Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

10/31/2007
07:26 AM
50%
50%

Hole-y Leopard!

A first-hand look at the problems with the new OS X OS's firewall

3:26 PM -- I did a fresh install of Mac OS X Leopard the other night. I was looking forward to all of the new features, most of which I didn't even know about. I like running the latest and greatest versions, so Leopard seemed like a good fit.

Apple had been advertising how much more secure Leopard was (cue Kanye West's song "Stronger" but with Leopard being "harder, better, faster, stronger"), but within days of its release, security researchers were already picking it apart. I've always been happy with the firewalling within Mac OS X, using ipfw. The firewall GUI has always been lackluster, but manual configuration is easy because of ipfw's simplified rule language (See Leopard With Chinks in Its Armour.)

But researchers say Leopard's firewall is full of holes. (If you were near my office yesterday, you would have heard me yelling about how their test must be flawed.) So, like other claims against something I like, I recreated the test myself. I set up an old laptop with Xubuntu and connected it to my Mac Book Pro with a crossover cable. After setting up the IPs and confirming they could ping and SSH into each other, I set forth to prove the claims wrong.

But it turns out they were right. The "set access for specific services and applications" firewall setting might as well be the "allow all incoming connections" default. If you thought setting this parameter and allowing SSH would only permit TCP port 22 inbound, you're wrong (as was I). In his test, Jürgen Schmidt used netcat to listen on a local port, and the firewall opened up to allow access to that port. When the firewall setting was changed to "block all incoming connections," access to the netcat listener was blocked. But how many people want to enable SSH, Web sharing, Bonjour, or Remote Desktop on their Leopard machines?

The firewall settings do nothing for UDP. Even at "block all incoming connections," I was able to connect from my Xubuntu laptop to the NTP daemon (ntpd) on my Leopard laptop. I still haven't figured out why Leopard has an NTP daemon accepting connections, but the fact that it is accessible even when all incoming connections are supposed to be blocked is more disturbing.

The firewall logs used to be stored in "/var/log/ipfw.log" in Tiger (Mac OS X 10.4), but are now stored in "/var/log/appfirewall.log." I guess this change is because the Leopard firewall has been enhanced to be application-aware, which is why it opened up to the netcat listener. The other big change is the rules are no longer visible by running "sudo ipfw list." The only rule listed by ipfw when "block all incoming connections" is set is "65535 allow ip from any to any." That's essentially an anti-firewall rule: It does nothing. Or in other words, it allows everything.

There is hope, though. WaterRoof is a GUI frontend to ipfw for Mac OS X and it works well with Leopard. The only issue I've found is that it still expects the logs to be in "/var/log/ipfw.log," so clicking on the view logs button comes up empty. For those of you squeamish about configuring the firewall, the pre-configured rule sets are solid and will work for you out of the box. Just tune the Leopard firewall setting to "allow all incoming connections" and manage everything with WaterRoof. You will have to build your own UDP firewall rules, because there are none included by default. UDP rules tend to get sticky, so at a minimum, deny inbound UDP for ports 123, 5353, and 5454 to cover possible vulnerabilities in NTP and Bonjour.

Even though the firewall may have been flawed to begin with in Leopard, I'm confident that I'm well-protected from network-based threats, using my custom rules. If you're thinking about upgrading, heed the warnings about Leopard's firewall: It's not on by default, and even at its most restrictive setting, it still lets in UDP, and the daemons listening on UDP ports may be vulnerable.

– John H. Sawyer is a security geek on the IT Security Team at the University of Florida. He enjoys taking long war walks on the beach and riding pwnies. When he's not fighting flaming, malware-infested machines or performing autopsies on blitzed boxes, he can usually be found hanging with his family, bouncing a baby on one knee and balancing a laptop on the other. Special to Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-3493
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
The overlayfs implementation in the linux kernel did not properly validate with respect to user namespaces the setting of file capabilities on files in an underlying file system. Due to the combination of unprivileged user namespaces along with a patch carried in the Ubuntu kernel to allow unprivile...
CVE-2021-3492
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
Shiftfs, an out-of-tree stacking file system included in Ubuntu Linux kernels, did not properly handle faults occurring during copy_from_user() correctly. These could lead to either a double-free situation or memory not being freed at all. An attacker could use this to cause a denial of service (ker...
CVE-2020-2509
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QTS and QuTS hero. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in a compromised application. We have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 4.5.2.1566 Build 20210202 and later Q...
CVE-2020-36195
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-17
An SQL injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running Multimedia Console or the Media Streaming add-on. If exploited, the vulnerability allows remote attackers to obtain application information. QNAP has already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions of Multimedia C...
CVE-2021-29445
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-16
jose-node-esm-runtime is an npm package which provides a number of cryptographic functions. In versions prior to 3.11.4 the AES_CBC_HMAC_SHA2 Algorithm (A128CBC-HS256, A192CBC-HS384, A256CBC-HS512) decryption would always execute both HMAC tag verification and CBC decryption, if either failed `JWEDe...