Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

3/5/2010
12:45 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Another Botnet Gets Dismantled, But This Time With Arrests

Massive Mariposa botnet is the latest criminal network to fall as researchers and law enforcement start to work more closely, aggressively

SAN FRANCISCO -- RSA Conference 2010 -- For the second time in weeks, a major botnet has been decapitated -- but this time investigators have arrested the alleged operators of the criminal network.

A team made up of law enforcement officials in Spain, the FBI, Panda Security, Defence Intelligence, and Georgia Tech cut off the so-called Mariposa botnet's command and control (C&C) infrastructure in one day in December, ultimately leading to the arrest of the alleged head botmaster and two of his partners earlier this month by Spanish authorities.

Mariposa was a massive global botnet with close to 13 million infected machines in more than 190 countries -- including those of half of all Fortune 1000 firms. The botnet harvested banking credentials, credit card information, account information from social networking sites and online email services, and other usernames and passwords.

Mariposa's demise follows that of Waledac, the reinvented version of the infamous Storm botnet, which was shut down last month by Microsoft, Shadowserver, researchers from Europe, the University of Washington, Symantec, and law enforcement. Waledac's takedown was highlighted by an unprecedented federal court order secured by Microsoft that required VeriSign to cut off 277 Internet .com domains that were serving as the connections between Waledac's C&C servers and around 60,000 to 80,000 bots or infected machines it had recruited to spew up to 1.5 billion spam messages a day.

Why the sudden surge in botnet takedowns? "We're now getting law enforcement involved in the earlier stages and discarding jurisdictional interests and self interests just to get the job done," says Paul Royal, a research scientist with the Georgia Tech Information Security Center, who worked on the Mariposa shutdown doing malware analysis. "We're all sick of the problem."

Pedro Bustamante, senior research adviser at Panda Security, says the researchers obtained a court order to monitor the Mariposa operators' IP addresses and ISP records, and to tap into their mobile records as part of the investigation. They turned over their findings to law enforcement after six months of gathering evidence on the head botmaster, nicknamed "Netkairo" and "hamlet1917," and his partners, "Ostiator" and "Johnyloleante," all of whom were arrested.

"This story has a happy ending. The botnet was shut down, and justice was served [against the bad guys]," Bustamante says.

But Mariposa was the tip of the iceberg, he says. "We still have a big problem that this is one of many botnets. This one was big enough to attract the attention of everyone," he says. "But there are still hundreds of thousands of botnets small enough to not draw attention."

While the Mariposa operators were fairly smart in some of the methods the used, they did commit a few fatal errors that led investigators to their trail. "They were careless in a few aspects -- they used a limited number of nicknames in email accounts that we were able to track ... and for the command and control servers," Bustamante says. "And we correlated that information with all the login IP and source IP information around different underground forums ... we got good profiles on them."

The alleged botnet operators were not skilled hackers, but the botnet infrastructure itself was fairly sophisticated: It used a custom protocol with encryption over UDP, and even later used a port typically associated with DNS, Port 53, to get malware in and out of infected machines' networks. "When they switched to Port 53, we saw a lot more compromised machines," says Georgia Tech's Royal. "The problem was that a firewall would confirm the destination was Port 53, but not perform the deep packet inspection to confirm it was DNS."

Like with Waledac, the Mariposa C&C takedown required a court order for those domains in VeriSign's .com purview. There were other domains, including .biz, and some Chinese domains, according to Panda Labs' Bustamante.

The team coordinated a simultaneous shutdown of the C&C domains on Dec. 23 to catch the botmasters off-guard. But that didn't stop the Mariposa operators from trying to resuscitate their botnet: According to Bustamante, one of the operators bribed his service provider with 500 Euros to reactivate one of his C&C domains in order to take back a portion of Mariposa. "He used it to perform a DDoS attack on one of the Mariposa Working Group [members]," Bustamante says.

Then he made the mistake of connecting to the botnet from his home without logging on anonymously to the VPN. "We could see when he was connecting from home," Bustamante says. "He got a little sloppy."

Even after the arrests, the same Mariposa botnet operator who was released under surveillance tried to recover the botnet again from his home IP address. "He made the same mistakes and connected directly to it from his home IP," he says.

Mariposa infected machines via email and Web exploits, as well as via instant messaging and USB drives. "It was very effective in spreading via P2P USB drives and IM links," namely via MSN Messenger, Bustamante says. "IM was one of the most effective ... it would send to all of your contacts with a social engineering approach that would make your contacts want to click on the link and then they would get infected."

Meanwhile, authorities could be making further arrests in the Mariposa case. And this won't be last team-effort botnet takedown, Royal says.

Panda Labs is posting a report with more details on the Mariposa case.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities and attack visibility drove some significant changes in enterprise cybersecurity strategies over the past year. Dark Reading's 2021 Strategic Security Survey showed that many organizations are staying the course regarding the use of a mix of attack prevention and threat detection technologies and practices for dealing with cyber threats.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-16060
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-15
Mitsubishi Electric SmartRTU devices allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (directory listing and source code) via a direct request to the /web URI.
CVE-2018-16061
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-15
Mitsubishi Electric SmartRTU devices allow XSS via the username parameter or PATH_INFO to login.php.
CVE-2021-27561
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-15
Yealink Device Management (DM) 3.6.0.20 allows command injection as root via the /sm/api/v1/firewall/zone/services URI, without authentication.
CVE-2020-4951
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-15
IBM Cognos Analytics 11.1.7 and 11.2.0 contains locally cached browser data, that could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information.
CVE-2021-28021
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-15
Buffer overflow vulnerability in function stbi__extend_receive in stb_image.h in stb 2.26 via a crafted JPEG file.