Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

End of Bibblio RCM includes -->
5/28/2021
05:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail

Chinese APT Groups Continue to Pound Away on Pulse Secure VPNs

Security vendor says it has observed threat groups using a set of 16 tools specifically designed to attack Pulse Secure devices since April 2020.

Multiple cyberthreat groups believed to be working in support of China's long-term economic interests are continuing to hammer away at networks belonging to organizations across the defense, high-tech, government, transportation, and financial services sectors in the US and Europe.

FireEye's Mandiant group this week reported it had responded to numerous intrusions where China-based threat actors compromised Pulse Secure VPN appliances to break into an organization's network and steal sensitive data.

Related Content:

Chinese APT Targets Telcos in 5G-Related Cyber-Espionage Campaign

Special Report: Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises

New From The Edge: A Wrench and a Screwdriver: Critical Infrastructure's Last, Best Lines of Defense?

In many instances, the attackers took advantage of an authentication bypass vulnerability in the Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) appliance (CVE-2021-22893) and a combination of previously known vulnerabilities to gain initial access on a victim network. The authentication bypass flaw was discovered and patched last month — but only after attackers had begun exploiting it in the wild. However, Mandiant researchers were often unable to determine an initial access vector because the threat actors deleted or altered forensic evidence or the Pulse Secure appliance itself had gone through software updates that destroyed evidence of initial compromise.

Mandiant's warning this week on the advanced persistent threat (APT) activity from China targeted at US and European companies is an update to a warning it had issued last month on the same issue. In that alert, Mandiant had reported on two China-based groups — UNC2630 and UNC2717 — using a battery of malware tools to target vulnerabilities in Pulse Secure VPN appliances. Mandiant said it had observed UNC2630 targeting organizations in the US defense industrial base and UNC2717 hitting an organization in the EU. The Mandiant report offered an analysis of 12 malware code families that the security vendor said it had observed the attackers using to specifically target vulnerabilities in Pulse Secure VPN appliances.

In this week's report, Mandiant said it had uncovered four additional malware families — Bloodmine, Bloodbank, CleanPulse and RapidPulse — that appear specifically designed to exploit vulnerabilities in Pulse Secure VPN devices. That brings the total number of malware families that Mandiant says it has observed Chinese APT groups using to specifically target Pulse Secure VPNs since last April to 16.

"The exploitation activity we have observed is a mix of targeting unpatched systems with CVEs from 2019 and 2020, as well as a previously unpatched 2021 CVE (CVE-2021-22893)," says Stephen Eckels, reverse engineer at Mandiant. "Since our original report, Pulse Secure and Mandiant have worked together, and the zero-day has since been patched."  

Similarly, other vulnerabilities that Pulse Secure's parent Ivanti discovered as part of a code review have also been patched, he says.

"At this time, Pulse Secure has patched all known vulnerabilities," Eckels says.

Once on a network, the attackers have employed different methods to achieve persistence and for lateral movement. In some instances, the attackers have established their own local admin accounts on strategic Windows servers and used that to operate freely within the victim network. They also have been exclusively using Pulse Secure webshells and malware to maintain presence rather than relying on backdoors on internal endpoints. With some attacks, the threat actors targeted individuals with privileged accounts by previously compromising unprivileged accounts belonging to the same individuals.

Strategic Goals
According to Mandiant, UNC2630 and UNC2717 are just two of multiple threat groups targeting Pulse Secure VPNs that appear to be working in the interests of the Chinese government. Several of the groups are using the same set of tools, but their tactics and techniques have tended to vary.

The main motivation appears to be to gather data that would help China achieve the objectives of its recent 14th Five Year Plan. Many of the victims are from industries that China considers to be of strategic importance, including high tech and defense. Mandiant says it has observed instances where the Chinese threat actors have stolen intellectual property with dual commercial and military applications.

So far, at least, there has been no evidence that the threat actors have stolen US data that would give Chinese companies an economic advantage. A 2012 agreement between President Barack Obama and Chinese counterpart Xi specifically prohibits cyber espionage involving such data. But that doesn't mean they haven't, says Ben Read, director of analysis at Mandiant threat intelligence.

"Right now we're not able to say that they haven't, just that we don't have direct evidence that they have violated [the agreement]," he says. "Some of the affected entities are private companies that would have commercial intellectual property, the theft of which would violate the agreement. We just have not seen direct evidence of that type of data being staged or exfiltrated."  

Mandiant's report on the ferocious ATP activity from China coincides with a warning from Microsoft this week about a widespread email campaign by Nobellum, the Russian threat actor behind the SolarWinds attack. In both instances, the primary motive appears to be cyber espionage in support of strategic national goals.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
//Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The 10 Most Impactful Types of Vulnerabilities for Enterprises Today
Managing system vulnerabilities is one of the old est - and most frustrating - security challenges that enterprise defenders face. Every software application and hardware device ships with intrinsic flaws - flaws that, if critical enough, attackers can exploit from anywhere in the world. It's crucial that defenders take stock of what areas of the tech stack have the most emerging, and critical, vulnerabilities they must manage. It's not just zero day vulnerabilities. Consider that CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog lists vulnerabilitlies in widely used applications that are "actively exploited," and most of them are flaws that were discovered several years ago and have been fixed. There are also emerging vulnerabilities in 5G networks, cloud infrastructure, Edge applications, and firmwares to consider.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2023-1172
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-17
The Bookly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the full name value in versions up to, and including, 21.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that w...
CVE-2023-1469
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-17
The WP Express Checkout plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘pec_coupon[code]’ parameter in versions up to, and including, 2.2.8 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenti...
CVE-2023-1466
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-17
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Student Study Center Desk Management System 1.0. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function view_student of the file admin/?page=students/view_student. The manipulation of the argument id with the input 3' AND (SELECT 2100 FROM (SELECT(...
CVE-2023-1467
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-17
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in SourceCodester Student Study Center Desk Management System 1.0. Affected is an unknown function of the file Master.php?f=delete_img of the component POST Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument path with the input C%3A%2Ffoo.txt le...
CVE-2023-1468
PUBLISHED: 2023-03-17
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in SourceCodester Student Study Center Desk Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file admin/?page=reports&date_from=2023-02-17&date_to=2023-03-17 of the component Report Handler. The manipula...