Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

2/28/2017
09:01 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Apparel, Food Delivery Hardest Hit by Online Fraud Attacks

New Forter-Merchant Research Council report confirms that EMV chips have moved fraudsters away from point-of-sale to online.

The anticipated shift of retail cybercrime to ecommerce in the wake of the EMV point-of-sale adoption has officially begun, with the online fraud attack rate increasing by 8.9% in 2016, a new study shows. 

Attacks against apparel companies rose 69.9% in 2016 and attacks against food delivery companies jumped 49.8%, compared with the year before, according to the research released today by Forter in conjunction with the Merchant Research Council.

Domestic orders have also shown a notable rise in fraud attack rate, becoming 79% riskier than they were in 2015. This has had a direct impact on the bottom line risk, resulting in a shift from $2.70 at risk per $100 of sales in Q4 2015, to $4.98 in Q4 2016.

The study collected data on the attack rate, aggregated by yearly quarters. The researchers define the attack rate as the average dollars at risk out of every $100 of sales.

"Now that the fraudsters have been pushed online, it’s much tougher to steal high-priced goods like jewelry or Rolex watches," says Michael Reitblat, CEO at Forter, a fraud detection firm. "In the past they would have gone for luxury items, but now it’s easier to attack smaller, cheaper items like apparel."

Reitblat adds that the same principle holds true with the increased cybercrime in the food delivery sector, especially now that the fraudsters have access to service-based tools that make it easier for them to use one stolen credit card to set up fraudulent websites that can steal hundreds of orders.

"What they do is use a stolen credit card to set up a fake account on a website or Facebook account," Reitblat explains. "Then they will use that stolen credit card for other, high-volume fraudulent transactions. So they’ll set themselves as a third party to GrubHub, for example, take your money and still won’t pay GrubHub."

While it’s true that fraudulent activity has moved online, the shift is still in its early stages, notes Randy Vanderhoof, director of the U.S. Payments Forum.

"I think it will be really interesting to see what the numbers are in another two years once transition to EMV chips has been fully implemented," Vanderhoof says. "I think that the retailers that do business both in physical stores and online need to be careful. They need an integrated fraud security strategy and can’t let their guard down in their physical stores."

Forter's Reitblat says retailers must continue to invest in security technology such as behavioral analytics to track fraud before it happens. He also thinks retailers will deploy two-factor authentication and use biometrics as the technology becomes more mature. 

"We’re also working with a lot of retailers to share fraud data with us so if we see a new attack method, we can warn the retailers," Reitblat says. 

Related Content:

Steve Zurier has more than 30 years of journalism and publishing experience, most of the last 24 of which were spent covering networking and security technology. Steve is based in Columbia, Md. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
GitHub Named in Capital One Breach Lawsuit
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2019
The Mainframe Is Seeing a Resurgence. Is Security Keeping Pace?
Ray Overby, Co-Founder & President at Key Resources, Inc.,  8/15/2019
The Flaw in Vulnerability Management: It's Time to Get Real
Jim Souders, Chief Executive Officer at Adaptiva,  8/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5034
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
An exploitable information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Weave Legacy Pairing functionality of Nest Cam IQ Indoor version 4620002. A set of specially crafted weave packets can cause an out of bounds read, resulting in information disclosure. An attacker can send packets to trigger this vuln...
CVE-2019-5035
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
An exploitable information disclosure vulnerability exists in the Weave PASE pairing functionality of the Nest Cam IQ Indoor, version 4620002. A set of specially crafted weave packets can brute force a pairing code, resulting in greater Weave access and potentially full device control. An attacker c...
CVE-2019-5036
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
An exploitable denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the Weave error reporting functionality of the Nest Cam IQ Indoor, version 4620002. A specially crafted weave packets can cause an arbitrary Weave Exchange Session to close, resulting in a denial of service. An attacker can send a specially cr...
CVE-2019-8103
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2017.011.30143 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2015.006.30497 and earlier, and 2015.006.30498 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation ...
CVE-2019-8104
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-20
Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2019.012.20035 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2017.011.30143 and earlier, 2017.011.30142 and earlier, 2015.006.30497 and earlier, and 2015.006.30498 and earlier have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. Successful exploitation ...