Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Application Security

10% of Ransomware Attacks on SMBs Targeted IoT Devices

IoT ransomware attacks are expected to ramp up in the coming years, a new survey shows.

Some cybercriminals are leveraging the growing base of IoT devices in enterprises that come with little or no security as targets for their ransomware attacks, a report released today by Arctic Wolf found.

IoT devices were the targets of 10% of all ransomware attacks on small-to midsized businesses, according to the survey of 300 IT and security executives of companies with between 200 to 3,000 employees.

"[That] was a lot higher than I was expecting," says Young-Sae Song, vice president at Arctic Wolf. "I was expecting something less than 5% because IoT is still an emerging technology."

According to the survey, one-fourth of all cyberattacks the SMBs suffered involved ransomware. And of this ransomware group, IoT devices comprised a significant portion, Song says. "Anything 10% or more is getting into a significant amount."

The collision of ransomware and IoT attacks is expected to increase for a number of reasons, Song says, pointing to the rapid adoption of IoT devices by small and mid-sized businesses and their continued use of rudimentary cybersecurity such as only firewalls and antivirus software

"It's not hard to combine a ransomware campaign with an IoT attack," Song says. "At the end of the day, they are often both attacking the same operating system and software."

It doesn't take much extra work to attack IoT devices as part of a ransomware campaign, he notes. That's because in many cases, IoT devices ultimately connect to a Windows or Linux server to share information and data and these servers can be locked down as well by ransomware once an IoT device has been compromised. IoT attacks accounted for 13% of the all security breaches listed by survey respondents, compared to 25% for ransomware, the survey found.

But in the next year or two, Song predicts IoT ransomware attacks are likely to increase to around 25% to 30% of all ransomware cases.

Ransom for Function, Not Data

The notion of IoT ransomware attacks have clearly moved beyond the theoretical and into real-life scenarios. Earlier this year, according to a New York Times report, the swanky Romantik Seehotel Jaegerwirt hotel in Austria fell victim to an IoT ransomware attack.

Cyberthieves took control of the hotel's electronic key system, locking guests out of their rooms. In order to regain control of the hotel rooms, Romantik's management agreed to pay the ransom demand of approximately $1,800 in bitcoins, according to the Times.

Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable CISOs and IT security experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation. Click for more info and to register.

IoT ransomware cases are markedly different than traditional ransomware attacks, which lock down access to important documents and data and usually are accompanied with a ransom demand. IoT ransomware cases, in contrast, target devices that serve a functional purpose but may or may not store data within the device, security experts say.

One security professional, Javvad Malik, a security advocate at AlienVault, noted in a Dark Reading post that IoT device hijackers not only need to "compromise the data collected through a device's sensors, but [would also need to] render a critical device's physical functions inaccessible," in order to up the odds that a victim will pay the ransom.

So ransomware attackers would likely target mission-critical IoT devices like automated robotic arms used on a manufacturer's production plant floor, rather than a consumer device like a talking Barbie.

Related Content:

 

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Look Beyond the 'Big 5' in Cyberattacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/25/2020
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: I think the boss is bing watching '70s TV shows again!
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5423
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
CAPI (Cloud Controller) versions prior to 1.101.0 are vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack in which an unauthenticated malicious attacker can send specially-crafted YAML files to certain endpoints, causing the YAML parser to consume excessive CPU and RAM.
CVE-2020-29454
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
Editors/LogViewerController.cs in Umbraco through 8.9.1 allows a user to visit a logviewer endpoint even if they lack Applications.Settings access.
CVE-2020-7199
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
A security vulnerability has been identified in the HPE Edgeline Infrastructure Manager, also known as HPE Edgeline Infrastructure Management Software. The vulnerability could be remotely exploited to bypass remote authentication leading to execution of arbitrary commands, gaining privileged access,...
CVE-2020-14260
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
HCL Domino is susceptible to a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in DXL due to improper validation of user input. A successful exploit could enable an attacker to crash Domino or execute attacker-controlled code on the server system.
CVE-2020-14305
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
An out-of-bounds memory write flaw was found in how the Linux kernel’s Voice Over IP H.323 connection tracking functionality handled connections on ipv6 port 1720. This flaw allows an unauthenticated remote user to crash the system, causing a denial of service. The highest threat ...