Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

11/11/2014
11:50 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

How Enterprises Can Get The Most From Threat Intelligence

Understanding the threats faced by your organization can improve your defenses. Here are some tips for choosing tools and services -- and maximizing their impact.

Download the entire new issue of InformationWeek Tech Digest, distributed in an all-digital format (free registration required).

In the battle to beat back cyber attackers, security-savvy companies know that "context" is one of the most valuable ways to prioritize security efforts.

Many companies use security information and event management (SIEM) and security analytics tools to connect log and monitoring data for a better contextual picture of how systems and users are acting on the network. But a big element lacking within that information is the external factor -- the hottest trends among cybercrooks.

How are attackers adjusting their hacking techniques to get around current defenses? From what IP addresses are they operating, and what kind of vulnerabilities are they most often exploiting right now? Which attackers are targeting certain industries and why? What kind of data are attackers looking to steal? Log and monitoring data doesn't shed light on these broader trends, which is why companies turn to threat intelligence services.

A growing number of vendors sell threat intelligence subscriptions and services. Some such services are industry-specific, some cater to a geographic region. Some are simply technical blacklists. Others are more like news services with high-level narrative information about attacker behavior. It's a fast-growing business -- IDC reported spending on threat intelligence services grew last year by nearly 20% to $795 million. A recent Dark Reading survey shows that 85% of enterprises are using threat intelligence to some degree.

How much organizations get out of their spending depends on how well they pick their threat intelligence feeds and how they tie that back to their own threats and systems to block threats and find compromises quickly.

Threat intel origins

Threat intelligence is usually scraped from two major methods, says Gartner's Anton Chuvakin. The first is from security monitoring. The data could be a group of organizations that pool and share their internal monitoring information, or it could be a huge vendor using anonymized information gathered from a large client base. That's the low-hanging fruit.

The second is threat intelligence gathered by vendors or nonprofits that "actively crawl for threats, browse sites for malware, run honeypots, spam traps, sinkholes, or even actively ‘engage' the threat actors and/or infiltrate their ranks," Chuvakin says.

Threat intelligence feeds can be qualitative or quantitative.

Qualitative types of threat intelligence focus on providing newsfeed-like services on the campaigns, tools, techniques, and motivations of attackers. More quantitative sources -- blacklists of domains, URLs, IPs -- are intended for use directly by the preventive and monitoring systems to help detect and block activity with known bad sites. The quantitative sources are sometimes offered as standalone services, or integrated into products such as IDS and SIEM offerings, firewalls, and gateways. Qualitative feeds can be analyzed by security operations center staff or incident handlers to help them better identify technical attack trends.

Combining all these types of threat intelligence is meant to help companies fine-tune their protection strategies for new attacks and to counter threats targeting their specific type of business or data. For example, a bank could discover that a certain group of criminals is targeting the sector using an attack that exploits key vulnerabilities in a major enterprise relationship management platform, and those attackers are exfiltrating data to a handful of known bad IP addresses. The company could then put a priority on fixing any vulnerabilities in that system, and either block those IP addresses or keep tabs on the attackers using them.

Ultimately, the idea is to get beyond simply reacting to malware, and base security strategy on how the adversaries are maneuvering.

"If you don't understand the attackers that may be coming after you, or know their tradecraft, you really have very little chance of tailoring your defenses to the threat," says Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder and CTO of CrowdStrike, a threat intelligence and security analytics firm.

Read the rest of the story in the new issue of
InformationWeek Tech Digest (free registration required).
Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
cbonet
50%
50%
cbonet,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/21/2014 | 4:24:09 PM
Multiple Threat Intelligence Feeds

It seems with so many types and formats of the feeds many organizations are struggling with aggregating and normalizing the information in a manner which allows for an efficient, effective and consistent way to utilize the information.  Perhaps as standards such as STIX & TAXII it will help with the problem.

Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Ninja
11/11/2014 | 3:40:47 PM
Threat intelligence, a good concept
That's a good description of the uses of threat intelligence, Ericka. If only we could take a more active role in countering, infiltrating and identifying the bad actors and put them on the defensive, for a change.
Attackers Leave Stolen Credentials Searchable on Google
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2021
How to Better Secure Your Microsoft 365 Environment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/25/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: I can't find the back door.
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-21272
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-25
ORAS is open source software which enables a way to push OCI Artifacts to OCI Conformant registries. ORAS is both a CLI for initial testing and a Go Module. In ORAS from version 0.4.0 and before version 0.9.0, there is a "zip-slip" vulnerability. The directory support feature allows the ...
CVE-2021-23901
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-25
An XML external entity (XXE) injection vulnerability was discovered in the Nutch DmozParser and is known to affect Nutch versions < 1.18. XML external entity injection (also known as XXE) is a web security vulnerability that allows an attacker to interfere with an application's processing of XML ...
CVE-2020-17532
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-25
When handler-router component is enabled in servicecomb-java-chassis, authenticated user may inject some data and cause arbitrary code execution. The problem happens in versions between 2.0.0 ~ 2.1.3 and fixed in Apache ServiceComb-Java-Chassis 2.1.5
CVE-2020-12512
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-22
Pepperl+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master in Version 1.5.48 and below is prone to an authenticated reflected POST Cross-Site Scripting
CVE-2020-12513
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-22
Pepperl+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master in Version 1.5.48 and below is prone to an authenticated blind OS Command Injection.