Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

8/2/2016
04:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Awareness Improving But Security Still Lags For SAP Implementations

SAP ecosystem a huge Achilles heel for enterprise system security, report says.

While SAP makes some of the most business-critical applications used by enterprises today, it has taken some time for the IT world to get serious about securing SAP infrastructure. In the wake of a several high-profile incidents involving SAP over the past year -- and an increasing focus by analysts on SAP defense issues -- SAP awareness is at an all-time high in 2016. But the statistics show that there's a lot of work to do in order to turn that awareness into meaningful protection for business-critical applications.

So says a new report out this week by ERPScan, which takes an in-depth look at the state of threats and protections around the global SAP ecosystem. As the report notes, 90% of the Fortune 2000 uses SAP and last year there were vulnerabilities in almost every SAP module, with CRM carrying the bulk of reported vulnerabilities. The footprint for possible SAP system exposure continues to grow beyond the traditional triumvirate of customer resource planning (CRM), supplier relationship management (SRM), and enterprise resource management (ERP) the firm is known for as it expands into IoT connections and mobility through its SAP HANA and SAP Mobile apps. As an example, a recent issue in SAP Mobile affected over a million mobile devices in 2015.

The firm reports that there are three big factors that make it difficult for enterprises to get SAP security under control. The first is a lack of qualified specialists in the field of protecting SAP. These applications are typically run by SAP specialists who often operate with dotted-line reporting to IT, outside the typical control of IT security teams. These specialists have very little security experience, and at the same time "security officers hardly understand SAP threats, not to mention methods and approaches of preventing them," the report notes.

Meanwhile, most SAP systems are highly flexible with a wide range of advanced configurations available -- there are more than 1,000 parameters in a standard system configuration alone, so there is no one gold standard for proper builds. Adding even more complication is the fact that these systems are usually very extensible and customized, with lots of home-brewed applications built on top of them.

As a result, it should hardly be a surprise that not only are there vulnerabilities in the software but many implementations are flawed from a security perspective. According to ERPScan, its scans of the worldwide SAP global landscape shows more than 36,000 SAP systems vulnerable to some kind of vulnerability or configuration issue. Of those, 69% shouldn't even be available directly through the internet, and yet they are.

These kinds of flaws are starting to gain the attention of attackers, who are recognizing the inherent vulnerability of these systems along with the extremely valuable data that they typically store and transmit. Most recently, in May, US CERT warned organizations of a widespread attack against dozens of global organizations that were hit using a vulnerability that SAP first offered a patch for over six years ago.

SAP provided this statement:

“SAP Product Security Response Team collaborates frequently with research companies like ERPScan and Onapsis to ensure a responsible disclosure of vulnerabilities. Security patches are available for download on the SAP Service Marketplace. We strongly advise our customers to secure their SAP landscape by applying the available security patches from the SAP Service Marketplace immediately.”

 Related Content: 

 

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19040
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
KairosDB through 1.2.2 has XSS in view.html because of showErrorMessage in js/graph.js, as demonstrated by view.html?q= with a '"sampling":{"value":"<script>' substring.
CVE-2019-19041
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An issue was discovered in Xorux Lpar2RRD 6.11 and Stor2RRD 2.61, as distributed in Xorux 2.41. They do not correctly verify the integrity of an upgrade package before processing it. As a result, official upgrade packages can be modified to inject an arbitrary Bash script that will be executed by th...
CVE-2019-19012
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
CVE-2019-19022
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
CVE-2019-19035
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.