Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

12/19/2017
10:30 AM
Adam Meyers
Adam Meyers
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail vvv
100%
0%

Comprehensive Endpoint Protection Requires the Right Cyber Threat Intelligence

CTI falls into three main categories -- tactical, operational, and strategic -- and answers questions related to the "who, what, and why" of a cyber attack.

A recent report from Grand View Research predicts that the cyber threat intelligence (CTI) market will reach $12.6 billion by 2025. This growth in demand isn't surprising when you consider the ongoing success of so many high-profile and extremely damaging attacks. This climate of increasingly sophisticated breaches has moved many organizations — particularly, those that handle and retain sensitive data — to upgrade their cybersecurity measures by adding CTI and incident forensics.

Different Types of CTI
Acknowledging the need to integrate CTI into your security strategy to more comprehensively protect endpoints is only the first step. Threat intelligence comes in many forms, and discerning the relative value of a CTI solution can be confusing. Granted, there are a variety of free open source intelligence feeds available, but leveraging them can put a strain on IT security resources and divert security operations center managers and threat analysts from the security planning and prevention tasks that are vital to their roles.

If you're considering adding threat intelligence to your security strategy, it's important to understand that CTI falls into three main categories — tactical, operational, and strategic — and all play a role in achieving comprehensive cybersecurity. Collectively, they answer questions related to the "who, what, and why" of a cyber incident. The following are brief descriptions of each type:

  • Tactical CTI: This form of CTI answers the "what" of a cyber incident and consists largely of bad IP addresses, URLs, file hashes, known malicious domain names, etc. Tactical CTI is the easiest to gather and is available through open source feeds. In addition, this intelligence is short-term in nature because it can be outdated almost as soon as it arrives.
  • Operational CTI: This form of intelligence analyzes and profiles threat actors and adversaries: the "who" behind the attacks. While still fairly short-term in nature, operational CTI requires human analysis because it adds context by delving into the motivations, intentions, and capabilities of attackers.
  • Strategic CTI: Strategic CTI is long-term and takes a geopolitical view that analyzes risk factors such as global events, foreign policy factors, and other local and international movements and agendas that can affect your organization's safety. It is the most difficult type of intelligence to generate because it requires data collection by human analysts with a deep understanding of cybersecurity and the nuances of geopolitical circumstances. Due to its complexity, this intelligence is delivered in detailed, in-depth reports. Strategic CTI answers questions related to the "why" of an incident.

How CTI Can Be a Powerful Addition to Your Cybersecurity
Regardless of the threat level you face, CTI provides value only when it's actionable. Simply integrating open source threat feeds with existing security products, such as an intrusion prevention system, next-generation firewall, or security information and event management (SIEM) system, can't provide the kind of intelligence needed to mitigate risk or remediate a problem. Although some companies struggle to implement this intelligence effectively, CTI can be a powerful tool when applied correctly. The following are examples of how CTI can be used to increase your organization's cybersecurity:

  • CTI can optimize prevention and strengthen defenses in anticipation of an attack: Operational CTI provides details on adversaries and helps recognize early-warning signs predicting an attack in the making, allowing security teams to mitigate risks.
  • CTI can accelerate detection time: The ingestion and application of technical indicators into a SIEM system or endpoint detection and response tools fortifies them with the latest intelligence. This allows such solutions to automatically correlate and detect incidents faster by eliminating the requirement of waiting for a product update or for the creation of new detection rules.
  • CTI can speed investigation and incident response times: By providing context and attribution, threat intelligence helps prioritize responses and accelerate investigations. With context and attribution, incident management becomes less unwieldy; security teams can start to separate the "forest from the trees" and apply correct prioritization to their workflows.
  • CTI can empower better security and executive decisions: Knowing which adversaries are likely to target your organization and why allows decision-makers to allocate the defenses and resources necessary to protect assets that are most at risk. At a higher level, executive decisions may include identifying and weighing the risk/reward equation of business outcomes, allowing stakeholders to select the option that presents the least risk for the highest reward.

Related Content:

Adam Meyers has over a decade of experience within the information security industry. He has authored numerous papers that have appeared at peer reviewed industry venues and has received awards for his dedication to the field. At CrowdStrike, Adam serves as the VP of ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DoothCom
50%
50%
DoothCom,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/19/2017 | 2:47:02 PM
Threat Intelligence
 So what would the learning curve look like for older companies adjusting to this CTI campaign? Would it be possible or is this all a young company game now? 
Commentary
Cyberattacks Are Tailored to Employees ... Why Isn't Security Training?
Tim Sadler, CEO and co-founder of Tessian,  6/17/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Powerful Cybersecurity Skills the Energy Sector Needs Most
Pam Baker, Contributing Writer,  6/22/2021
News
Microsoft Disrupts Large-Scale BEC Campaign Across Web Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-34390
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel function where a lack of checks allows the exploitation of an integer overflow on the size parameter of the tz_map_shared_mem function.
CVE-2021-34391
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel�s tz_handle_trusted_app_smc function where a lack of integer overflow checks on the req_off and param_ofs variables leads to memory corruption of critical kernel structures.
CVE-2021-34392
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel where an integer overflow in the tz_map_shared_mem function can bypass boundary checks, which might lead to denial of service.
CVE-2021-34393
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in TSEC TA which deserializes the incoming messages even though the TSEC TA does not expose any command. This vulnerability might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution, causing information disclosure.
CVE-2021-34394
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in all TAs whose deserializer does not reject messages with multiple occurrences of the same parameter. The deserialization of untrusted data might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution.