Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

9/7/2018
05:05 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Apple (Finally) Removes MacOS App Caught Stealing User Browser Histories

The fact that the app likely has been exfiltrating data for years is "rather f#@&'d" up, says the security researcher who reported the issue to Apple one month ago.

Apple has removed a top-rated ad blocker from its official Mac App Store after a security researcher discovered it to be quietly collecting and sending detailed user-browsing histories to a domain based in China.

The $4.99 Adware Doctor was until Friday morning listed as the fourth highest-selling app and top-grossing software product in the category of "paid utilities" in the Mac App store.

Its stated purpose is to protect users from malware and having adware served on their browsers. But the app has also been silently exfiltrating browser histories and other sensitive data from systems on which it is installed, says Patrick Wardle, founder and chief research officer of Digita Security and creator of Objective-See, a website for Mac security tools. 

"It also collects system info, a list of the user's currently running processes, and also certain types of files that users have downloaded. It tries to access the user's App Store history — but I believe a bug causes this to fail," he says.

In a blog post Friday, Wardle said he had contacted Apple about the issue one month ago and informed the company about the app's behavior. Even two years ago, in 2016, another security researcher had raised concerns about the same application trying to trick users into granting it administrative privileges on their devices, he said. But until Friday morning, Apple had not removed the app despite promising to investigate, Wardle said.

"There is rather a MASSIVE privacy issue here," Wardle wrote. "The fact that [the] application has been surreptitiously exfiltrating users' browsing history, possibly for years, is, to put it mildly, rather f#@&'d up!"

Apple did not offer any explanation for why it might have waited so long to act. But according to the company, the app has been removed and the issue, which allowed Adware Doctor to access and exfiltrate privacy-sensitive content like browser history and cookies, has been mitigated in Mojave, the next version of the macOS.

A quick check by Dark Reading shows that the app is indeed no longer available for download from the app store for US users, at least.

Wardle, a macOS security veteran and frequent presenter at major security conferences like Black Hat, said he decided to investigate Adware Doctor after another security researcher tweeted an alert about the application stealing private user files last month.

After purchasing a copy of Adware Doctor, Wardle said he used a combination of static and dynamic analysis and quickly found the application to be behaving in a manner completely inconsistent with its stated purpose. Wardle discovered that when a user gives the application permission — by clicking OK — to remove extensions, cookies, and caches from his or her browser, the app ends up surreptitiously stealing the user's browser history.

Apple apps downloaded from the company's official Mac application stores typically are sandboxed, meaning that it is constrained in the kinds of files and user information it can access, Wardle said.

But since Adware Doctor is a malware detection and removal tool, it needs access to user data and files not normally available to other applications. When the application is first launched, it asks the user for permission to access files in his or her home directory and all files and directories under it so the files can be inspected for malware. Once a user has granted that permission, the tool — like any anti-malware product — has free access to files on the devices.

In Adware Doctor's case, however, the app has been using the access to collect and exfiltrate data. "While some (such as a process list), perhaps have a legitimate reason for being collected by an anti-malware or anti-adware product, others such as the user's browsing history seem to be a blatant violation of the user's privacy," Wardle noted.

According to Apple, the issue has been mitigated in the next release of macOS via a sandboxing mechanism that ensures an app won't be able to access privacy-sensitive content after a user grants it permission to the home directory.

The fact that an app like this was allowed on Apple's official app store — supposedly the most secure source for Mac software — should be a wake-up call for the company, says Matt Lock, director of sales engineering at Varonis.

"This isn't the first time an app has collected data for questionable reasons, and it will not be the last," he says. "The irony is that consumers downloaded the app to reduce adware, but got stuck with spyware in the process."

Related Content:

 

Black Hat Europe returns to London Dec. 3-6, 2018, with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
sopiabrown
50%
50%
sopiabrown,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/25/2018 | 12:38:33 PM
Mac OS based systems
It is really great that in very recent Apple has been removed Mac OS application's history from the browser. It is undoubtedly very fruitful features must be utilized by all the users. They take other details from Apple customer support number to know in advance.
TeroH
50%
50%
TeroH,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/8/2018 | 5:34:04 PM
Still there...
Adware Doctor v1.2 by Li Wenhui is available in Europe. Is this the same app? If it is, then perhaps the other 5 apps from the same vendor should be examined also.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...