Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

11/5/2016
08:20 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Microsoft Extends Support For Doomed EMET To July 2018

After that date, Microsoft officially will pull the plug on a toolkit that enterprises have used for years to protect against advanced threats.

Responding to what it described as customer feedback, Microsoft this week extended support for its widely used Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (EMET).

Instead of the originally planned end-of-life date of January 27, 2017, Microsoft will now continue to support the security toolkit through July 31, 2018.

After that date, there are no plans to offer security patches or other support for EMET, Microsoft principal program lead manager Jeffrey Sutherland announced in a blog post on the company’s TechNet this week.

"For improved security, our recommendation is for customers to migrate to Windows 10," Sutherland said.

The news is likely to come both as a surprise and a bit of relief for organizations using EMET. In announcing the extension, Microsoft for the first time also disclosed plans about finally pulling the plug on a technology that has served as an important bulwark against malicious exploits for many Windows organizations for the past. But its new deadline of July 2018 at least gives organizations 18 months to prepare for it.

Microsoft introduced EMET in 2009 as a measure to help enterprises mitigate and manage security vulnerabilities in Windows. Among other things, the company intended for the free toolkit to be used by administrators to activate settings and security features that were not always enabled by default in Windows and for locking down application access to OS features that they didn’t need.

At the time, Microsoft had described EMET as a necessary toolkit to help secure their Windows environment in the three- to four years it used to take the company to release new and updated Windows versions. Over the years, administrators have used the technology to thwart everything from ordinary exploits to advanced zero-day threats.

"It allowed us to interrupt and disrupt many of the common exploit kits employed by attackers at the time without waiting for the next Windows release," Sutherland said this week. The toolkit also offered the company a place to assess the functionality of new security features, he said.

Recently, though, EMET’s usefulness has diminished somewhat, as many of the security controls in the tool were integrated into successive Windows versions - most notably, Windows 10.

The stopgap nature of EMET’s features means that many of them are no longer robust enough to handle the challenges posed by current security exploits, Sutherland said. As a result, multiple, sometimes trivial, exploits are available in the wild currently for bypassing EMET, he noted.

Earlier this year, several security researchers warned of how some exploits from the Angler Exploit kit were completely getting around EMET. "This is something we are seeing for the first time in the wild, and we only observed it affecting systems running Windows 7," FireEye warned at that time.

The exploit allowed attackers to install TeslaCrypt ransomware on Windows 7 systems, prompting concern about the effectiveness of EMET in stopping such threats.

Sutherland noted other problems with EMET as well. Because EMET hooks into low-level areas of Windows in a manner not originally intended by developers, it has caused performance and reliability problems for systems running it. "And this presents an ongoing problem for customers since every OS or application update can trigger performance and reliability issues," due to compatibility issues, he said.

Related stories:

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Cyberattacks Are Tailored to Employees ... Why Isn't Security Training?
Tim Sadler, CEO and co-founder of Tessian,  6/17/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Powerful Cybersecurity Skills the Energy Sector Needs Most
Pam Baker, Contributing Writer,  6/22/2021
News
Microsoft Disrupts Large-Scale BEC Campaign Across Web Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-2322
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Vulnerability in OpenGrok (component: Web App). Versions that are affected are 1.6.7 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise OpenGrok. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of OpenGrok. CVSS 3.1 ...
CVE-2021-20019
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
A vulnerability in SonicOS where the HTTP server response leaks partial memory by sending a crafted HTTP request, this can potentially lead to an internal sensitive data disclosure vulnerability.
CVE-2021-21809
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
A command execution vulnerability exists in the default legacy spellchecker plugin in Moodle 3.10. A specially crafted series of HTTP requests can lead to command execution. An attacker must have administrator privileges to exploit this vulnerabilities.
CVE-2021-34067
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Heap based buffer overflow in tsMuxer 2.6.16 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by running the application with a crafted file.
CVE-2021-34068
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-23
Heap based buffer overflow in tsMuxer 2.6.16 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by running the application with a crafted file.