Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

2/21/2019
05:50 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Attack Campaign Experiments with Rapid Changes in Email Lure Content

It's like polymorphic behavior - only the changes are in the email lures themselves, with randomized changes to headers, subject lines, and body content.

A new email Trojan campaign spotted by security researchers has added another twist in evasive attacker behavior: Researchers with GreatHorn report that the waves of attacks they've observed since yesterday afternoon are rapidly randomizing the email content characteristics of their lures.

"Masquerading as a confirmation on a paid invoice, the attack is sophisticated in that it lacks the consistency of a typical volumetric attack, making it more challenging for email security tools to identify and block," says E.J. Whaley, solutions engineer at GreatHorn. 

Attackers have long leaned on metamorphic and polymorphic malware techniques to make swift changes to the code in order to evade detection. It was only a matter of time before they started taking that philosophy to the scam delivery vehicles. This method is in contrast to what Whaley says is typical in most Trojan phishing email lures, where they'll stick to a single pattern with "slight customizations." Instead, these attacks are switching up subject lines, email content, email addresses, display name spoofs, and destination URLs. 

"Body content generally follows a pattern that confirms the receipt of a payment for an invoice but uses slightly different language to evade capture," Whaley says.

While the subject lines vary, they all seem to cluster around references to receipts or invoices. Sometimes the attacks are very targeted — using spoofed names of a fellow employee of the target — and sometimes they use random names, sent from numerous compromised email accounts. The bulk of the compromise accounts are coming from South American companies. 

The attackers are trying to trick users into downloading a Word template with a VBA downloader trojan embedded within. GreatHorn says the attack was detected in about one in 10 accounts in its user base.

Paid invoice attacks like these are increasingly at the top of phishers’ playbooks. Last year six of 10 phishing messages used some variation of "invoice" as its subject.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
97% of Americans Can't Ace a Basic Security Test
Steve Zurier, Contributing Writer,  5/20/2019
How Security Vendors Can Address the Cybersecurity Talent Shortage
Rob Rashotte, VP of Global Training and Technical Field Enablement at Fortinet,  5/24/2019
TeamViewer Admits Breach from 2016
Dark Reading Staff 5/20/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-7068
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7069
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have a type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7070
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .
CVE-2019-7071
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2019-7072
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-24
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2019.010.20069 and earlier, 2017.011.30113 and earlier version, and 2015.006.30464 and earlier have an use after free vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution .