Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

6/5/2018
11:30 AM
Danelle Au
Danelle Au
Commentary
Connect Directly
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

I, for One, Welcome Our Robotic Security Overlords

Automation will come in more subtle ways than C-3PO - and it's transforming cybersecurity.

There's a common fallacy in popular culture that depicts robots as an improved, mechanical version of the human form. The Tin Man from The Wizard of Oz, Gort from The Day the Earth Stood Still, Rosie from The Jetsons,and C-3PO from Star Wars are just a few classic examples of that mistaken assumption. Actual humanish robots don't do as well as their science fiction counterparts, as this compilation clip from the DARPA Robotics Competition gloriously illustrates.

Humans are all-purpose survivors. Robots, on the other hand, are at their best when designed to carry out specific tasks. Don't think Tin Man; think ZX200S. Don't think Rosie; think Roomba. Robots can accomplish the things they are designed to do faster and more accurately than people — and without fatigue or complaint. The fatigue part is critical. At our best, humans are prone to make mistakes. And while practice improves our performance, fatigue will quickly degrade both our motor functions and our decision-making. To protect public safety, truck drivers and pilots are limited by law from operating their vehicles for long periods without adequate rest. And with evidence that driving drowsy can be as dangerous as driving intoxicated, many states have laws against fatigued driving by private motorists.

Fatigue is also an issue in cybersecurity — one that can lead to poor decision-making. On their own, security analysts can't be expected to keep pace with the onslaught of threats. The volume and persistence of attacks against the enterprise are simply too high and too constant. By some calculations, networks may be subject to thousands of attempts to breach security every day, and if yours is a high-priority target, that number is far greater. It is estimated that the U.S. Department of Defense is bombarded by a withering 36 million daily email-borne attacks. Even at our best, human beings can't handle those kinds of numbers. We need help.

Fortunately, we are seeing greater use of automation and machine-driven decision-making tools to combat this problem. As always, new categories of cybersecurity technology have emerged to meet growing threats and are giving enterprises a means of not only thwarting the adversary, but of overcoming the pitfalls that come with relying solely on human intervention.

Here are some predominant ways automation is transforming cybersecurity:

• Practice and Repetition for Preparedness
Security's biggest challenge was trying to prove a negative. No breach must mean that the technology and defense is working. Yet at some point, compromise is confirmed, and sometimes it existed for an extended period — and rarely is anyone ready. The reality is that true preparedness — and from it, we hope, prevention — comes from two models that must be understood and repeated, as often if possible, and with automated technology assistance where available. The two viewpoints that need to be driven into organizational muscle memory are "paths, not point-of-attack" and "plan execution, not point-in-time."

It's crucial to understand that one compromise does not make a breach. Finding the point of entry is only the beginning of the "kill chain," and organizations need to find as many of the subsequent paths to the ultimate target — and then also track the potential paths back out. Automation is huge in calculating the universe of paths and probabilities. Once this is done, repetition — both in practicing attacks and coordinating response — are the critical complement. Industry analyst firm Gartner has outlined some of the technologies in these two categories, terming them breach and attack simulation and security orchestration and response, respectively.  

• Correlation of Data for Incident Response
One of the biggest challenges for security analysts when they receive an alert is understanding whether the threat is real or not (that is, a false positive). A variety of data from different sources is needed to make that decision. For example, if a malware alert is triggered, an analyst might want to pull the logs for the device associated with the IP address in question, validate the owner and role of the device with a network access control system, and check the malware sample in VirusTotal (to see if another security product has detected this variant). Security automation and orchestration platforms can simplify this process, enabling multiple sources of information to be pulled together into one screen for analysts to query, eliminating one of cybersecurity's most time-consuming operational tasks.

•Security Analytics for Threat Detection
The first phase of threat detection technology that emerged gave security teams the ability to detonate files with potential infection in a virtual sandbox — the advanced persistent threat or zero-day malware solution. Once a file was found to be infected, a signature for the malware in question was created, extending protections beyond "patient zero." New automation and analytics solutions expand beyond this capability to include processing and analyzing massive amounts of user and network data to identify anomalies. Automation enables faster and more accurate analysis and, combined with machine learning, brings greater insights to potential threats lurking in the environment.

Automation in cybersecurity brings the promise of scalability of resources, maximization of efficiencies, and increased effectiveness. What is critical is to ensure that vendors offering each of the promising technologies above do not further bog down security teams with more "noise."

Tomorrow's security operations centers won't be staffed by robotic bipeds with lasers for eyes and synthesized voices asking the hackers they detect to "take me to your leader." But they will be — and indeed are — outfitted by sophisticated systems that use machine learning, intelligent automation, and indefatigable vigilance to keep hackers from succeeding at their craft. I, for one, welcome our robotic security overlords.

Related Content:

Danelle is vice president of strategy at SafeBreach. She has more than 15 years of experience bringing new technologies to market. Prior to SafeBreach, Danelle led strategy and marketing at Adallom, a cloud security company acquired by Microsoft. She was also responsible for ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Babette
50%
50%
Babette,
User Rank: Apprentice
7/26/2018 | 11:24:54 AM
Good post
Good post.Thank you for sharing it.It is informative and very useful too
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-3154
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
CRLF injection vulnerability in Zend\Mail (Zend_Mail) in Zend Framework before 1.12.12, 2.x before 2.3.8, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the header of an email.
CVE-2019-17190
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
A Local Privilege Escalation issue was discovered in Avast Secure Browser 76.0.1659.101. The vulnerability is due to an insecure ACL set by the AvastBrowserUpdate.exe (which is running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM) when AvastSecureBrowser.exe checks for new updates. When the update check is triggered, the...
CVE-2014-8161
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive column values by triggering constraint violation and then reading the error message.
CVE-2014-9481
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The Scribunto extension for MediaWiki allows remote attackers to obtain the rollback token and possibly other sensitive information via a crafted module, related to unstripping special page HTML.
CVE-2015-0241
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The to_char function in PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a (1) large number of digits when processing a numeric ...