Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

3/21/2019
04:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Businesses Manage 9.7PB of Data but Struggle to Protect It

What's more, their attempts to secure it may be putting information at risk, a new report finds.

Organizations managed an average of 9.7 petabytes of data in 2018, a 569% spike compared with the 1.45 petabytes they handled in 2016. Most see the value of data, and more are monetizing it, yet very few are confident in their existing tools' ability to properly protect information.

This insight comes from Dell EMC's third "Global Data Protection Index," its most recent since 2016. Researchers polled 2,200 IT decision makers from public and private organizations across 18 countries and industries to learn about the state and maturity of data protection strategies.

What they found is businesses are managing much more data, nearly all (92%) recognize its value, and 36% are monetizing it. Still, most are challenged to secure it, and their attempts may be putting information at risk. More than three-quarters (76%) of respondents say their companies had "some type of disruption" within a 12-month period, and 27% couldn't recover their data using their data protection tools – nearly double the 14% who said the same in 2016.

Coincidentally, 76% of respondents are using at least two data protection vendors, which researchers say makes them 35% more likely to experience disruption during a 12-month time frame than those with a single vendor. The most common types of interference among companies using multiple vendors was unplanned systems downtime (43%), ransomware attacks preventing data access (32%), and loss of information (29%).

"Organizations are valuing data more than ever before," says Ruya Atac-Barrett, vice president of marketing of data protection at Dell EMC. "And that's also driving more focus on how do you ensure availability of data, how do you protect data."

System downtime may be more common, but data loss is more expensive. The businesses that experienced downtime struggled with an average of 20 hours lost in the past year, costing $526,845. Those that lost data lost an average of 2.13 terabytes, which has a price tag of nearly $1 million.

The downside of organizations placing greater value on data is cybercriminals recognize it, says Alex Almeida, consultant and product marketing lead with Dell EMC. "That also increases the risk because bad actors realize how much that data is valued to those businesses, and they try to exploit it," he adds. This realization is driving the frequency of threats, like ransomware attacks.

Data Protection: Complexity and Compliance
The majority of respondents struggle to implement a data protection tool that sufficiently meets their needs, and 95% face at least one challenge related to securing their information.

Their biggest challenge, cited by 46% of respondents, is the complexity of configuring and operating data protection software and hardware, along with the price of storing backup copies. Next up is the lack of data protection for emerging technologies (45%), followed by ensuring compliance with regulations like the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (41%).

"We saw regulation being more of a driver and a catalyst," Atac-Barrett says. Now more so than ever, businesses think about what they need to do from a data management perspective. Only 35% are "very confident" their data protection strategies are compliant with regional regulation.

Then there's the cloud factor: Most (98%) of respondents using the public cloud do so for data protection, the report shows. The top use case for cloud-based data security is backup services, which protect workloads developed in the cloud using new applications (41%), tied with backup of on-prem workloads and data (41%). Forty percent protect specific SaaS applications, and 40% use cloud-enabled versions of on-prem data protection software to protect public cloud workloads.

"Not only are companies trying to protect and make sure data is available, but 98% of organizations are leveraging public cloud as part of their protection strategies," Atac-Barrett adds. Cloud will continue to be important in data security, with 64% of respondents saying scalability is important.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Windows 10 Migration: Getting It Right
Kevin Alexandra, Principal Solutions Engineer at BeyondTrust,  5/15/2019
Baltimore Ransomware Attack Takes Strange Twist
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/14/2019
When Older Windows Systems Won't Die
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  5/17/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12184
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-19
There is XSS in browser/components/MarkdownPreview.js in BoostIO Boostnote 0.11.15 via a label named flowchart, sequence, gallery, or chart, as demonstrated by a crafted SRC attribute of an IFRAME element, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-12136.
CVE-2019-12173
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-18
MacDown 0.7.1 (870) allows remote code execution via a file:\\\ URI, with a .app pathname, in the HREF attribute of an A element. This is different from CVE-2019-12138.
CVE-2019-12172
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Typora 0.9.9.21.1 (1913) allows arbitrary code execution via a modified file: URL syntax in the HREF attribute of an AREA element, as demonstrated by file:\\\ on macOS or Linux, or file://C| on Windows. This is different from CVE-2019-12137.
CVE-2019-12168
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Four-Faith Wireless Mobile Router F3x24 v1.0 devices allow remote code execution via the Command Shell (aka Administration > Commands) screen.
CVE-2019-12170
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
ATutor through 2.2.4 is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads via the mods/_core/backups/upload.php (aka backup) component. This may result in remote command execution. An attacker can use the instructor account to fully compromise the system using a crafted backup ZIP archive. This will allow for PH...