Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/9/2018
02:20 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

AWS Employee Flub Exposes S3 Bucket Containing GoDaddy Server Configuration and Pricing Models

Publicly accessible S3 bucket included configuration data for tens of thousands of systems, as well as sensitive pricing information.

Editors' note: This article and its headline was updated to correct details about ownership of the S3 bucket and contents therein. 

Another week, another publicly accessible AWS storage cloud found to be leaking enterprise secrets. This time around, the company exposed was GoDaddy – but in a twist on the normal storyline, it was an AWS employee responsible for the misconfiguration. Researchers with the UpGuard Cyber Risk Team today disclosed that they found a publicly accessible Amazon S3 bucket wide open for public consumption.  

Included within that data store were documents that detailed configurations for tens of thousands of systems in the AWS cloud. Additionally, documents with pricing information about these systems were similarly accessible. 

"Essentially, this data mapped a very large scale AWS cloud infrastructure deployment, with 41 different columns on individual systems, as well as summarized and modeled data on totals, averages, and other calculated fields," UpGuard's researchers reported. "Also included were what appear to be GoDaddy's discounts from Amazon AWS, usually restricted information for both parties, who must negotiate for rates."

Exposures such as these have become extremely prevalent. In this year alone, organizations including Accenture, FedEx, and Walmart have all been similarly exposed. Even though Amazon S3 buckets are securely configured by default, many AWS customers tend to turn off security settings for expedience. In an unusual turn of events, this particular exposure was caused not by GoDaddy but by an AWS employee.  

"The bucket in question was created by an AWS salesperson to store prospective AWS pricing scenarios while working with a customer," an Amazon spokesperson said. "No GoDaddy customer information was in the bucket that was exposed. While Amazon S3 is secure by default, and bucket access is locked down to just the account owner and root administrator under default configurations, the salesperson did not follow AWS best practices with this particular bucket.”

According to one study earlier this year by Digital Shadows, researchers estimated that 1.5 billion sensitive files were visible on the internet from misconfigured S3 buckets, NAS devices, FTP servers, and other cloud storage systems.

Configuration information such as that detailed in the exposed documents could potentially provide attackers with a wealth of information, including data about hostname, operating system, memory, CPU, AWS region, and what the specific workloads were being used for. This would be extremely valuable for attackers seeking to map out GoDaddy infrastructure to help direct future malicious activity and find particularly juicy targets. 

However, a spokesperson with GoDaddy explained that the documents exposed were "speculative models from an AWS employee and do not reflect work currently underway with Amazon."

Nevertheless, the pricing data exposed by this incident could have been used for competitive advantage by GoDaddy rivals, technology service vendors, and cloud providers.

"Knowing the details of GoDaddy’s AWS discounts could give others a negotiation advantage and price point that would otherwise be unknown," the report explains. "Furthermore, the way in which GoDaddy allocates their cloud spend is also strategic – this is a blueprint for running cloud infrastructure at the largest scales."

Related Content:

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
10 Ways to Keep a Rogue RasPi From Wrecking Your Network
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  7/10/2019
The Security of Cloud Applications
Hillel Solow, CTO and Co-founder, Protego,  7/11/2019
Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10100
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
NASA CFITSIO prior to 3.43 is affected by: Buffer Overflow. The impact is: arbitrary code execution. The component is: over 40 source code files were changed. The attack vector is: remote unauthenticated attacker. The fixed version is: 3.43.
CVE-2019-10100
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
BigTree-CMS commit b2eff67e45b90ca26a62e971e8f0d5d0d70f23e6 and earlier is affected by: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page. The impact is: Any Javascript code can be executed. The component is: users management page. The attack vector is: Insert payload into users' pro...
CVE-2019-10100
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
PluckCMS 4.7.4 and earlier is affected by: CWE-434 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type. The impact is: get webshell. The component is: data/inc/images.php line36. The attack vector is: modify the MIME TYPE on HTTP request to upload a php file. The fixed version is: after commit 09f0ab871...
CVE-2019-13612
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
MDaemon Email Server 19 skips SpamAssassin checks by default for e-mail messages larger than 2 MB (and limits checks to 10 MB even with special configuration), which is arguably inconsistent with currently popular message sizes. This might interfere with risk management for malicious e-mail, if a cu...
CVE-2019-10100
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-16
Zammad GmbH Zammad 2.3.0 and earlier is affected by: Cross Site Scripting (XSS) - CWE-80. The impact is: Execute java script code on users browser. The component is: web app. The attack vector is: the victim must open a ticket. The fixed version is: 2.3.1, 2.2.2 and 2.1.3.