Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

02:45 PM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin

Poll: When Will You Pay Up for Ransomware?

When is it okay to pay the ransom demanded by malware? Take our poll to add your voice to the community wisdom.

Individuals and organizations that deploy ransomware and ask for money in exchange for decrypting your files are bad. Very bad. No one disputes that. But would you do business with them? What if it were your files at the other end of an encryption key? That's the gist of the question we're asking in our current Security Now poll -- a quick poll we'd love for you to take.

Take our quick poll on the right hand column of the site or right here.

It's easy to make sweeping statements like, "We don't negotiate with thieves and terrorists." It's much easier, of course, if you're not the one whose data has been encrypted, or if you have a rock-solid backup and recovery plan. In either case, it's an option that you can easily choose as one of the responses to our poll.

Now, you can also take the pragmatic approach and treat ransom as either a cost of doing business or just the price to be paid when bad things happen to good companies. The question then becomes how quickly and under which circumstances you're going to pay the criminals.

What do you think? Do principles win over pragmatism? When push comes to shove do you think that paying up to be up and running is the right answer? We want to know.

And we'd like to hear the reasoning behind your answer. Have you been part of an organization hit by ransomware? Do you have personal experience with this particular plague? The comments section for the poll is open, and it would be great to see some details (identifying information redacted, if appropriate) on the events that led to your poll response.

The poll will be live for another week or so -- it's going to be fascinating to see what the final totals are for the various answers. In the meantime, let's start the discussion: How ready are you to pay up?

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/9/2020
4 Security Tips as the July 15 Tax-Day Extension Draws Near
Shane Buckley, President & Chief Operating Officer, Gigamon,  7/10/2020
Russian Cyber Gang 'Cosmic Lynx' Focuses on Email Fraud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user's password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authenticati...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
In Bareos Director less than or equal to 16.2.10, 17.2.9, 18.2.8, and 19.2.7, a heap overflow allows a malicious client to corrupt the director's memory via oversized digest strings sent during initialization of a verify job. Disabling verify jobs mitigates the problem. This issue is also patched in...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Bareos before version 19.2.8 and earlier allows a malicious client to communicate with the director without knowledge of the shared secret if the director allows client initiated connection and connects to the client itself. The malicious client can replay the Bareos director's cram-md5 challenge to...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
osquery before version 4.4.0 enables a priviledge escalation vulnerability. If a Window system is configured with a PATH that contains a user-writable directory then a local user may write a zlib1.dll DLL, which osquery will attempt to load. Since osquery runs with elevated privileges this enables l...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
An exploitable SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Admin Reports functionality of Glacies IceHRM v26.6.0.OS (Commit bb274de1751ffb9d09482fd2538f9950a94c510a) . A specially crafted HTTP request can cause SQL injection. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerabi...