Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

At Gartner Summit, Experts Question Security's Future

Analysts, sci-fi authors challenge security pros to rethink the status quo

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. -- Gartner IT Security Summit 2008 -- You think you have security problems now? Just wait till 2018 and beyond, industry visionaries say.

Analysts, experts, and some science fiction writers took the long view here this morning as they shared their predictions and scenarios for the world of IT security, raising challenges that ranged from users' new personal devices to hackers from other planets.

The presentations were widely varied, but their theme was the same: Question everything you know about security, and prepare for the unexpected.

"Somewhere along the way, it has become fashionable to move away from long-term planning in IT, and particularly in security," said Ken McGee, vice president and fellow at Gartner, in his opening presentation for the three-day event. "We're here to tell you that you can do long-term planning, and you should."

McGee took a closer look at some of the megatrends affecting IT security, including a slowdown in spending and a general recharacterization of the relationship between the security department and the business.

IT spending will grow only about 6.1 percent in 2008, and security is frequently being cut back along with the rest of IT, McGee observed. "There is nothing on the radar screen for this decade that would suggest that IT will be anything more than a slow-growth industry," McGee said.

These cutbacks come at a difficult time, when most business' expectations for IT have outstripped the department's ability to deliver on a wide range of projects. "It's time to rethink the way IT projects are managed," McGee said. "Anyone in the company can't just run out and hire people whenever they want. But in most companies, anybody can request a project from IT."

Corporate executives and IT people need to identify their most contentious issues and work them out, McGee said. "When companies cut back on security, executives say they understand the risks, but when you ask them to sign something that says so, they won't do it. There needs to be better accountability on the business side for the decisions that are made."

But Scott Petry, director of enterprise security and compliance at Google and founder of the Google-acquired security company Postini, said companies need to stop telling users what they can't do and start embracing the trend toward more numerous and sophisticated personal devices.

"We need to reassess our hard boundaries and recognize that the boundaries between work and home life are blurring," Petry said. Google has an open environment in which employees can view nearly any data in the company, and employees are allowed to spend 20 percent of their time working on any project they wish, as long as it benefits Google.

In a third session, three science fiction authors took the security discussion to an even more futuristic level. "I think we have to look at the possibility that there might be a world where there is no security," said Greg Bear, a Hugo and Nebula-winning author who has advised several government agencies. "You just need to assume that someone is watching you."

Bear noted that "for the concept of quantum computing to work, the theory of multiple worlds has to be true. And if that's the case, then it's possible that we may be hacked from other worlds as well as our own."

The sci-fi writers offered up a wide range of future security scenarios, including one in which the World Wide Web gains consciousness and begins to act independently, or in which machines are able to harness the same defensive capabilities as living beings.

"Expect the unexpected, and always assume that your enemy is smarter than you are," Bear said. "Spend one day a week assuming that everything you know is wrong. Push your security vision beyond the limits of what you already know."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...