Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

5/7/2019
08:00 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Russian Nation-State Group Employs Custom Backdoor for Microsoft Exchange Server

Turla hacking team abuses a legitimate feature of the Exchange server in order to hide out and access all of the target organization's messages.

A well-known Russian nation-state hacking group has been infiltrating the Microsoft Exchange email servers of its targeted victims since at least 2014 via a custom backdoor. 

Researchers at ESET say the so-called Turla group, aka Snake, has been hacking into victims' Microsoft Exchange servers and planting its sophisticated LightNeuron backdoor malware for cyber espionage purposes. Turla accesses the email systems by abusing Exchange Server's legitimate Transport Agent feature, which lets other software from Microsoft as well as third parties operate with Exchange, including spam-filtering tools. The feature lets these other applications process email messages coming and going from Exchange.

The LightNeuron backdoor for Exchange specifically allows Turla attackers to read and modify email messages, create and send their own messages, and block messages to users at the victim organization, ESET said in new research it revealed today. Turla previously had been seen targeting Outlook email clients, an attack method ESET detailed last August.

Matthieu Faou, a malware researcher with ESET, says he believes this is the first case of malware specifically targeting Exchange servers. "It's really similar to the Outlook backdoor, but it has access to all emails of the [victim] organization. It's focused on the main email server," he says.

And by employing Exchange's Transport Agent, the attackers can blend into the email environment. "This feature is something generally used by security products, such as anti-spam, to integrate into Microsoft Exchange," Faou says.

Turla's LightNeuron backdoor also operates a rare command-and-control method that uses email JPEG and PDF attachments to transport the commands - hidden within the attachments using steganography. "The attacker sends an email with the JPEG and PDF, and the content is decoded and decrypted by LightNeuron on the main Exchange server," Faou explains.

ESET found three victims of the LightNeuron attacks: a ministry of foreign affairs in Eastern Europe, a diplomatic organization in the Middle East, and an unidentified organization in Brazil. The Brazilian victim was discovered via a sample uploaded to VirusTotal, according to ESET's new report on the newly found Turla operation.

The victims were "the regular, usual targets" of Turla - diplomatic entities, Faou says.

LightNeuron uses a PowerShell script, called msinp.ps1, to install LightNeuron, and a remote administration tool, called IntelliAdmin, both of which were discovered on victim machines, according to ESET.

Security researchers at Kaspersky Lab have seen similar Exchange Server attacks and steganography-masked C2 activity by Turla, according to Kurt Baumgartner, a security researcher with Kaspersky. "They are active," he says, noting that Kaspersky Lab has previously written about the latest twist in Turla attacks in private reports to clients. "Their technical capabilities are impressive and they are really well-resourced ... They are a top-tier APT." 

No Patch
And like other so-called "living-off-the-land"-style attacks that abuse legitimate tools and software in a victim organization, there's no software patch to prevent a LightNeuron backdoor attack. ESET's Faou Microsoft could add some measures, such as enforcing a digital signature from a Transport Agent, for example, to ensure its legitimacy. But if an attacker steals the Exchange server's admin privileges, there's not much even more layers of security for Exchange can do, he says.

"It's not really a vulnerability. They are using legitimate functionality [of Exchange]," he says.

Microsoft was not available for comment at the time of this posting.

If an organization gets hit with Turla's LightNeuron, recovery is complicated. "Simply removing the two malicious files will break Microsoft Exchange, preventing everybody in the organization from sending and receiving emails. Before actually removing the files, the malicious Transport Agent should be disabled," ESET warned in its report on the attacks.

The problem, Faou says, is that Transport Agent is registered in the configuration of the server, so even if LightNeuron gets removed, Exchange will try to load it. "If it's unable to load the Transport Agent, it will totally break the main server so you cannot send or receive emails anymore," he says. "You need to administer Transport Agent properly before removing the files." ESET details the proper removal process in a whitepaper it also published today.

Turla attackers first must steal credentials to the Exchange Server to install LightNeuron. So enabling multifactor authentication among user accounts can help thwart the attack. In addition, ESET recommends monitoring the main Exchange Server, including installing endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools or other security monitoring.

The bottom line is many organizations typically don't monitor when a new Transport Agent gets installed on the Exchange Server. "That's the main problem. It's a feature that's not very well-known," Faou says.

Meanwhile, ESET said code snippets of the Windows version of LightNeuron indicate that Turla also created a Linux variant of the backdoor.

 

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
phillysteak
50%
50%
phillysteak,
User Rank: Apprentice
5/8/2019 | 3:10:26 PM
Did ESET share additional IOCs?
So I looked over the IntelliAdmin documentation, and it listens on default ports 2792 and 5900 per their official documentation, however the connection port can be changed. Did ESET share whether the standard IntelliAdmin ports were used for this Attack or if specific non-default connection ports were used, or if attackers kept changing the connection ports? That would be insightful intel as it could assist in identifying part of this attack through legitimate network communication channels.
I 'Hacked' My Accounts Using My Mobile Number: Here's What I Learned
Nicole Sette, Director in the Cyber Risk practice of Kroll, a division of Duff & Phelps,  11/19/2019
6 Top Nontechnical Degrees for Cybersecurity
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/21/2019
TPM-Fail: What It Means & What to Do About It
Ari Singer, CTO at TrustPhi,  11/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18610
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
An issue was discovered in manager.c in Sangoma Asterisk through 13.x, 16.x, 17.x and Certified Asterisk 13.21 through 13.21-cert4. A remote authenticated Asterisk Manager Interface (AMI) user without system authorization could use a specially crafted Originate AMI request to execute arbitrary syste...
CVE-2019-9536
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
Apple iPhone 3GS bootrom malloc implementation returns a non-NULL pointer when unable to allocate memory, aka 'alloc8'. An attacker with physical access to the device can install arbitrary firmware.
CVE-2013-6811
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the D-Link DSL-6740U gateway (Rev. H1) allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change administrator credentials or enable remote management services to (1) Custom Services in Port Forwarding...
CVE-2013-6880
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
Open redirect in proxy.php in FlashCanvas before 1.6 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the HTTP Referer header.
CVE-2019-15652
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-22
The web interface for NSSLGlobal SatLink VSAT Modem Unit (VMU) devices before 18.1.0 doesn't properly sanitize input for error messages, leading to the ability to inject client-side code.