Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

12/19/2017
10:30 AM
Adam Meyers
Adam Meyers
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail vvv
100%
0%

Comprehensive Endpoint Protection Requires the Right Cyber Threat Intelligence

CTI falls into three main categories -- tactical, operational, and strategic -- and answers questions related to the "who, what, and why" of a cyber attack.

A recent report from Grand View Research predicts that the cyber threat intelligence (CTI) market will reach $12.6 billion by 2025. This growth in demand isn't surprising when you consider the ongoing success of so many high-profile and extremely damaging attacks. This climate of increasingly sophisticated breaches has moved many organizations — particularly, those that handle and retain sensitive data — to upgrade their cybersecurity measures by adding CTI and incident forensics.

Different Types of CTI
Acknowledging the need to integrate CTI into your security strategy to more comprehensively protect endpoints is only the first step. Threat intelligence comes in many forms, and discerning the relative value of a CTI solution can be confusing. Granted, there are a variety of free open source intelligence feeds available, but leveraging them can put a strain on IT security resources and divert security operations center managers and threat analysts from the security planning and prevention tasks that are vital to their roles.

If you're considering adding threat intelligence to your security strategy, it's important to understand that CTI falls into three main categories — tactical, operational, and strategic — and all play a role in achieving comprehensive cybersecurity. Collectively, they answer questions related to the "who, what, and why" of a cyber incident. The following are brief descriptions of each type:

  • Tactical CTI: This form of CTI answers the "what" of a cyber incident and consists largely of bad IP addresses, URLs, file hashes, known malicious domain names, etc. Tactical CTI is the easiest to gather and is available through open source feeds. In addition, this intelligence is short-term in nature because it can be outdated almost as soon as it arrives.
  • Operational CTI: This form of intelligence analyzes and profiles threat actors and adversaries: the "who" behind the attacks. While still fairly short-term in nature, operational CTI requires human analysis because it adds context by delving into the motivations, intentions, and capabilities of attackers.
  • Strategic CTI: Strategic CTI is long-term and takes a geopolitical view that analyzes risk factors such as global events, foreign policy factors, and other local and international movements and agendas that can affect your organization's safety. It is the most difficult type of intelligence to generate because it requires data collection by human analysts with a deep understanding of cybersecurity and the nuances of geopolitical circumstances. Due to its complexity, this intelligence is delivered in detailed, in-depth reports. Strategic CTI answers questions related to the "why" of an incident.

How CTI Can Be a Powerful Addition to Your Cybersecurity
Regardless of the threat level you face, CTI provides value only when it's actionable. Simply integrating open source threat feeds with existing security products, such as an intrusion prevention system, next-generation firewall, or security information and event management (SIEM) system, can't provide the kind of intelligence needed to mitigate risk or remediate a problem. Although some companies struggle to implement this intelligence effectively, CTI can be a powerful tool when applied correctly. The following are examples of how CTI can be used to increase your organization's cybersecurity:

  • CTI can optimize prevention and strengthen defenses in anticipation of an attack: Operational CTI provides details on adversaries and helps recognize early-warning signs predicting an attack in the making, allowing security teams to mitigate risks.
  • CTI can accelerate detection time: The ingestion and application of technical indicators into a SIEM system or endpoint detection and response tools fortifies them with the latest intelligence. This allows such solutions to automatically correlate and detect incidents faster by eliminating the requirement of waiting for a product update or for the creation of new detection rules.
  • CTI can speed investigation and incident response times: By providing context and attribution, threat intelligence helps prioritize responses and accelerate investigations. With context and attribution, incident management becomes less unwieldy; security teams can start to separate the "forest from the trees" and apply correct prioritization to their workflows.
  • CTI can empower better security and executive decisions: Knowing which adversaries are likely to target your organization and why allows decision-makers to allocate the defenses and resources necessary to protect assets that are most at risk. At a higher level, executive decisions may include identifying and weighing the risk/reward equation of business outcomes, allowing stakeholders to select the option that presents the least risk for the highest reward.

Related Content:

Adam Meyers has over a decade of experience within the information security industry. He has authored numerous papers that have appeared at peer reviewed industry venues and has received awards for his dedication to the field. At CrowdStrike, Adam serves as the VP of ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DoothCom
50%
50%
DoothCom,
User Rank: Apprentice
12/19/2017 | 2:47:02 PM
Threat Intelligence
 So what would the learning curve look like for older companies adjusting to this CTI campaign? Would it be possible or is this all a young company game now? 
Florida Town Pays $600K to Ransomware Operators
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/20/2019
Pledges to Not Pay Ransomware Hit Reality
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  6/21/2019
AWS CISO Talks Risk Reduction, Development, Recruitment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/25/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12888
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-26
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-12887. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-12887. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-12887 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to preve...
CVE-2019-12280
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
PC-Doctor Toolbox before 7.3 has an Uncontrolled Search Path Element.
CVE-2019-3961
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
Nessus versions 8.4.0 and earlier were found to contain a reflected XSS vulnerability due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability via a specially crafted request to execute arbitrary script code in a users browse...
CVE-2019-9836
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) on Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Platform Security Processor (PSP; aka AMD Secure Processor or AMD-SP) 0.17 build 11 and earlier has an insecure cryptographic implementation.
CVE-2019-6328
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-25
HP Support Assistant 8.7.50 and earlier allows a user to gain system privilege and allows unauthorized modification of directories or files. Note: A different vulnerability than CVE-2019-6329.