Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

4/4/2011
04:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Comodo Hacker' Says He Acted Alone

The plot thickens: In an effort to back up his claims, alleged hacker dumps apparent evidence of pilfered database from breached Comodo reseller, as well as Mozilla add-on site certificate

Comodo, a website certificate authority, revealed that nine SSL certificates were issued for fraudulent websites posing as domains for high-profile sites. Security researchers hope the incident will call attention to a certificate process they say is riddled with holes.

The certificates were issued for mail.google.com, www.google.com, login. skype.com, addons.mozilla. org, login.live.com, and global trustee, and three different ones for login.yahoo .com, according to Comodo. They can be used to impersonate Google, Yahoo, Skype, Microsoft, and Mozilla and to wage man-in-the-middle attacks, in which an attacker listens in on communications, such as Skype calls. The Mozilla certificate could let attackers establish a phony Firefox update that downloads malicious code to Firefox browsers fooled by its "certified" domain.

The incident started with the hack of one of Comodo's European resellers, which validates and issues SSL certificate requests. The attackers used stolen credentials from the reseller authority to issue the rogue certificates, which were revoked by Comodo once discovered. Comodo says there has been no sign of the certificates being used, and that its own root keys, intermediate certificate authorities, and hardware weren't compromised. Browsers with the Online Certificate Status Protocol feature will automatically block the certificates.

Whodunnit

The situation took another twist when someone claiming to be a 21-year-old Iranian hacker said he attacked the Comodo reseller, which he named as GlobalTrust. When critics questioned the ability of a lone hacker to pull this off, he fired back by posting what appears to be the reseller's database of 800 encrypted passwords.

Rambling manifestos by the alleged hacker posted on Pastebin, much of it in broken English, raise more questions and appear to shoot down Comodo's claim that the attack might be nation-state sponsored, most likely out of Iran, since the IP addresses involved came from that country.

"This could be a smokescreen trying to make it look like a lone gunman," says Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer of F-Secure. "Whoever posted it to Pastebin did have access to those original systems, so whoever is behind the posts was also behind the actual attack."

Regardless of who did it, security experts say the rogue certificates could still be in use, possibly in stealthy, one-off attack scenarios. "The scary thing is that it's hard to detect if they are still out there," says Mike Zusman, managing principal consultant at Intrepidus Group, who demonstrated similar attacks nearly two years ago at DefCon. Attackers wouldn't leave a certificate sitting on the Internet so that anyone could locate it, but instead "would use it in very targeted, specific attacks against one user or a subset of users," Zusman says.

The attack has put the certificate authority registration process under scrutiny again. "This is obviously a very serious case," says Hypponen, adding that he'd love to see it as a wake-up call for certificate authorities to shore up their systems, and for browser vendors to carefully look at their resellers.

Comodo's model of leaving resellers free to issue certificates without Comodo's validation left the door open for abuse. The bad guys had free rein, Hypponen says.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
News
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Commentary
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-22668
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-16
Delta Industrial Automation CNCSoft ScreenEditor Versions 1.01.28 (with ScreenEditor Version 1.01.2) and prior are vulnerable to an out-of-bounds read while processing project files, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2021-29039
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-16
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Asset module's categories administration page in Liferay Portal 7.3.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the site name.
CVE-2020-16632
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
A XSS Vulnerability in /uploads/dede/action_search.php in DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 allows an authenticated user to execute remote arbitrary code via the keyword parameter.
CVE-2021-32073
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-15
DedeCMS V5.7 SP2 contains a CSRF vulnerability that allows a remote attacker to send a malicious request to to the web manager allowing remote code execution.
CVE-2021-33033
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
The Linux kernel before 5.11.14 has a use-after-free in cipso_v4_genopt in net/ipv4/cipso_ipv4.c because the CIPSO and CALIPSO refcounting for the DOI definitions is mishandled, aka CID-ad5d07f4a9cd. This leads to writing an arbitrary value.