Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/1/2013
08:51 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Comfoo' APT Cyberespionage Campaign Exposed

Trojan used in the breach of RSA in 2010 remains active and prolific in targeted attacks

LAS VEGAS -- BLACK HAT USA -- A remote access Trojan (RAT) that was used in the big RSA data breach three years ago remains active and prolific in targeted attacks against government ministries, telecommunications providers, mineral exploration firms, technology firms, and media outlets, mainly in Asia and some in the U.S.

Click here for more of Dark Reading's Black Hat articles.

Malware experts Joe Stewart and Don Jackson of Dell Secureworks gained access to the command-and-control (C&C) infrastructure of the so-called Comfoo Trojan -- a rare feat in most advanced persistent threat (APT) attacks -- and also found proof of how widespread the lesser known malware really is: The researchers discovered 64 different targeted attack campaigns using the RAT, as well as some 200 variants of the Trojan.

Comfoo has been associated with one of China's largest cyberespionage organizations known as the Beijing Group, and the attacks discovered by Secureworks operate on the same infrastructure as the group. "But it may or may not be the same persons at the other end of the computers. They may just be sharing the same infrastructure," Stewart says.

The RAT has been in development since at least 2006, but has managed to fly mostly under the radar, according to the researchers, who published a report on Comfoo this week.

Japan and India were the main targets, as well as Taiwan and South Korea. The researchers also found infected machines in the U.S. and Europe.

Despite the Comfoo Trojan's longevity and regular revamping, it's one of the lesser-publicized RATs, according to Stewart, mainly because it has kept a relatively low profile. "It's still under the radar, it would seem. There have not been a lot of public reports" about it, he says. "But we saw all of this infrastructure, all of these tags and campaigns and all of this malware.

"There's a lot of it being used and a lot more targets than people suspect," says Stewart, who is director of malware research for Dell Secureworks' Counter Threat Unit. "The amount of work this team must be doing to maintain this Trojan and all this infrastructure" is significant, he says.

Stewart was able to access Comfoo's C&C servers because back-end servers didn't require authentication and because he was able to crack the infrastructure's encryption. He figured out the protocol and static encryption key that was hard-coded into Comfoo binary code, and got a bird's-eye view of victim machines dialing home to the Trojan's C&C relay servers. Secureworks would not reveal the names of the victim organizations, but all have been alerted about the attacks, Stewart says.

While the researchers were unable to see the actual data being lifted from the victims, they witnessed Comfoo accessing system and network information, logging keystrokes, uploading files, downloading files, taking screenshots, and opening a command shell.

One major attack campaign waged by the Comfoo gang was in 2012, hitting more than 20 Japanese government ministries, universities, municipal governments, trade organizations, media outlets, think-tanks, and industrial machinery manufacturers.

In an interesting twist, Comfoo also targeted the networks of audioconferencing and videoconferencing companies. Stewart says it's possible that they are trying to steal intellectual property here on this technology, but more likely that they are gathering intel on these companies for spying purposes on other targets via the providers' audio- and videoconferencing systems.

The full Secureworks report is available here.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
What the FedEx Logo Taught Me About Cybersecurity
Matt Shea, Head of Federal @ MixMode,  6/4/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
A View From Inside a Deception
Sara Peters, Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-23394
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-13
The package studio-42/elfinder before 2.1.58 are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via execution of PHP code in a .phar file. NOTE: This only applies if the server parses .phar files as PHP.
CVE-2021-34682
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
Receita Federal IRPF 2021 1.7 allows a man-in-the-middle attack against the update feature.
CVE-2021-31811
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an OutOfMemory-Exception while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-31812
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an infinite loop while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-32552
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
It was discovered that read_file() in apport/hookutils.py would follow symbolic links or open FIFOs. When this function is used by the openjdk-16 package apport hooks, it could expose private data to other local users.