Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

10/23/2015
09:30 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Passing the Sniff Test: Security Metrics and Measures

Cigital dishes dirt on top security metrics that don't work well, why they're ineffective and which measurable to consider instead.
Previous
1 of 9
Next

Image: Adobe Stock

Image: Adobe Stock

 

Security metrics are one of the key pillars of establishing a mature cybersecurity program. We’ve spilled a lot of digital ink over the years at Dark Reading discussing some of the top security metrics that organizations should consider collecting and analyzing. But are all security metrics good ones? According to Caroline Wong, security initiative director at Cigital, the short answer is, ‘Nope!’ She’s seen organizations waste resources on measuring things that don’t really matter to the business and do nothing to help drive improvement.

“I've really been doing security metrics for about ten years, so I've had more time to think about stuff,” she says. “And one of the things that I've realized is that there are some metrics which organizations track that I really just don't think are useful.”

Caroline gave us the lowdown on metrics effectiveness. She started by offering some key sniff tests for determining if your metric is a stinker. Then she offered up some examples of ineffective metrics, as well as alternatives that will better help move the needle for security.   

 

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 9
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
10/26/2015 | 8:01:43 AM
Displaying Value
Whenever you are trying to devise important metrics of either a tool you own or a process think of the metric by the value it provides. Does it delineate cost savings, does it help to point out a broken business process, etc.
copleydt
50%
50%
copleydt,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/24/2015 | 10:39:51 AM
Practical Advise
Your article was right on the spot; very pragmatic and useful. I've been in security a long time and am currently a CISO for a large healthcare provider and I've seen some metrics which I consider to be of no value.  I speak on security fairly often and I was just contemplating assembling a presentation on this same topic -  what security metrics NOT to use and what you SHOULD be measuring.
Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5524
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Aterm series (Aterm WF1200C firmware Ver1.2.1 and earlier, Aterm WG1200CR firmware Ver1.2.1 and earlier, Aterm WG2600HS firmware Ver1.3.2 and earlier) allows an attacker on the same network segment to execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges via UPnP function.
CVE-2020-5525
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Aterm series (Aterm WF1200C firmware Ver1.2.1 and earlier, Aterm WG1200CR firmware Ver1.2.1 and earlier, Aterm WG2600HS firmware Ver1.3.2 and earlier) allows an authenticated attacker on the same network segment to execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges via management screen.
CVE-2020-5533
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Aterm WG2600HS firmware Ver1.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2020-5534
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
Aterm WG2600HS firmware Ver1.3.2 and earlier allows an authenticated attacker on the same network segment to execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2014-7914
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
btif/src/btif_dm.c in Android before 5.1 does not properly enforce the temporary nature of a Bluetooth pairing, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted Bluetooth packets after the tapping of a crafted NFC tag.