Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

1/2/2020
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail

6 Security Team Goals for DevSecOps in 2020

Huge opportunities await security teams that are finally ready move the needle on security problems that have plagued organizations for years.
4 of 7

Make Big Security Gains with Policy as Code 

In the DevOps world, the biggest gains have been achieved through an 'everything-as-code' approach that has made it so much easier to spin up and down reliable, repeatable infrastructure components. In the future this could be a huge boon for security and compliance purposes, but right now there's a big gap between DevOps and security teams, says Tim Hinrichs, CTO and co-founder of Styra.

'This is particularly the case when audit time rolls around; auditors often have to be manually walked through security practices in containerized environments,' he says.

Hinrichs believes that teams should be seeking to adopt policy-based controls that are manifested in a policy-as-code format to help 'eliminate manual code reviews, ease compliance efforts, and eliminate process bottlenecks.' 

Sid Phadkar, a senior product manager at Akamai, agrees that many organizations are going to be building security policies directly within code to help deal with big compliance demands set upon them by regulations like GDPR.

'There will be an uptick in DevOps tools that cater to automating more compliance-related tasks within infosec teams, thus incorporating security and compliance measures into everyday CI workflows,' Phadkar says.

This will not only be a boon for compliance but also to generally ease security automation and container orchestration, says Glen Kosaka, vice president of product at NeuVector, explaining that DevSecOps teams should be looking to set security policies for 'any and all workload deployments' through YAML files.

'Security 'policy as code' -- and, overall, easier security automation -- will change how DevSecOps teams approach container security in 2020,' Kosaka says. Expect this evolution of more efficient and automated security integration processes to be a particularly welcome change for DevOps next year.

Image Source: Adobe (joyfotoliakid)

Make Big Security Gains with Policy as Code

In the DevOps world, the biggest gains have been achieved through an "everything-as-code" approach that has made it so much easier to spin up and down reliable, repeatable infrastructure components. In the future this could be a huge boon for security and compliance purposes, but right now there's a big gap between DevOps and security teams, says Tim Hinrichs, CTO and co-founder of Styra.

"This is particularly the case when audit time rolls around; auditors often have to be manually walked through security practices in containerized environments," he says.

Hinrichs believes that teams should be seeking to adopt policy-based controls that are manifested in a policy-as-code format to help "eliminate manual code reviews, ease compliance efforts, and eliminate process bottlenecks."

Sid Phadkar, a senior product manager at Akamai, agrees that many organizations are going to be building security policies directly within code to help deal with big compliance demands set upon them by regulations like GDPR.

"There will be an uptick in DevOps tools that cater to automating more compliance-related tasks within infosec teams, thus incorporating security and compliance measures into everyday CI workflows," Phadkar says.

This will not only be a boon for compliance but also to generally ease security automation and container orchestration, says Glen Kosaka, vice president of product at NeuVector, explaining that DevSecOps teams should be looking to set security policies for "any and all workload deployments" through YAML files.

"Security 'policy as code' -- and, overall, easier security automation -- will change how DevSecOps teams approach container security in 2020," Kosaka says. Expect this evolution of more efficient and automated security integration processes to be a particularly welcome change for DevOps next year.

Image Source: Adobe (joyfotoliakid)

4 of 7
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
SEODan
100%
0%
SEODan,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/17/2020 | 5:31:04 AM
Thanks Mrs Chickowski
Thank you Mrs Chickowski for these great slideshows
Cybersecurity Industry: It's Time to Stop the Victim Blame Game
Jessica Smith, Senior Vice President, The Crypsis Group,  2/25/2020
Google Adds More Security Features Via Chronicle Division
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/25/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-9431
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
In Wireshark 3.2.0 to 3.2.1, 3.0.0 to 3.0.8, and 2.6.0 to 2.6.14, the LTE RRC dissector could leak memory. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-lte-rrc.c by adjusting certain append operations.
CVE-2020-9432
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
openssl_x509_check_host in lua-openssl 0.7.7-1 mishandles X.509 certificate validation because it uses lua_pushboolean for certain non-boolean return values.
CVE-2020-9433
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
openssl_x509_check_email in lua-openssl 0.7.7-1 mishandles X.509 certificate validation because it uses lua_pushboolean for certain non-boolean return values.
CVE-2020-9434
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
openssl_x509_check_ip_asc in lua-openssl 0.7.7-1 mishandles X.509 certificate validation because it uses lua_pushboolean for certain non-boolean return values.
CVE-2020-6383
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-27
Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 80.0.3987.116 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page.