Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

11/11/2014
11:50 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

How Enterprises Can Get The Most From Threat Intelligence

Understanding the threats faced by your organization can improve your defenses. Here are some tips for choosing tools and services -- and maximizing their impact.

Download the entire new issue of InformationWeek Tech Digest, distributed in an all-digital format (free registration required).

In the battle to beat back cyber attackers, security-savvy companies know that "context" is one of the most valuable ways to prioritize security efforts.

Many companies use security information and event management (SIEM) and security analytics tools to connect log and monitoring data for a better contextual picture of how systems and users are acting on the network. But a big element lacking within that information is the external factor -- the hottest trends among cybercrooks.

How are attackers adjusting their hacking techniques to get around current defenses? From what IP addresses are they operating, and what kind of vulnerabilities are they most often exploiting right now? Which attackers are targeting certain industries and why? What kind of data are attackers looking to steal? Log and monitoring data doesn't shed light on these broader trends, which is why companies turn to threat intelligence services.

A growing number of vendors sell threat intelligence subscriptions and services. Some such services are industry-specific, some cater to a geographic region. Some are simply technical blacklists. Others are more like news services with high-level narrative information about attacker behavior. It's a fast-growing business -- IDC reported spending on threat intelligence services grew last year by nearly 20% to $795 million. A recent Dark Reading survey shows that 85% of enterprises are using threat intelligence to some degree.

How much organizations get out of their spending depends on how well they pick their threat intelligence feeds and how they tie that back to their own threats and systems to block threats and find compromises quickly.

Threat intel origins

Threat intelligence is usually scraped from two major methods, says Gartner's Anton Chuvakin. The first is from security monitoring. The data could be a group of organizations that pool and share their internal monitoring information, or it could be a huge vendor using anonymized information gathered from a large client base. That's the low-hanging fruit.

The second is threat intelligence gathered by vendors or nonprofits that "actively crawl for threats, browse sites for malware, run honeypots, spam traps, sinkholes, or even actively ‘engage' the threat actors and/or infiltrate their ranks," Chuvakin says.

Threat intelligence feeds can be qualitative or quantitative.

Qualitative types of threat intelligence focus on providing newsfeed-like services on the campaigns, tools, techniques, and motivations of attackers. More quantitative sources -- blacklists of domains, URLs, IPs -- are intended for use directly by the preventive and monitoring systems to help detect and block activity with known bad sites. The quantitative sources are sometimes offered as standalone services, or integrated into products such as IDS and SIEM offerings, firewalls, and gateways. Qualitative feeds can be analyzed by security operations center staff or incident handlers to help them better identify technical attack trends.

Combining all these types of threat intelligence is meant to help companies fine-tune their protection strategies for new attacks and to counter threats targeting their specific type of business or data. For example, a bank could discover that a certain group of criminals is targeting the sector using an attack that exploits key vulnerabilities in a major enterprise relationship management platform, and those attackers are exfiltrating data to a handful of known bad IP addresses. The company could then put a priority on fixing any vulnerabilities in that system, and either block those IP addresses or keep tabs on the attackers using them.

Ultimately, the idea is to get beyond simply reacting to malware, and base security strategy on how the adversaries are maneuvering.

"If you don't understand the attackers that may be coming after you, or know their tradecraft, you really have very little chance of tailoring your defenses to the threat," says Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder and CTO of CrowdStrike, a threat intelligence and security analytics firm.

Read the rest of the story in the new issue of
InformationWeek Tech Digest (free registration required).
Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
cbonet
50%
50%
cbonet,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/21/2014 | 4:24:09 PM
Multiple Threat Intelligence Feeds

It seems with so many types and formats of the feeds many organizations are struggling with aggregating and normalizing the information in a manner which allows for an efficient, effective and consistent way to utilize the information.  Perhaps as standards such as STIX & TAXII it will help with the problem.

Charlie Babcock
50%
50%
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Ninja
11/11/2014 | 3:40:47 PM
Threat intelligence, a good concept
That's a good description of the uses of threat intelligence, Ericka. If only we could take a more active role in countering, infiltrating and identifying the bad actors and put them on the defensive, for a change.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.