Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

4/16/2018
03:35 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

DevOps May Be Cause of and Solution to Open Source Component Chaos

DevOps is accelerating the trend of componentized development approaches, but its automation can also help enforce better governance and security.

RSA CONFERENCE 2018 – San Francisco – Modern software development is trending more toward a componentized approach because developers would rather assemble something using a variety of well-built pieces of third-party code than reinvent the wheel every time they create something new. The approach has done wonders for speed and agility, but it's increasing a lot of enterprise attack surfaces because too few organizations are keeping up with the vulnerabilities these components pose.

new study outlined today at the DevOps Connect event at RSA Conference in San Francisco shows that the threat, or at least the awareness of the threat, is on the rise. A survey conducted by Sonatype among over 2,000 IT pros — with a heavy emphasis on developers — showed that 31% of participants suspect or have verified a breach related to open source components in the last 12 months. That's more than double the ratio of those answering similarly in 2014.

In some ways, it's inevitable that components are drawing more scrutiny than four years ago. High-profile open source vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed and Struts-Shock are forcing this issue into the security consciousness of more organizations. And big breaches caused by components, such as the one at Equifax, emphasize the consequences of ignoring these vulnerabilities.

Unfortunately, that scrutiny isn't necessarily translating into swift, meaningful action to address the problem. The Sonatype study showed that 62% of organizations today still do not have meaningful controls over what components are in their applications. This number may even be on the optimistic side. A different study out last week from Veracode showed that only 23% of organizations test for vulnerabilities in components at every release and just 52% update those components when a security vulnerability in one of them is announced.

That's startling considering that the Veracode study found that 93% of organizations today utilize open source or third-party components, with an average of 73 components used in these applications. It's clear that this is no niche in development processes — it's simply how applications are built today. And given trends in DevOps, the trend is expected to accelerate.

"DevOps, in a way, has many parallels to high-velocity manufacturing, and as a part of that we're using open source components to be more efficient in that manufacturing," explains Derek Weeks, vice president and DevOps advocate for Sonatype, who went over study findings today.

While that's going to increase the number of components dev teams will use to build their applications, it also introduces a more reliable avenue for imposing some semblance of governance and control over those components.

"What they're doing is introducing tools to manage this massive number of components and parts in the 'manufacturing' process, whether they're containers moving around, bits of source code moving around, bits of open source components moving around, and build artifacts moving around," Weeks says. "They want to be able to release fast and fail fast. If you don't track those parts, it's very hard to release fast and then pull it back if you can't trace it."

Security teams should be able to piggyback onto this level of automation that's mostly been imposed for quality reasons to also control security vulnerabilities within source code. At mature DevSecOps teams, that's already happening, according to the Sonatype study. 

The research showed that among traditional waterfall development shops that do not adhere to DevOps methodologies, just 58% report having open source governance policies in place. What's worse, 48% of those non-DevOps shops with a policy say they ignore those policies. So just a sliver of traditional organizations have rules around how components are used and stick to them. Meanwhile, among mature DevOps shops, 77% report having open source governance policies in place. And just 24% of those organizations ignore the policies.

"When you're embedding open source governance throughout the development life cycle, automation becomes very difficult to ignore," Weeks explains. "It's embedded into the design tools and build tools that you're using, and when it's hitting you in the face as a developer, it's hard to sidestep."

 

Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop ITX. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop ITX 2018 agenda here.

Related Content:

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
BrianN060
50%
50%
BrianN060,
User Rank: Ninja
4/16/2018 | 4:42:49 PM
DevOps: cause and cure
Thanks Ericka.  The subject matter crosses most data/information security concern boundaries; and a true solution will require coordinated effort from each. 

I doubt if that can happen unless it's orchestrated, from the top, by each organization's Information System architects.  The raison d' etre for IS is informing knowledge workers.  That entails not only supplying information, but regulating it's dissemination.  It is only at the IS level (through the application of business rules, instantiated at the transactional data level), that policies can be enforced - otherwise, they are just suggestions. 
The Mainframe Is Seeing a Resurgence. Is Security Keeping Pace?
Ray Overby, Co-Founder & President at Key Resources, Inc.,  8/15/2019
The Flaw in Vulnerability Management: It's Time to Get Real
Jim Souders, Chief Executive Officer at Adaptiva,  8/15/2019
Tough Love: Debunking Myths about DevOps & Security
Jeff Williams, CTO, Contrast Security,  8/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5638
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-21
Rapid7 Nexpose versions 6.5.50 and prior suffer from insufficient session expiration when an administrator performs a security relevant edit on an existing, logged on user. For example, if a user's password is changed by an administrator due to an otherwise unrelated credential leak, that user accou...
CVE-2019-6177
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-21
A vulnerability reported in Lenovo Solution Center version 03.12.003, which is no longer supported, could allow log files to be written to non-standard locations, potentially leading to privilege escalation. Lenovo ended support for Lenovo Solution Center and recommended that customers migrate to Le...
CVE-2019-10687
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-21
KBPublisher 6.0.2.1 has SQL Injection via the admin/index.php?module=report entry_id[0] parameter, the admin/index.php?module=log id parameter, or an index.php?View=print&id[]= request.
CVE-2019-11601
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-21
A directory traversal vulnerability in remote access to backup & restore in earlier versions than ProSyst mBS SDK 8.2.6 and Bosch IoT Gateway Software 9.2.0 allows remote attackers to write or delete files at any location.
CVE-2019-11602
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-21
Leakage of stack traces in remote access to backup & restore in earlier versions than ProSyst mBS SDK 8.2.6 and Bosch IoT Gateway Software 9.2.0 allows remote attackers to gather information about the file system structure.