Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


New Malware Puts Nasty Spin On Remote Control

Georbot Trojan steals remote-desktop configuration files to provide surreptitious access to targeted PCs, including recording audio and video.

Security researchers have discovered malware that scans PCs for remote-access or remote-desktop-configuration files, which indicates installed software that can be used to remotely control the computer. The malware, dubbed Georbot, then steals related credential files and transmits them to attackers, providing direct access to the machines using the built-in remote access tools.

The Georbot malware's capabilities were discovered in January by security researchers at antivirus firm ESET. "One of the analysts in our virus laboratories noticed that it was communicating with a domain belonging to the Georgian government [the country in southwestern Asia, not the U.S. state] in order to retrieve updates," according to a report that ESET released Wednesday. Notably, the malware connects with that server anytime it fails to connect to its designated command-and-control server.

ESET said that Georbot has been in circulation since at least September 2010, and had been updated at least 1,000 times. "It should be also noted that the Data Exchange Agency of the Ministry of Justice of Georgia and its national CERT were fully aware of the situation as early as 2011 and, parallel to their own--still ongoing--monitoring, have cooperated with ESET on this matter," according to the report.

[ We're largely to blame for hacktivists' success. Read more: Anonymous Hackers' Helper: IT Security Neglect. ]

Other antivirus companies besides ESET had also spotted the malware, although none appeared to have taken a close look at what it was doing. Two months ago, however, ESET shared samples of Georbot with security companies, which has led to improved detection rates for the malware. Even so, the malware continues to be active, with ESET saying it saw the most recent variants launched Monday.

ESET said it's gained access to the botnet's control panel, allowing it to count the number of affected machines, their locations, as well as to deduce exactly which types of commands the information-stealing Trojan application can generate. For example, the malware can be used to record audio and video feeds from exploited PCs. ESET planned to detail those findings Wednesday in a meeting with the Georgian government. Until then, Pierre-Marc Bureau, a Montreal-based senior malware researcher at ESET, said in an interview that he wasn't prepared to speculate as to who might be behind the malware, or why certain people might have been targeted.

How common is this type of malware? "It's not the first time that I've seen it happen, but it's not as common as stealing credentials for FTP sites or website credentials," said Bureau, largely because those other types of credentials can be built into worms and used to launch automated attacks against large numbers of targets. "[Georbot] is something that wouldn't be used at a large scale, but in a more targeted attack," he said. If successful, however, such an attack would give an attacker full, remote access to the targeted PC.

By publishing its research into Georbot, however, won't ESET drive whoever's behind the botnet to make it go dark? "We hope so, yes," said Bureau. "We're continuing to monitor the situation, and we hope that by publishing this paper we help educate users, but if this can help some Internet providers to take on these servers, that will be a good ending."

Concern over attackers exploiting remote-control access tools on PCs has been growing, not just due to malware such as Georbot. Notably, proof-of-concept exploit code has already been published for a Remote Desktop Protocol vulnerability patched last week by Microsoft. Meanwhile, Symantec earlier this year warned pcAnywhere users to disable their installations, or else protect them with layered security, after discovering that in 2006 attackers had stolen the source code for the application, which they might be able to use to spot unknown, exploitable vulnerabilities.

Beyond hoping that antivirus scanners spot malware such as Georbot, or exploits targeting specific remote-access tools, what can businesses do to protect themselves?

"I don't think it makes sense for any company to have their remote-desktop services or pcAnywhere exposed directly to the Internet," said Bureau. "Multiple security layers should be applied, such as network filters to only allow access from specific locations, VPN for remote workers--or someone who needs to access internal data from an external location in an emergency--and also to secure your endpoints, and ensure they're patched. These are the standard procedures. I know it's easy to enumerate them, but harder to put them into practice."

Secure Sockets Layer isn't perfect, but there are ways to optimize it. The new Web Encryption That Works supplement from Dark Reading shows four places to start. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
3/22/2012 | 12:24:58 PM
re: New Malware Puts Nasty Spin On Remote Control
Well this just stinks! I am a network admin, and I take care of more than one network, which is more than one location and more than one company. I do this at night while most normal people are sleeping, and you can bet your behind I do this via remote control tools. I've not clicked the links in this article so I have only read this, but without question other than "monitoring" which you can rest assured I am on who does monitor and log everything so that part of my job which is very time consuming is done. I really need a sure fire way to ensure I am protected from this, and I do have current counter measures in place that if this article is correct, will provide protection against this attack, but I will not disclose publicly, but should someone else need this type of protection, I am for hire. :-)
I would think any company of any size with any number of online computers need and want remote access. Even a one man show will at times need access to data located at the office and unless they want to revert back to sneaker-net, remote access is needed. If you don't have remote access again, I am for hire. :-)
User Rank: Apprentice
3/22/2012 | 6:06:03 AM
re: New Malware Puts Nasty Spin On Remote Control
Any kind of malware's can be get rid of using Comodo Antivirus.
Andrew Hornback
Andrew Hornback,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/22/2012 | 12:29:49 AM
re: New Malware Puts Nasty Spin On Remote Control
At the root of all of this, this GeorBot seems to give an attacker a way of targeting specific users for their attack, rather than just picking random systems and going after full control of a system as opposed to shutting down or taking over specific services.

It's also somewhat amusing that the security research interviewed for this article is talking about ways of preventing this exploit at the end and how they are easier enumerated than accomplished. His recommendations are quite basic, quite simple and should be the first steps that anyone responsible for security on a network should take to assure the integrity of that network. Securing endpoints and making sure that they have all relevant patches is not hard with modern tools and is a requirement for a number of different legal compliance situations. But no matter what route you choose to secure systems, monitoring is an absolute must.

Andrew Hornback
InformationWeek Contributor
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/5/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). A dangerous AT command was made available even though it is unused. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200010 (June 2020).
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS software before 2020-06-01. Local users can cause a denial of service because checking of the userdata partition is mishandled. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200014 (June 2020).
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via a custom AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200007 (June 2020).
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 9, and 10 (MTK chipsets). Code execution can occur via an MTK AT command handler buffer overflow. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200008 (June 2020).
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 9 and 10 (MTK chipsets). An AT command handler allows attackers to bypass intended access restrictions. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-200009 (June 2020).