Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

2/14/2017
09:25 AM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

25 Percent of Web Apps Still Vulnerable to Eight of the OWASP Top Ten

Research from Contrast Security also finds that 80 Percent of software applications aad at least one vulnerability

Los Altos, Calif. – Feb. 13, 2017Contrast Security, the first company to enable self-protecting software, today announced the findings from a security research project on web application vulnerabilities. The data, collected by Contrast Labs from the Contrast Security platform across several popular development languages, revealed sensitive data exposure, which includes missing and weak encryption, as the top vulnerability, plaguing 69 percent of web applications and accounting for 26 percent of all vulnerabilities. The research also found that 80 percent of tested software applications had at least one vulnerability, with an average of 45 vulnerabilities per application.

The top 5 web application vulnerabilities according to the Contrast Labs research are as follows:

  • Sensitive data exposure – affects 69 percent of applications
  • Cross-site request forgery – affects 55 percent of applications
  • Broken authentication and session management – affects 41 percent of applications
  • Security misconfiguration – affects 37 percent of applications
  • Missing function level access control – affects 33 percent of applications

“The level of application vulnerability revealed by this analysis is deeply concerning,” said Jeff Williams, CTO and co-founder of Contrast Security. “All of these vulnerabilities have been documented in the OWASP Top Ten for over a decade, yet they’re obviously still a major problem. Given the level of vulnerability and increasing threat, organizations should adopt a continuous application security strategy and make sure the development and security teams are bought in.

Top Vulnerabilities by Language: Java and .NET

Contrast Labs compared the top web application vulnerabilities across two of the most popular web application development languages: Java and .NET. In so doing, Contrast Labs revealed that Java suffers from higher prevalence of cross-site request forgery (impacting 69 percent of Java applications, as compared to 31 percent in .NET) and less security misconfiguration problems than .NET (14 percent in Java versus 73 percent in .NET). This is almost certainly because .NET relies far more on configuration than Java applications do; however, the high numbers of security misconfiguration in .NET indicate that this approach is not without its own set of problems.

Contrast Labs also found a lower number of injection flaws in .NET applications (affecting 17 percent of applications), where the use of persistence layers has helped to stamp out these flaws. However, injection flaws are still quite prevalent in Java applications at 38 percent, where there are many more database options. Injection, a common vulnerability often missed by traditional application security tools, can sometimes lead to a much more serious compromise. If attackers are able to pivot from injection to a complete host takeover, there’s no limit to the access that attackers would have to a software application’s data and capabilities.

“In today’s world, every organization has become a software company,” said Williams. “Insecure code has become the leading security risk and, increasingly, the leading business risk as well. Unfortunately, when it comes to addressing web application vulnerabilities, many businesses are relying on legacy scanners that are difficult to manage, inaccurate and do not fit in with modern software environments. To protect software applications effectively, continuous security must go along with continuous integration, delivery and deployment to provide up-to-the-minute analysis of web application vulnerabilities.”

Contrast Labs is a team of accomplished cybersecurity researchers and industry experts that perform application security threat analysis, security analytics and other security research at Contrast Security. The work performed by Contrast Labs continuously improves the Contrast Security platform with support for new threats, attacks, vulnerabilities, and defenses.

About Contrast Security

Contrast Security is the world’s leading provider of security technology that enables software applications to protect themselves against cyberattacks, heralding the new era of self-protecting software. Contrast's patented deep security instrumentation is the breakthrough technology that enables highly accurate assessment and always-on protection of an entire application portfolio, without disruptive scanning or expensive security experts. Only Contrast has sensors that work actively inside applications to uncover vulnerabilities, prevent data breaches, and secure the entire enterprise from development, to operations, to production. More information can be found at www.contrastsecurity.com or by following Contrast on Twitter at @ContrastSec.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
A Realistic Threat Model for the Masses
Lysa Myers, Security Researcher, ESET,  10/9/2019
USB Drive Security Still Lags
Dark Reading Staff 10/9/2019
How to Think Like a Hacker
Dr. Giovanni Vigna, Chief Technology Officer at Lastline,  10/10/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-4031
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
IBM Workload Scheduler Distributed 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, and 9.5 contains a vulnerability that could allow a local user to write files as root in the file system, which could allow the attacker to gain root privileges. IBM X-Force ID: 155997.
CVE-2019-17626
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
ReportLab through 3.5.26 allows remote code execution because of toColor(eval(arg)) in colors.py, as demonstrated by a crafted XML document with '<span color="' followed by arbitrary Python code.
CVE-2019-17627
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
The Yale Bluetooth Key application for mobile devices allows unauthorized unlock actions by sniffing Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) traffic during one authorized unlock action, and then calculating the authentication key via simple computations on the hex digits of a valid authentication request. This a...
CVE-2019-17625
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
There is a stored XSS in Rambox 0.6.9 that can lead to code execution. The XSS is in the name field while adding/editing a service. The problem occurs due to incorrect sanitization of the name field when being processed and stored. This allows a user to craft a payload for Node.js and Electron, such...
CVE-2019-17624
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-16
In X.Org X Server 1.20.4, there is a stack-based buffer overflow in the function XQueryKeymap. For example, by sending ct.c_char 1000 times, an attacker can cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact.