Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/9/2018
02:20 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

AWS Employee Flub Exposes S3 Bucket Containing GoDaddy Server Configuration and Pricing Models

Publicly accessible S3 bucket included configuration data for tens of thousands of systems, as well as sensitive pricing information.

Editors' note: This article and its headline was updated to correct details about ownership of the S3 bucket and contents therein. 

Another week, another publicly accessible AWS storage cloud found to be leaking enterprise secrets. This time around, the company exposed was GoDaddy – but in a twist on the normal storyline, it was an AWS employee responsible for the misconfiguration. Researchers with the UpGuard Cyber Risk Team today disclosed that they found a publicly accessible Amazon S3 bucket wide open for public consumption.  

Included within that data store were documents that detailed configurations for tens of thousands of systems in the AWS cloud. Additionally, documents with pricing information about these systems were similarly accessible. 

"Essentially, this data mapped a very large scale AWS cloud infrastructure deployment, with 41 different columns on individual systems, as well as summarized and modeled data on totals, averages, and other calculated fields," UpGuard's researchers reported. "Also included were what appear to be GoDaddy's discounts from Amazon AWS, usually restricted information for both parties, who must negotiate for rates."

Exposures such as these have become extremely prevalent. In this year alone, organizations including Accenture, FedEx, and Walmart have all been similarly exposed. Even though Amazon S3 buckets are securely configured by default, many AWS customers tend to turn off security settings for expedience. In an unusual turn of events, this particular exposure was caused not by GoDaddy but by an AWS employee.  

"The bucket in question was created by an AWS salesperson to store prospective AWS pricing scenarios while working with a customer," an Amazon spokesperson said. "No GoDaddy customer information was in the bucket that was exposed. While Amazon S3 is secure by default, and bucket access is locked down to just the account owner and root administrator under default configurations, the salesperson did not follow AWS best practices with this particular bucket.”

According to one study earlier this year by Digital Shadows, researchers estimated that 1.5 billion sensitive files were visible on the internet from misconfigured S3 buckets, NAS devices, FTP servers, and other cloud storage systems.

Configuration information such as that detailed in the exposed documents could potentially provide attackers with a wealth of information, including data about hostname, operating system, memory, CPU, AWS region, and what the specific workloads were being used for. This would be extremely valuable for attackers seeking to map out GoDaddy infrastructure to help direct future malicious activity and find particularly juicy targets. 

However, a spokesperson with GoDaddy explained that the documents exposed were "speculative models from an AWS employee and do not reflect work currently underway with Amazon."

Nevertheless, the pricing data exposed by this incident could have been used for competitive advantage by GoDaddy rivals, technology service vendors, and cloud providers.

"Knowing the details of GoDaddy’s AWS discounts could give others a negotiation advantage and price point that would otherwise be unknown," the report explains. "Furthermore, the way in which GoDaddy allocates their cloud spend is also strategic – this is a blueprint for running cloud infrastructure at the largest scales."

Related Content:

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Cloud Security Startup Lightspin Emerges From Stealth
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/24/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29378
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600D4L V1.01.49, V1600D-MINI V1.01.48, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. It is possible to elevate the privilege of a CLI user (to full administrative access) by using the password [email protected]#y$z%x6x7q8c9z) for the e...
CVE-2020-29379
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D4L V1.01.49 and V1600D-MINI V1.01.48 OLT devices. During the process of updating the firmware, the update script starts a telnetd -l /bin/sh process that does not require authentication for TELNET access.
CVE-2020-29380
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600D4L V1.01.49, V1600D-MINI V1.01.48, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. TELNET is offered by default but SSH is not always available. An attacker can intercept passwords sent in cleartext and conduct a man-in-...
CVE-2020-29381
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600D4L V1.01.49, V1600D-MINI V1.01.48, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. Command injection can occur in "upload tftp syslog" and "upload tftp configuration" in the CLI via a crafted filename...
CVE-2020-29382
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-29
An issue was discovered on V-SOL V1600D V2.03.69 and V2.03.57, V1600G1 V2.0.7 and V1.9.7, and V1600G2 V1.1.4 OLT devices. A hardcoded RSA private key (specific to V1600D, V1600G1, and V1600G2) is contained in the firmware images.