Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

11/20/2019
04:52 PM
100%
0%

Patch 'Easily Exploitable' Oracle EBS Flaws ASAP: Onapsis

Organizations that have not yet applied a pair of months-old critical patches from Oracle for E-Business Suite are at risk of attacks on their financial systems, the application security firm says.

Two highly critical vulnerabilities in Oracle's E-Business Suite could put firms who haven't patched the flaws at risk of their systems getting hacked for illicit payments and other financial fraud.

Exploitation of the vulnerabilities could allow, for examples, an attacker to create a supplier in the system, add a bank account, and then issue payments to that supplier — all without approvals, according to cybersecurity firm Onapsis, which issued an advisory today that details the possible exploitation techniques attackers could employ against the EBS vulnerabilities.

Oracle fixed the EBS issues in its April 2019 critical patch update, but companies are often slow to apply such fixes, because they cannot risk disruption to their enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, a critical component of operations, says Juan-Perez Etchegoyen, chief technology officer for Onapsis.

The vulns, which affect two components of Oracle's EBS, are "easily exploitable," according to the official description in the National Vulnerability Database.

"We don't have any numbers, but we know that customers tend to take months to years to apply (ERP software) patches — that is a reality for ERP customers," he says. "They need to get into a more frequent cadence, because otherwise it is just too slow.".

The issues are the latest to plague enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, highly complex platforms that are often critical to business operations. The platforms have often been only used on-premise, with Internet capabilities added afterwards, exposing them to threats.

Onapsis, a provider of cybersecurity for enterprise applications, highlighted the issue more than 18 months ago, informing Oracle and then working withe company to fix the issues, Etchegoyen says. The company only released public information on the issue on Nov. 20, after Oracle customers were given time to patch.

The flaws — one in Oracle's General Ledger component (CVE-2019-2638) and another in Oracle Work in Progress component (CVE-2019-2633)  exploit Oracle's Thin Client Framework (TCF), which is installed by default on E-Business Suite systems. Anywhere from 15,000 to 21,000 companies, mostly small businesses but also including businesses with more than 10,000 employees, use the software. At least 1,500 companies also expose the software directly to the Internet, Etchegoyen says.

"We waited for a few months to issue a public notice, because it is such a great risk," he says. "If the system is accessible to a Web browser, then it is totally exposed. We decided to go public and increase the awareness."

'Full Control'

"Successfully exploiting any of these vulnerabilities could lead to full control over the entire Oracle EBS system," the company stated in its alert. "An attacker with this type of access could be detrimental in any application, but represents the worst case scenario when an ERP system is attacked." 

Because the vulnerabilities are in components that cannot be disabled, patching the system is critical. 

Onapsis notified Oracle of the security issues affecting the Thin Client Framework in September 2017, and the company issued a Critical Patch Update (CPU) fixing the issues on April 2018. By December 2018, Onapsis had found more vulnerabilities and a way of bypassing one of the previous patches, according to the company's advisory.

"Even though multiple bugs were fixed, starting with the April 2018 CPU up to the most recent CPU, the most critical patches have a CVSS score of 9.9," the advisory stated. "All of them could be exploited remotely and, depending on the patch applied, by an unauthenticated attacker."

The company expects that many businesses have not installed the patches, because ERP systems are often critical enough that the firms do not want a misstep.

"In our experience, we see this as an industry problem," Etchegoyen says. "Because the data is so critical, and often customized, changing or updating or applying patches can be a significant challenge for organizations."

Still, companies should not wait any longer and apply the fixes, he says.

Related Content

Check out The Edge, Dark Reading's new section for features, threat data, and in-depth perspectives. Today's top story: "How Medical Device Vendors Hold Healthcare Security for Ransom.'"

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.