Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

7/17/2017
02:45 PM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin
50%
50%

Poll: When Will You Pay Up for Ransomware?

When is it okay to pay the ransom demanded by malware? Take our poll to add your voice to the community wisdom.

Individuals and organizations that deploy ransomware and ask for money in exchange for decrypting your files are bad. Very bad. No one disputes that. But would you do business with them? What if it were your files at the other end of an encryption key? That's the gist of the question we're asking in our current Security Now poll -- a quick poll we'd love for you to take.

Take our quick poll on the right hand column of the site or right here.

It's easy to make sweeping statements like, "We don't negotiate with thieves and terrorists." It's much easier, of course, if you're not the one whose data has been encrypted, or if you have a rock-solid backup and recovery plan. In either case, it's an option that you can easily choose as one of the responses to our poll.

Now, you can also take the pragmatic approach and treat ransom as either a cost of doing business or just the price to be paid when bad things happen to good companies. The question then becomes how quickly and under which circumstances you're going to pay the criminals.

What do you think? Do principles win over pragmatism? When push comes to shove do you think that paying up to be up and running is the right answer? We want to know.

And we'd like to hear the reasoning behind your answer. Have you been part of an organization hit by ransomware? Do you have personal experience with this particular plague? The comments section for the poll is open, and it would be great to see some details (identifying information redacted, if appropriate) on the events that led to your poll response.

The poll will be live for another week or so -- it's going to be fascinating to see what the final totals are for the various answers. In the meantime, let's start the discussion: How ready are you to pay up?

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
Pen Testers Who Got Arrested Doing Their Jobs Tell All
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/5/2020
Browsers to Enforce Shorter Certificate Life Spans: What Businesses Should Know
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17366
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
An issue was discovered in NLnet Labs Routinator 0.1.0 through 0.7.1. It allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions or to cause a denial of service on dependent routing systems by strategically withholding RPKI Route Origin Authorisation ".roa" files or X509 Certificate...
CVE-2020-9036
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Jeedom through 4.0.38 allows XSS.
CVE-2020-15127
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Contour ( Ingress controller for Kubernetes) before version 1.7.0, a bad actor can shut down all instances of Envoy, essentially killing the entire ingress data plane. GET requests to /shutdown on port 8090 of the Envoy pod initiate Envoy's shutdown procedure. The shutdown procedure includes flip...
CVE-2020-15132
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
In Sulu before versions 1.6.35, 2.0.10, and 2.1.1, when the "Forget password" feature on the login screen is used, Sulu asks the user for a username or email address. If the given string is not found, a response with a `400` error code is returned, along with a error message saying that th...
CVE-2020-7298
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Unexpected behavior violation in McAfee Total Protection (MTP) prior to 16.0.R26 allows local users to turn off real time scanning via a specially crafted object making a specific function call.