Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

RSA Details SecurID Attack Mechanics

EMC won't say what the attackers took, but it did explain how they penetrated RSA and stole information about its two-factor SecurID authentication system.

10 Massive Security Breaches
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: 10 Massive Security Breaches
EMC's RSA division has that it was compromised by a spear-phishing attack -- aka spoof emails -- that used a zero-day Adobe Flash vulnerability. But RSA still offered no details on the information the attacker stole.

Here's how the attack succeeded, according to what RSA reported Friday: The attacker sent two small batches of emails with "2011 Recruitment Plan" as the subject line to two small groups of EMC employees with an Excel spreadsheet attached, which at least some recipients executed. But the spreadsheet included an embedded Flash file that executed malicious code via a zero-day vulnerability, enabling the attacker to gain full access to the PC and install software to more easily control it remotely.

"The attacker in this case installed a customized remote administration tool known as Poison Ivy RAT variant," said Uri Rivner, head of new technologies in the consumer identity protection group at RSA, in a Friday blog post.

Rather than receiving commands from a control server, tools such as Poison Ivy pull commands from an external server. "This connectivity method makes them more difficult to detect, as the PC reaches out to the command and control rather than the other way around," he said. Poison Ivy has been used in numerous other attacks, including the Operation Aurora attack against Google in late 2009.

After penetrating EMC's network, the attacker targeted credentials for people with access to high-value information, aggregated that information, and then exported it via FTP to an external Web site, where it was downloaded and then erased -- evidence of the attacker hiding his or her tracks.

Rivner emphasized that RSA had been hit by an advanced persistent threat (APT) attack. "One cannot stress enough the point about APTs being, first and foremost, a new attack doctrine built to circumvent the existing perimeter and endpoint defenses," he said.

But many security experts have labeled "APT," at least in this case, as an exercise in spin, noting that threats that blend multiple attack modes, including social engineering, have been around for years.

"There is very little in this attack that is particularly sophisticated. The big question is, what are the defenses that would have prevented or reduced the impact of this attack?" said Rick Wanner at the SANS Internet Storm Center in an online post.

As noted, RSA's Rivnerk also offered no additional information on exactly what the attackers stole, saying only that "RSA made it clear that certain information was extracted."

That lack of specificity from RSA left many SecurID users preparing for the worst, which is that their two-factor authentication system can't be trusted.

Adobe has since patched the vulnerability exploited by the RSA attacker.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-20001
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.2.0, BinaryHeap is not panic-safe. The binary heap is left in an inconsistent state when the comparison of generic elements inside sift_up or sift_down_range panics. This bug leads to a drop of zeroed memory as an arbitrary type, which can result in a memory ...
CVE-2020-36317
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.49.0, String::retain() function has a panic safety problem. It allows creation of a non-UTF-8 Rust string when the provided closure panics. This bug could result in a memory safety violation when other string APIs assume that UTF-8 encoding is used on the sam...
CVE-2020-36318
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.49.0, VecDeque::make_contiguous has a bug that pops the same element more than once under certain condition. This bug could result in a use-after-free or double free.
CVE-2021-28875
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.50.0, read_to_end() does not validate the return value from Read in an unsafe context. This bug could lead to a buffer overflow.
CVE-2021-28876
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.52.0, the Zip implementation has a panic safety issue. It calls __iterator_get_unchecked() more than once for the same index when the underlying iterator panics (in certain conditions). This bug could lead to a memory safety violation due to an unmet safety r...