Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


04:15 AM
Connect Directly

Color-Coding Web Searches

New ScanSafe Web filtering feature gives users the green light to visit sites in their search results, providing they are safe

Red light, green light is becoming the way to ensure users don't hit the wrong Website: ScanSafe has added a new feature to its Web filtering service that lets enterprises alert users before they visit unsafe Websites they've found in their Google, Yahoo, MSN, or other searches.

ScanSafe's new SearchAhead feature is based on its free Scandoo search utility for consumers, which displays sites in a search with a red "x" for malicious sites, a yellow question mark for suspicious ones, and a green "check" for safe ones.

SearchAhead goes a step further, letting enterprises automatically warn their users of sites that are deemed unacceptable or unauthorized based on company Web filtering policies. ScanSafe scans the sites in real-time, so the site's viability is constantly being checked.

Dan Nadir, vice president of product strategy for ScanSafe, says the SearchAhead feature -- now part of the vendor's Web filtering service at no extra charge -- differs from McAfee's SiteAdvisor search utility in that it does real-time scanning and lets enterprises actually enforce a policy that users can't visit certain sites.

"Red is 'inappropriate,' yellow is 'caution,' green is 'fine,' and a spider [icon] means there's a potential of something malicious on the site," Nadir says. ScanSafe estimates that one in five result pages contain malware or offensive content.

And unlike Scandoo, which basically warns users about dangerous sites, users can't visit the "red" sites with SearchAhead.

But Thomas Ptacek, a security researcher with Matasano Security, says it's risky to move your sensitive Web traffic to a third party for inspection. And the "yellow" or "questionable" designation doesn't add much value.

"The other question is 'What do I do with yellow?' Either it's safe or it isn't," he says. "SMB network operators don't have time to sort through thousands of yellow alerts to decide what is or what isn't okay."

Microsoft's Internet Explorer 7 does some Website-filtering for users based on certificates and focuses mostly on known phishing sites. "We're categorizing every single link," Nadir says. "We know if there's malware content within one minute of someone posting it."

ScanSafe uses a combination of third-party scanning engines, databases, and heuristics for checking Website search requests. Nadir says ScanSafe's Web Filtering and other services, which include Web malware scanning and IM control, are popular among small enterprises that don't have the IT resources or funds to handle their own Web filtering. But the product also has some large enterprise customers who have sites around the globe with different privacy laws and bandwidth speeds.

The full suite of ScanSafe services costs about $6- to $7 per user per month.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

  • ScanSafe Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Virginia a Hot Spot For Cybersecurity Jobs
    Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  10/9/2019
    How to Think Like a Hacker
    Dr. Giovanni Vigna, Chief Technology Officer at Lastline,  10/10/2019
    7 SMB Security Tips That Will Keep Your Company Safe
    Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  10/11/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Cartoon Contest
    Current Issue
    7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
    This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
    Flash Poll
    2019 Online Malware and Threats
    2019 Online Malware and Threats
    As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
    A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in admin/translate/translateheader_view.php in LimeSurvey 3.19.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the tolang parameter, as demonstrated by the index.php/admin/translate/sa/index/surveyid/336819/lang/ PATH_INFO.
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
    Pivotal RabbitMQ, versions prior to v3.7.18, and RabbitMQ for PCF, versions 1.15.x prior to 1.15.13, versions 1.16.x prior to 1.16.6, and versions 1.17.x prior to 1.17.3, contain two components, the virtual host limits page, and the federation management UI, which do not properly sanitize user input...
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
    The broken-link-checker plugin through 1.11.8 for WordPress (aka Broken Link Checker) is susceptible to Reflected XSS due to improper encoding and insertion of an HTTP GET parameter into HTML. The filter function on the page listing all detected broken links can be exploited by providing an XSS payl...
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
    The eu-cookie-law plugin through 3.0.6 for WordPress (aka EU Cookie Law (GDPR)) is susceptible to Stored XSS due to improper encoding of several configuration options in the admin area and the displayed cookie consent message. This affects Font Color, Background Color, and the Disable Cookie text. A...
    PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
    The events-manager plugin through 5.9.5 for WordPress (aka Events Manager) is susceptible to Stored XSS due to improper encoding and insertion of data provided to the attribute map_style of shortcodes (locations_map and events_map) provided by the plugin.