Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

12/27/2018
10:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Toxic Data: How 'Deepfakes' Threaten Cybersecurity

The joining of 'deep learning' and 'fake news' makes it possible to create audio and video of real people saying words they never spoke or things they never did.

"Fake news" is one of the most widely used phrases of our times. Never has there been such focus on the importance of being able to trust and validate the authenticity of shared information. But its lesser-understood counterpart, "deepfake," poses a much more insidious threat to the cybersecurity landscape — far more dangerous than a simple hack or data breach.

Deepfake activity was mostly limited to the artificial intelligence (AI) research community until late 2017, when a Reddit user who went by "Deepfakes" — a portmanteau of "deep learning" and "fake" — started posting digitally altered pornographic videos. This machine learning technique makes it possible to create audio and video of real people saying and doing things they never said or did. But Buzzfeed brought more visibility to Deepfakes and the ability to digitally manipulate content when it created a video that supposedly showed President Barack Obama mocking Donald Trump. In reality, deepfake technology had been used to superimpose President Obama's face onto footage of Jordan Peele, the Hollywood filmmaker.  

This is just one example of a new wave of attacks that are growing quickly. They have the potential to cause significant harm to society overall and to organizations within the private and public sectors because they are hard to detect and equally hard to disprove.

The ability to manipulate content in such unprecedented ways generates a fundamental trust problem for consumers and brands, for decision makers and politicians, and for all media as information providers. The emerging era of AI and deep learning technologies will make the creation of deepfakes easier and more "realistic," to an extent where a new perceived reality is created. As a result, the potential to undermine trust and spread misinformation increases like never before.

To date, the industry has been focused on the unauthorized access of data. But the motivation behind and the anatomy of an attack has changed. Instead of stealing information or holding it ransom, a new breed of hackers now attempts to modify data while leaving it in place.

One study from Sonatype, a provider of DevOps-native tools, predicts that, by 2020, 50% of organizations will have suffered damage caused by fraudulent data and software. Companies today must safeguard the chain of custody for every digital asset in order to detect and deter data tampering.

The True Cost of Data Manipulation
There are many scenarios in which altered data can serve cybercriminals better than stolen information. One is financial gain: A competitor could tamper with financial account databases using a simple attack to multiply all the company's account receivables by a small random number. While a seemingly small variability in the data could go unnoticed by a casual observer, it could completely sabotage earnings reporting, which would ruin the company's relationship with its customers, partners, and investors.

Another motivation is changing perception. Nation-states could intercept news reports that are coming from an event and change those reports before they reach their destination. Intrusions that undercut data integrity have the potential to be a powerful arm of propaganda and misinformation by foreign governments.

Data tampering can also have a very real effect on the lives of individuals, especially within the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries. Attackers could alter information about the medications that patients are prescribed, instructions on how and when to take them, or records detailing allergies.

What do organizations need to consider to ensure that their digital assets remain safe from tampering? First, software developers must focus on building trust into every product, process, and transaction by looking more deeply into the enterprise systems and processes that store and exchange data. In the same way that data is backed up, mirrored, or encrypted, it continually needs to be validated to ensure its authenticity. This is especially critical if that data is being used by AI or machine learning applications to run simulations, to interact with consumers or partners, or for mission-critical decision-making and business operations.

The consequences of deepfake attacks are too large to ignore. It's no longer enough to install and maintain security systems in order to know that digital assets have been hacked and potentially stolen. The recent hacks on Marriott and Quora are the latest on the growing list of companies that have had their consumer data exposed. Now, companies also need to be able to validate the authenticity of their data, processes, and transactions.

If they can't, it's toxic.

Related Content:

Dirk Kanngiesser is the co-founder and CEO of Cryptowerk, a provider of data integrity solutions that make it easy to seal digital assets and prove their authenticity at scale using blockchain technology. With more than 25 years of technology leadership experience, Dirk has ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/21/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-4719
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
The client API authentication mechanism in Pexip Infinity before 10 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via a crafted request.
CVE-2020-15604
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
An incomplete SSL server certification validation vulnerability in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products could allow an attacker to combine this vulnerability with another attack to trick an affected client into downloading a malicious update instead of the expected one. CW...
CVE-2020-24560
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-24
An incomplete SSL server certification validation vulnerability in the Trend Micro Security 2019 (v15) consumer family of products could allow an attacker to combine this vulnerability with another attack to trick an affected client into downloading a malicious update instead of the expected one. CW...
CVE-2020-25596
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. x86 PV guest kernels can experience denial of service via SYSENTER. The SYSENTER instruction leaves various state sanitization activities to software. One of Xen's sanitization paths injects a #GP fault, and incorrectly delivers it twice to the guest. T...
CVE-2020-25597
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-23
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.14.x. There is mishandling of the constraint that once-valid event channels may not turn invalid. Logic in the handling of event channel operations in Xen assumes that an event channel, once valid, will not become invalid over the life time of a guest. Howeve...