Attacks/Breaches

9/25/2017
03:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Breach at Deloitte Exposes Emails, Client Data

Intrusion may have resulted from company's failure to properly secure a key administrator account.

Big Four accounting giant and cybersecurity consultancy Deloitte has suffered a data breach that ironically enough may have resulted from the firm's failure to follow its own security advice to clients.

The Guardian on Monday reported that an intrusion at Deloitte between October and November last year exposed emails containing highly sensitive data belonging to an unknown number of large US companies and government organizations.

The intrusion, which Deloitte did not discover until March 2017, apparently stemmed from the company's failure to use two-factor authentication to protect a critical administrator account — something that it advocates as a best practice for clients. Attackers used the account to get privileged and unrestricted access to Deloitte's entire Azure-hosted email system.

During the multiple months that the threat actors managed to remain undetected on Deloitte's network, they potentially had access to some 5 million emails. The attackers also had potential access to usernames, passwords, health information, and highly sensitive data belonging to an unspecified number of Deloitte's clients, The Guardian said.

Deloitte itself has claimed that the actual number of emails and the scope of the data that was affected is only a "fraction" of the number suggested by The Guardian.

In an emailed statement to Dark Reading, Deloitte confirmed the breach and said the attackers had accessed data from the company's email platform. Deloitte's investigation of the incident has enabled it to understand precisely what data was at risk and what the attackers actually accessed.

Only a "very few" clients were affected, the company said. "No disruption has occurred to client businesses, to Deloitte's ability to continue to service clients, or to consumers," the statement noted. Deloitte immediately informed the appropriate government authorities upon breach discovery and contacted each of the clients that were affected, it added.

It's unclear how the threat actor might have obtained access to the administrator account that The Guardian reported as being used for the theft. But the company's apparent failure to properly protect it came in for some criticism Monday from security executives. 

Several feel that the company, as one of the largest cybersecurity consultancies in the industry, should have known better than to use a single password for the account, especially at a time when credential theft and misuse have become rampant.

"Clearly, they don't exactly practice what they preach," says Gaurav Banga, founder and CEO of Balbix. Based on the details available so far, the attack itself does not appear to be particularly sophisticated, he says. "If there is no two-factor authentication on administrative accounts, and unencrypted emails are floating around, then the adversary does not need to work very hard after an initial breach-head is established."

The apparent fact that Deloitte did not discover the intrusion for several months is not entirely surprising in this context, adds Rich Campagna, CEO of Bitglass.

"Breaches involving credential compromise often take months to identify and remediate," he says. "From an IT perspective, it can be difficult to notice unusual activity from hijacked accounts — it may simply appear that users are going about their jobs normally. At Deloitte's scale, manual review of each somewhat suspicious transaction isn't a feasible option."

The main takeaway from incidents like these is that organizations must mandate two-factor authentication on all external accounts and services, adds Mark Dufresne, director of threat research and adversary prevention at Endgame.

"This is another example of a case in which the actors didn't need exploits or malware to gain access," says Dufresne, "but were simply able to capitalize on employees' poor cyber hygiene."

Related content:

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industrys most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
9/26/2017 | 9:11:37 AM
Thoughts
2 Factor identification is mandatory.  Eliminate SSNumber as an authentication tool.  Do not OUTSOURCE - and the big 4 do outsource AUDIT controls that that Bastion of all things CHEAP ----- INDIA.  Be truthful and forthright about a breach situation.  Tell ALL the truth at once.  
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security 2018
This Dark Reading Tech Digest explores the biggest news stories of 2018 that shaped the cybersecurity landscape.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3906
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 contains hardcoded credentials in the WCF service on port 9003. An authenticated remote attacker can use these credentials to access the badge system database and modify its contents.
CVE-2019-3907
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores user credentials and other sensitive information with a known weak encryption method (MD5 hash of a salt and password).
CVE-2019-3908
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 stores backup files as encrypted zip files. The password to the zip is hard-coded and unchangeable. An attacker with access to these backups can decrypt them and obtain sensitive data.
CVE-2019-3909
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Premisys Identicard version 3.1.190 database uses default credentials. Users are unable to change the credentials without vendor intervention.
CVE-2019-3910
PUBLISHED: 2019-01-18
Crestron AM-100 before firmware version 1.6.0.2 contains an authentication bypass in the web interface's return.cgi script. Unauthenticated remote users can use the bypass to access some administrator functionality such as configuring update sources and rebooting the device.