Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/9/2018
02:20 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

AWS Employee Flub Exposes S3 Bucket Containing GoDaddy Server Configuration and Pricing Models

Publicly accessible S3 bucket included configuration data for tens of thousands of systems, as well as sensitive pricing information.

Editors' note: This article and its headline was updated to correct details about ownership of the S3 bucket and contents therein. 

Another week, another publicly accessible AWS storage cloud found to be leaking enterprise secrets. This time around, the company exposed was GoDaddy – but in a twist on the normal storyline, it was an AWS employee responsible for the misconfiguration. Researchers with the UpGuard Cyber Risk Team today disclosed that they found a publicly accessible Amazon S3 bucket wide open for public consumption.  

Included within that data store were documents that detailed configurations for tens of thousands of systems in the AWS cloud. Additionally, documents with pricing information about these systems were similarly accessible. 

"Essentially, this data mapped a very large scale AWS cloud infrastructure deployment, with 41 different columns on individual systems, as well as summarized and modeled data on totals, averages, and other calculated fields," UpGuard's researchers reported. "Also included were what appear to be GoDaddy's discounts from Amazon AWS, usually restricted information for both parties, who must negotiate for rates."

Exposures such as these have become extremely prevalent. In this year alone, organizations including Accenture, FedEx, and Walmart have all been similarly exposed. Even though Amazon S3 buckets are securely configured by default, many AWS customers tend to turn off security settings for expedience. In an unusual turn of events, this particular exposure was caused not by GoDaddy but by an AWS employee.  

"The bucket in question was created by an AWS salesperson to store prospective AWS pricing scenarios while working with a customer," an Amazon spokesperson said. "No GoDaddy customer information was in the bucket that was exposed. While Amazon S3 is secure by default, and bucket access is locked down to just the account owner and root administrator under default configurations, the salesperson did not follow AWS best practices with this particular bucket.”

According to one study earlier this year by Digital Shadows, researchers estimated that 1.5 billion sensitive files were visible on the internet from misconfigured S3 buckets, NAS devices, FTP servers, and other cloud storage systems.

Configuration information such as that detailed in the exposed documents could potentially provide attackers with a wealth of information, including data about hostname, operating system, memory, CPU, AWS region, and what the specific workloads were being used for. This would be extremely valuable for attackers seeking to map out GoDaddy infrastructure to help direct future malicious activity and find particularly juicy targets. 

However, a spokesperson with GoDaddy explained that the documents exposed were "speculative models from an AWS employee and do not reflect work currently underway with Amazon."

Nevertheless, the pricing data exposed by this incident could have been used for competitive advantage by GoDaddy rivals, technology service vendors, and cloud providers.

"Knowing the details of GoDaddy’s AWS discounts could give others a negotiation advantage and price point that would otherwise be unknown," the report explains. "Furthermore, the way in which GoDaddy allocates their cloud spend is also strategic – this is a blueprint for running cloud infrastructure at the largest scales."

Related Content:

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Small Business Security: 5 Tips on How and Where to Start
Mike Puglia, Chief Strategy Officer at Kaseya,  2/13/2020
Architectural Analysis IDs 78 Specific Risks in Machine-Learning Systems
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  2/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9308
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
archive_read_support_format_rar5.c in libarchive before 3.4.2 attempts to unpack a RAR5 file with an invalid or corrupted header (such as a header size of zero), leading to a SIGSEGV or possibly unspecified other impact.
CVE-2019-20479
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
A flaw was found in mod_auth_openidc before version 2.4.1. An open redirect issue exists in URLs with a slash and backslash at the beginning.
CVE-2011-2498
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
The Linux kernel from v2.3.36 before v2.6.39 allows local unprivileged users to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering creation of PTE pages.
CVE-2012-2629
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) and cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Axous 1.1.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add an administrator account via an addnew action to admin/administrators_add.php; or (2) c...
CVE-2014-3484
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the __dn_expand function in network/dn_expand.c in musl libc 1.1x before 1.1.2 and 0.9.13 through 1.0.3 allow remote attackers to (1) have unspecified impact via an invalid name length in a DNS response or (2) cause a denial of service (crash) via an invalid ...