Kaspersky Lab is still investigating all existing leads; however, at the moment there are no strong points in either direction," says Nicolas Brulez, principal security researcher at Kaspersky Lab.

F-Secure and Symantec recently had spotted the attackers targeting mainly energy and some manufacturing firms with the so-called Havex Trojan, and Symantec as far back as March saw the group shifting its focus onto energy firms, with half of the targets in energy and 30% in energy control systems.

Sean Sullivan, a security adviser at F-Secure in an interview with Dark Reading last month said the attack campaign was not pure espionage: "From what I've seen, it looks to me like they want a broad range of targets. The espionage going on here seems to be a wide net for any sort of infrastructure that might give the ability to get your way politically... That fits in with what I know of Russian [attacker] tactics."

Kaspersky's report, meanwhile, also notes that the attackers use mainly the Havex Trojan, and there are at least 27 different versions of it, including modules that target industrial control systems. Spear-phishing and waterholing attacks are the initial infection vector as well as compromised SCADA software updates, which F-Secure and Symantec reported last month.

"Thanks to the monitoring of several of the C&C domains used by the group, we were able to identify several victims. This victim list reinforces the interests shown by the Crouching Yeti actor in strategic targets, but also shows the interest of the group in many other not-so-obvious institutions. We believe they might be collateral victims, or maybe it would be fair to redefine the Crouching Yeti actor not only as a highly targeted one in a very specific area of interest, but a broad surveillance campaign with interests in different sectors," Kaspersky's report says.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
BoatnerB
50%
50%
BoatnerB,
User Rank: Author
8/1/2014 | 10:22:52 AM
Interesting piece
Interesting reading, Kelly!
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
8/1/2014 | 9:26:33 AM
Re: state-sponsored hacking
Dear Kelly,

I suspect that they have used them, but we are not able to detect any similar intrusion due to the difficulties to track high sophisticated APT (e.g. State-sponsored malware).

Anyway, as you have remarked, it is worrying that the bad actors succeeded also exploiting poorly configured servers.

Thanks
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
8/1/2014 | 9:19:50 AM
Re: state-sponsored hacking
Appparently, they really didn't need 0days, which is sad but reality.
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
8/1/2014 | 9:01:20 AM
Re: state-sponsored hacking
yes Kelly you are right ... comments in the code, as explained by other security firms, seems indicate that hackers have Russian origin. I believe it is very strange that no zero-day exploits were used in the campaign, I believe that there are a lot of details still uncovered.

 
Kelly Jackson Higgins
50%
50%
Kelly Jackson Higgins,
User Rank: Strategist
8/1/2014 | 7:54:22 AM
Re: state-sponsored hacking
State-sponsored is definitely the assumption on this campaign. It's interesting that Kaspersky Lab is saying they can't confirm it's Russian-based. CrowdStrike and F-Secure have indicated it's out of Russia. But attribution can be tricky, as we've seen.
securityaffairs
50%
50%
securityaffairs,
User Rank: Ninja
8/1/2014 | 6:25:07 AM
state-sponsored hacking
Despite the attribution is very difficult and the bad actors behind the campaign haven't used any sophisticated strain of malware, I believe that the APT has a state-sponsored origin.

Statistics on working time, dimension of the architecture and targeted industries suggest me that we are facing with a cyber espionage campaign arranged by a government ... and probably this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-29040
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-16
The JSON web services in Liferay Portal 7.3.4 and earlier, and Liferay DXP 7.0 before fix pack 97, 7.1 before fix pack 20 and 7.2 before fix pack 10 may provide overly verbose error messages, which allows remote attackers to use the contents of error messages to help launch another, more focused att...
CVE-2021-29041
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-16
Denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability in the Multi-Factor Authentication module in Liferay DXP 7.3 before fix pack 1 allows remote authenticated attackers to prevent any user from authenticating by (1) enabling Time-based One-time password (TOTP) on behalf of the other user or (2) modifying the othe...
CVE-2021-29047
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-16
The SimpleCaptcha implementation in Liferay Portal 7.3.4, 7.3.5 and Liferay DXP 7.3 before fix pack 1 does not invalidate CAPTCHA answers after it is used, which allows remote attackers to repeatedly perform actions protected by a CAPTCHA challenge by reusing the same CAPTCHA answer.
CVE-2021-22668
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-16
Delta Industrial Automation CNCSoft ScreenEditor Versions 1.01.28 (with ScreenEditor Version 1.01.2) and prior are vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read while processing project files, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2021-29039
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-16
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Asset module's categories administration page in Liferay Portal 7.3.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the site name.