Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

checkLoop 1checkLoop 2checkLoop 3

Zeus Bank Malware Surges On Facebook

Old threat makes a comeback, targeting Facebook users' bank credentials and more.

The Syrian Electronic Army: 9 Things We Know
(click image for larger view)
The Syrian Electronic Army: 9 Things We Know
Zeus malware, long popular with the cybercrime underground, has seen a resurgence in the first half of 2013, becoming a weapon of choice for attacks distributed via spam emails as well as social networks such as Facebook.

That finding comes from security firm Trend Micro, which has reported seeing a spike in attempted Zeus Trojan application infections beginning in February 2013 and peaking in May. Zeus malware targets personal and financial data stored on Windows PCs and is controlled via a "Zbot" botnet.

"Old threats like Zbot can always make a comeback because cybercriminals profit from these," said Jay Yaneza, senior technical manager at Trend Micro, in a blog post. "Peddling stolen banking and other personal information from users is a lucrative business in the underground market. Plus, these crooks can use your login credentials to initiate transactions in your account without your consent."

[ Want some good Facebook security news? Read Google, Facebook Told U.K.: We Won't Be Snoops. ]

Zeus also can press infected PCs into service as nodes in a botnet composed of similar "zombie" PCs. Such botnets might comprise hundreds or thousands of systems and be tapped by attackers -- or rented out -- to serve as spam email relays or malware attack launch pads, or to generate distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks.

Not all Zeus infections stem from spam emails. Criminal gangs also regularly post links to malicious websites that launch drive-by attacks that result in Zeus installations. Recent attack campaigns have involved links on supposed NFL fan pages on Facebook, as well as e-commerce sites selling fake Nike shoes, according to Eric Feinberg, founder of the advocacy group Fans Against Kounterfeit Enterprise (FAKE).

"If you really want to hack someone, the easiest place to start is a fake Facebook profile -- it's so simple, it's stupid," Feinberg told The New York Times.

According to Trend Micro, the recent spike in Zeus activity has largely involved two variants of the malware: Citadel, which first appeared in 2011 and is apparently the brainchild of Russian and Ukrainian programmers who worked with source code published by Zeus' developer; and Gameover, which is designed to steal bank and credit card details and has been distributed via massive spam campaigns.

Zeus first shot to cybercrime fame in 2006, gaining notoriety as king of automated attack toolkits. Subsequent versions of the malware have continued to add features and functionality. The Zitmo variant, for example, was adapted in 2011 to target Android mobile devices and steal the one-time passwords -- known as mobile transaction authentication numbers (mTANs) -- used by many banks.

As of 2010, a basic version of Zeus was fetching $3,000, although add-ons could boost the purchase price to above $10,000. As those prices suggest, Zeus attacks can be lucrative. For example, the Eurograbber campaign, discovered last year, used Zeus malware to steal an estimated $47 million from more than 30,000 corporate and private banking customers across Europe.

Many different, unconnected Zeus botnets are typically running at any given time. The Zeus Tracker project, for example, which counts Zeus command-and-control (C&C) servers, currently reports that it's tracking 800 such servers. But related malware variants used by the attackers are detected by antivirus software only about 38% of the time. That low detection rate is typically due to the malware being polymorphic, meaning that the attack code is regularly repackaged so that it remains functionally equivalent but doesn't match known-file signatures.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19777
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
stb_image.h (aka the stb image loader) 2.23, as used in libsixel and other products, has a heap-based buffer over-read in stbi__load_main.
CVE-2019-19778
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
An issue was discovered in libsixel 1.8.2. There is a heap-based buffer over-read in the function load_sixel at loader.c.
CVE-2019-16777
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Versions of the npm CLI prior to 6.13.4 are vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Overwrite. It fails to prevent existing globally-installed binaries to be overwritten by other package installations. For example, if a package was installed globally and created a serve binary, any subsequent installs of pa...
CVE-2019-16775
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Versions of the npm CLI prior to 6.13.3 are vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Write. It is possible for packages to create symlinks to files outside of thenode_modules folder through the bin field upon installation. A properly constructed entry in the package.json bin field would allow a package publi...
CVE-2019-16776
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Versions of the npm CLI prior to 6.13.3 are vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Write. It fails to prevent access to folders outside of the intended node_modules folder through the bin field. A properly constructed entry in the package.json bin field would allow a package publisher to modify and/or gain...
checkLoop 4